Guest guest Posted November 5, 2005 Report Share Posted November 5, 2005 namastey sir we have God men come to earth in past why not now are we lost how about science will it replace religion and unite all of us as world is so close in communication our views and teach us to respect each of individual freedom of worshipping and coustoms. hat off to you i think you have way to get the detail and it may not have wriiten 4000,year back but when mohamad was living in arab. its not like nosturdam ,s predictation which seems like comming true. so waht is guarantee that all that written in books is true my father use to say that first and last page of knowledge book is lost and f try to finding those two page all this is wriiten that why guru nana k said veda puran are all stories this word is vichar and ""vichar" thoght creat this word so we have to understand and controol our thoght to seek our real self. how we can change the fate of human life it was alwayws surrounded by war see geeta was written during mahabharta mohamad left jeehad in kuran guru gobind made week hindu lions to fight muslim ruler for thier cruelity so where is god the non voilence buddha look wonder ful when he preach ther is no God but you idol worshipp is not the way but moderation in everything and non voilence and sutras may give us nirvana, i want to take sanyasa if i find someone teacher like that credendial most of teacher come to temple in town i live seems are ful of desire like me when i came to usa , or they are not in peace they are selling to follower here i have five planet in 4th house one astrologer in kapurthala "punjab""told me i will get moksha this life i laugh at him as i dont desire it i am wordly . i was 19 and crazy those days and preparing to represent india in asian game in waterpolo.But astrologer words may this make me intrested in astrology later on it dawn that its not bad idea to go that way now i read one book that jupitor in capricorn in second house keep bhisma pitameh denounce the kingdom ,\ i do have jupitor in second house in capricorn but i really dont like to do what bhisma did i love my family and want to provide for their welfare and the astrolger said my sat in leo in 9th house give me suuden richness and i read it may give a political prison too. t rahu in fifth many sons but i am satisfy with one one thing true i seek company of wise where i could catch the peace they radiate to there surrounding. presence of sage last century bhagwan ramana seems to answer that search now he is no more here but may be in 4 yr when i retire i may have good luck to visit arunachala hill and breath the air where his presense may have impressions. my life though was roller coaster but on reflection i loved all of it and like bhisma i did help most of my nieces with money to bulid their home and my mother think it was too much as thier husbands spend lot,and i tell my mother its just previlaged to help if i was in india i may not have done this.and my nephew one grown up has a great job as senior information officer in indian govt and well off so he never ask help but i could have send him 15000 dollar for his home too,my brother keep on saying send him too and i told him he has to ask not you. thinking to get some land either in haridhwar or near arunachala holi hill and get old age spent in holi land my otherland india . is this all due to sun mahadasa in my horoscope i must have to see that astrologer in kapurthala hope he still alive he may be close to ninety now . thanks again ram --- KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM <munisevitham wrote: > Namaste, > > I also remember to have read on what you have said > here below,the following link may throw more light > on > the PAST HISTORY. > > http://answering-islam.org.uk/Mna/hindu.html > [Prophet Muhammad in Hindu Scriptures? > By M. N. Anderson > 1999 by M. N. Anderson.] > > Let us be all friends with our vedic friends. > > --- Rampaul Verma <rampaulman wrote: > > > you guys are so good about this time periods > > so is it true that bhavisya puran do talk about > > raja bhoj having some message sent to muhamad the > > prophet to take a dip in holy water ganges but > > melesha prophet refused as he said i will give > bath > > of blood to my follower > > i am not expert but i read on internet and could > not > > believe the puran has reference to muhamad as god > > men > > ranm > > > > Surya Ra o <suryarao12 wrote: > > Dear Sreenadhji, > > > > "Mohan Jyotishi" - name is a misnomer like "Vedic > > Astrology" - Mohan Jyotishi is not a so called > > Jyotishi practising astrology. He is a good > > astronomer and well read in all scriptures and > > thorough with the history of astronomy, Vedic, > > Babylonian, Parasara and Varaha, Garga etc. So he > > knows the time when Vedanga Jyotisha came into > > existence and the quote given of solstitial > points. > > He is a master in the history of the so called > Vedic > > Astronomy and so he is trying to derive some > > intellectual happiness here by lighting up the > > astrologers. > > > > So your painstaking efforts cannot convince him > that > > Parasara was of 1500 BC. 1500 BC is the date of > > Rgveda in India according to standard research. > > Harappa- Mohenjodaro (in the name of some past > Mohan > > Jyotishi?)/Sindhu Sarasvati Dravid civilization > > prevailed up to 1900 BC before the decline. > > Archaeology supports such conclusions. Vedic claim > > of Sanskrit glossary in Indus seals is being > > proclaimed as a fraud by Hindu and some internet > > resources. You can make a search of Indus script > and > > see the web pages of reputed Oxford researchers > who > > condemn the greatest discovery of Vedic India. > > > > So as on date the accepted notions place the > maximum > > antiquity of Vedic India at 1500 BC when nomads > > invaded India - according to Romila Thapar. > > > > So how can Parasara Samhita belong to 1500 BC? > Mohan > > Jyotishi knows all Sanskrit astronomical works. > You > > can see shades of Kashmiri Vedic background in his > > writings asin the case of Sri Avtar Krishen Kaul. > > > > To counter Mohanji, you have to find some Samhita > OR > > Siddhanta in Prakrt or Pisachi scripts. Lot more > of > > research is required. > > > > Surya Rao > > > > > > > > > > > > Sreenadh <sreelid wrote: > > Dear Mohan ji, > > (This mail is a continuation of my previous mail > to > > you) > > You asked: > > > the first thing I would like to know is how you > > > have arrived at the conclusions that Parashara > > Samhita > > > is of 1500 BCE. > > The following is my answer to that question: > > ================================ (Start of > article) > > Period of Parasara > > --------------------- > > When Parasara, the author of Parasara Sidhantha, > > Parasara Samhitha and > > Parasara Hora lived? Is it near to Mahabharatha > > period, which as per > > some scholars is near to BC. 3100? > > Or are these texts are written by some Parasara of > > the Parasara Kula > > of later age? > > It is a known fact that this Parasara is the son > of > > the Rishi called > > Sakthi who was also a well known person who wrote > > texts related to > > Astrology. There is a sloka in Parasara Samhita > > (quoted in the Vyakhya > > of Varaha Hora by Bhattolpala), which helps us in > > determining the > > period of Parasara, the author of BPHS. The sloka > is > > quoted below: > > Srevishtadyath poushnantham charatha sisiraH > > VasanthaH poushnanthyath rohinyantham > > Soumyadyath sarpardham greeshmaH > > Pravid sarpardhath dhasthantham > > Chithradyath indrardham sarth > > Hemantho Jyeshardhath vaishnavantham > > (Parasara Samhitha) > > This sloka indicates that at the time of Parasara, > > Utharayana was > > from the beginning of Dhanishta to the middle of > > Aslesha. That > > happened near to BC.1400 as per astronomical > > calculations. Therefore > > it is sure that Parasara Samhitha was written > around > > the period BC. > > 1400. Now the question is, can we be sure that > > Parasara Hora and > > Parasara Sidhantha was written by the same person? > > Yes, because it is > > said that Parasara wrote 3 books on astrology - > > Parasara Sidhanta, > > Parasara Samhitha and Parasara Hora. How? What is > > the proof? In the > > Vyakhya of Varaha Hora, Bhattolpala says: > > Parasara Samhitha kevalamasmabhir drishtam nathu > > jathakam > > Srooyathe skandha treyamithi Parasarasyethi. > > (Varaha Hora - Bhattolpala Vyakhya) > > Meaning, I have seen only Parasara Samhitha, and > > not Parasara Hora. > > But I have heard that Parasara had written books > for > > all the 3 > > skandhas (i.e. Sidhantha, Samhitha and Hora). > > From all these it is clear that Parasara of > BC.1400 > > has written 3 > > books, i.e. Parasara Sidhatha, Parasara Samhitha > and > > Parasara Hora. > > [The game of time and space are curious. I have 3 > > scholars in my mind > > while saying this - Bhattolpala (10th Century), > > Kaikulangara (17th > > Century) and Acharya Balabhadra (18th Century). > > Parasara Hora was not > > seen by Bhattolpala but Parasara Samhitha, > > Kaikulangara has seen > > Parasara Hora but not Parasara Samhitha, > Bhattolpala > > has seen Gargi > > Hora but not Kaikulangara, Balabhadra and > > Kaikulangara has seen Soura > > Hora (also known as Suryarunasamvadam or > > Sourajathakam) but not > > Bhattolpala. It all just means that some texts > that > > were not available > > in some parts of the country were available at > some > > other parts of the > > country at the same time. This may be the only > cause > > due to which > > Bhattolpala failed to see a copy of Parasara > Hora.] > > Now the question comes, Is this the Parasara who > was > > the originator > > of Parasara Kula? No, because in Mahabharatha > period > > (may be BC.3100) > > as well one Parasara lived. In > Brihadaranyopanishad, > > while describing > > the Acharya Paramparas the Rishi speaks about 3 > > Prarasaryas and 2 > === message truncated === Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.