Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 Namaste friends, Finn Wandahl and Vijaydas Pradeep are arguing that lagna in divisions is only to be "projected" to the rasi chart and used in rasi chart. See the view below: > Sloka 13: "If the Shadvargas of the Lagna are occupied or aspectedby one and> the same planet a Raja Yoga is formed.">> As I read this, the aspects are only to be used in the signs(Rashi) and> each of the Shadvargas occupied by the Ascendant are thereforeprojected into> the natal chart (Rashi) from which it is observed if one planet isaspecting> all the six Lagna-Rashis at the same time. Now I have a couple of very basic questions on this. (1) If the sign occupied by lagna in navamsa can be "projected" onto the rasi chart and used, why can't the sign occupied by Moon be "projected" onto the rasi chart and used? In fact, why can't the signs occupied by all planets be "projected" onto the rasi chart and used, perhaps with lagna of the rasi chart? Parasara defined the transformation needed to figure out the sign occupied in navamsa by lagna or any planet, given its longitude. When navamsa sign is defined for lagna and all planets, why allow the "projection" of only lagna onto the rasi chart and why not other planets? Why do we have to be logically inconsistent? (2) If you agree to that, I will go one step further and ask: If lagna of navamsa and various planets of navamsa can be independently "projected" onto the rasi chart, why can't we project all of them together and just use them together? That's nothing but the navamsa chart!! May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha -------------------------------Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.netFree Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.orgSri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 Dear PVR, In Kerala like your mixed char view of JHora we *project* Navamsa of lagna and all other planets (and similarly for all other Vargas) on top of the Rasi chart (Natal chart) and use them for prediction. Aspect within Varga is never considered. In your words: >If the sign occupied by lagna in navamsa can be "projected" onto the >rasi chart and used, why can't the sign occupied by Moon be >"projected" onto the rasi chart and used? In fact, why can't the >signs occupied by all planets be "projected" onto the rasi chart and >used, perhaps with lagna of the rasi chart? Not the Nvamsa legana but the legna it self is considered. Like you mentioned the sign occupied by Moon, or any planet can be *projected* on top of any varga in the Bhavat-Bhava (Sign to sign) thinking method. In your words: >When navamsa sign is defined for lagna and all planets, why allow the >"projection" of only lagna onto the rasi chart and why not other >planets? Why do we have to be logically inconsistent? As far as I understand there is no logical inconsistency. Not only the Lagna (not navamsa lagna) any sign/planet can be used for such projection. In your words: >If lagna of navamsa and various planets of navamsa can be >independently "projected" onto the rasi chart, why can't we project >all of them together and just use them together? Yes. That is what we do here in Kerala. And we feel that every text we came across supports the same view. Love, Sreenadh vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@c ....> wrote: > > Namaste friends, > > Finn Wandahl and Vijaydas Pradeep are arguing that lagna in divisions is only to be "projected" to the rasi chart and used in rasi chart. See the view below: > > > Sloka 13: "If the Shadvargas of the Lagna are occupied or aspected > by one and > > the same planet a Raja Yoga is formed." > > > > As I read this, the aspects are only to be used in the signs > (Rashi) and > > each of the Shadvargas occupied by the Ascendant are therefore > projected into > > the natal chart (Rashi) from which it is observed if one planet is > aspecting > > all the six Lagna-Rashis at the same time. > > Now I have a couple of very basic questions on this. > > (1) If the sign occupied by lagna in navamsa can be "projected" onto the rasi chart and used, why can't the sign occupied by Moon be "projected" onto the rasi chart and used? In fact, why can't the signs occupied by all planets be "projected" onto the rasi chart and used, perhaps with lagna of the rasi chart? > > Parasara defined the transformation needed to figure out the sign occupied in navamsa by lagna or any planet, given its longitude. When navamsa sign is defined for lagna and all planets, why allow the "projection" of only lagna onto the rasi chart and why not other planets? Why do we have to be logically inconsistent? > > (2) If you agree to that, I will go one step further and ask: If lagna of navamsa and various planets of navamsa can be independently "projected" onto the rasi chart, why can't we project all of them together and just use them together? > > That's nothing but the navamsa chart!! > > May Jupiter's light shine on us, > Narasimha > ------------------------------- > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > ------------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.