Guest guest Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 Dear sir, Why do you say Kundalini activation is impossible in women? Can you please explain the reason for that? Regards, Jyothi vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" <amolmandar> wrote: > > Dear Vishnu and TV Rao Namste > > Activation of Chakras in female body is possible but no Kundalini > activation. > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > Prabodh Vekhande > Jai Jai Shankar > har Har Shankar > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > Dear Sri Rao garu, > > > > Yes, kundalini sakti is present in women too. > > > > warm regards, > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote: > > > > > > vedic astrology, "r_tv_99" > <tvrao_agd@s...> > > > wrote: > > > > > > respected gurus and members, > > > > > > in this thread only male anatomy is discussed with respect to > > > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me whether the kundalini > > > shakti is present in females or not? or it is only present in > males? > > > > > > tvr > > > > > > vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" > > > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear shri Vishnu > > > > > > > > Pls find my reply. > > > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep, > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pramana. > > > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two fingers below the > linga, > > > four fingers > > > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous root. > > > > > > b)This area is known as perenium.Thanks to Ms.SweeChan > ji.You > > > may kindly > > > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, space inbetween and > also > > > some > > > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area! > > > > > > > > > > Please follow this link to get a better understanding > > > > > > > > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html > > > > > > > > > > Instead of getting lost in these technical terms, why don't > we > > > start with > > > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black lines represent my > view > > > and the red > > > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls send those pictures to my id vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > > Now pls see the following > > > > > > > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male-pelvic- > > > organs.php > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm > > > > > > > > The part below navel called vasti contains the bladder and > other > > > pelvic organs and they are above the base of linga.They fall > under > > > Thula.Linga is below these organas. > > > > > > > > Combining these three pictures one can reach a sound > understanding > > > on where Mooladhara is. > > > > Front part will relate to perenium(area from scrotum until > anus) > > > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only this can correspond to > > > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 above Anus). > > > > > > > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics - Now how do you > place > > > this is in Libra? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a plane connecting anus > and > > > linga. > > > > > > This plane is slanted to the vertical axis.Where is > perenium.If > > > perenium > > > > > > is between anus and linga,how can you you place this in > > > Libra,where Anus and > > > > > > Linga are yet to start? > > > > > > By reading all these together,it is not at all difficult to > > > understand how > > > > > > mooladhara chakra ,hanging upside down,in the vicinity of > > > perenium & scrotum > > > > > > ,bordering thighs can be connected to Vrischika and Dhanu. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am unable to read your mind. Do me a favour and paint a > picture > > > of what > > > > > you have in your mind. > > > > > > > > > > Chandrahari did not conclude based on an assumption(as many > astro > > > > > > ''scholars'' are framing theories) -''oh moolam and > mooldharam > > > rhymes -let > > > > > > me make a theory''. > > > > > > > > > > > > Meaning,symbolism,astrological parallels,nakshathra and > rashi > > > > > > significations,& pramana defining mooladharam reinforced by > > > > > > researches lasting numerous years,resulted in such a > conclusion. > > > > > > But on the other hand Shri Narasimha is simply making a > > > statement - ''for > > > > > > me, i can confidently say Mooladharam of Kalapurusha is in > > > Libra''.Most > > > > > > interestingly he is confidently giving full list of > chakras,at > > > equidistant > > > > > > intervals. > > > > > > > > > > > Whether chakras are equidistant or not only more research and > > > time will > > > > > tell, it is a very fertile ground for research. On the other > > > hand, you > > > > > haven't provided any map whatsoever. I place the burden of > proof > > > on your > > > > > head, provide a complete map of chakras and prove that > chakras > > > are at > > > > > un-equal intervals! > > > > > > > > If i dont know about something -i have a simple answer.And that > > > is ''I don't Know''.I do not map all the chakras to various > signs,in > > > haste.Throat is Taurus(speech ,vocal cord should fall under 2nd > > > house) -this is basic knoweldge,and how can one map this on to > Gemini > > > (hands,arms,shoulder -bahu) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards, > > > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > PS: - If you have something against Sri.Narasimha, it is > better > > > you trash it > > > > > out with him. It does you no good to deride and incur bad > karma, > > > with each > > > > > and every post, does it? We are all in search of the same > light, > > > he has > > > > > genuinely expressed his opinions and you did yours(w.r.t > varga > > > charts), end > > > > > of story! > > > > > > > > Agreed.But you are not asking shri Narasimha to provide > diagrams.I > > > do not think this can incur bad karma.I have only good > > > intentions.Shri Narasimha is not saying ''he thinks'' -he says he > > > is ''confident'' and making theories.We are all in search of the > same > > > light -but if one among our friends is not ready to listen - we > have > > > to help him.We will first try to convince him using soft > words.If it > > > is not working we have to be firm.I feel i am not wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > > > > tatpadam darsita yena > > > > > tasmai sri gurave namah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > astrology/info.html > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > - Visit your group "vedic- > astrology<vedic astrology>" > > > on the web. > > > > > > - > > > vedic astrology<vedic astrology- > ?subject=Un> > > > > > > - Terms of > > > Service <>. > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > tatpadam darsita yena > > tasmai sri gurave namaha > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 Namaste all, I don't think Prabodh is right at all. Kundalini can wake up and rise in women also. Regarding another mail from you, yes, chakras represent various levels that consciousness has to climb before reaching liberation. That way they are abstract. The mapping to signs was based on the location of the corresponding energy centers in the body. You asked if it was necessary to map chakras to signs. It is not necessary. But it should be possible. More than signs, I would map them to houses. Don't ask me whether I would map them to houses from lagna or another reference such as bhava lagna, as chakras belong to the subtle body and not the gross body. We were discussing Kalapurusha's chakras and hence we ended up using rasis instead of houses. A group of people felt that Kalapurusha's Mooladhara chakra was in Moola nakshatram in Sg and that is how this whole discussion started. Been busy and cannot write anything more.. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha ------------------------------- Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org ------------------------------- > Dear sir,> > Why do you say Kundalini activation is impossible in > women? Can you please explain the reason for that?> > > Regards,> Jyothi> > vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" > <amolmandar> wrote:> >> > Dear Vishnu and TV Rao Namste> > > > Activation of Chakras in female body is possible but no Kundalini > > activation.> > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.> > > > Prabodh Vekhande> > Jai Jai Shankar> > har Har Shankar> > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote:> > >> > > || Hare Rama Krishna ||> > > > > > Dear Sri Rao garu,> > > > > > Yes, kundalini sakti is present in women too.> > > > > > warm regards,> > > Vishnu> > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote:> > > >> > > > vedic astrology, "r_tv_99" > > <tvrao_agd@s...>> > > > wrote:> > > >> > > > respected gurus and members,> > > >> > > > in this thread only male anatomy is discussed with respect to> > > > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me whether the > kundalini> > > > shakti is present in females or not? or it is only present in > > males?> > > >> > > > tvr> > > >> > > > --- In vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep"> > > > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote:> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Dear shri Vishnu> > > > >> > > > > Pls find my reply.> > > > >> > > > > Pradeep> > > > > --- In vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala> > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna ||> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep,> > > > > >> > > > > > Namaste,> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Pramana.> > > > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two fingers below the > > linga,> > > > four fingers> > > > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous root.> > > > > > > b)This area is known as perenium.Thanks to Ms.SweeChan > > ji.You> > > > may kindly> > > > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all are.> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, space inbetween and > > also> > > > some> > > > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area!> > > > > >> > > > > > Please follow this link to get a better understanding> > > > > >> > > > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html> > > > > >> > > > > > Instead of getting lost in these technical terms, why don't > > we> > > > start with> > > > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black lines represent my > > view> > > > and the red> > > > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please correct.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Pls send those pictures to my id vijayadas_pradeep> > > > >> > > > > Now pls see the following> > > > >> > > > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male-pelvic-> > > > organs.php> > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm> > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm> > > > >> > > > > The part below navel called vasti contains the bladder and > > other> > > > pelvic organs and they are above the base of linga.They fall > > under> > > > Thula.Linga is below these organas.> > > > >> > > > > Combining these three pictures one can reach a sound > > understanding> > > > on where Mooladhara is.> > > > > Front part will relate to perenium(area from scrotum until > > anus)> > > > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only this can correspond to> > > > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 above Anus).> > > > >> > > > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics - Now how do you > > place> > > > this is in Libra?> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a plane connecting anus > > and> > > > linga.> > > > > > > This plane is slanted to the vertical axis.Where is > > perenium.If> > > > perenium> > > > > > > is between anus and linga,how can you you place this in> > > > Libra,where Anus and> > > > > > > Linga are yet to start?> > > > > > > By reading all these together,it is not at all difficult > to> > > > understand how> > > > > > > mooladhara chakra ,hanging upside down,in the vicinity of> > > > perenium & scrotum> > > > > > > ,bordering thighs can be connected to Vrischika and Dhanu.> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > I am unable to read your mind. Do me a favour and paint a > > picture> > > > of what> > > > > > you have in your mind.> > > > > >> > > > > > Chandrahari did not conclude based on an assumption(as many > > astro> > > > > > > ''scholars'' are framing theories) -''oh moolam and > > mooldharam> > > > rhymes -let> > > > > > > me make a theory''.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Meaning,symbolism,astrological parallels,nakshathra and > > rashi> > > > > > > significations,& pramana defining mooladharam reinforced > by> > > > > > > researches lasting numerous years,resulted in such a > > conclusion.> > > > > > > But on the other hand Shri Narasimha is simply making a> > > > statement - ''for> > > > > > > me, i can confidently say Mooladharam of Kalapurusha is in> > > > Libra''.Most> > > > > > > interestingly he is confidently giving full list of > > chakras,at> > > > equidistant> > > > > > > intervals.> > > > > > >> > > > > > Whether chakras are equidistant or not only more research > and> > > > time will> > > > > > tell, it is a very fertile ground for research. On the other> > > > hand, you> > > > > > haven't provided any map whatsoever. I place the burden of > > proof> > > > on your> > > > > > head, provide a complete map of chakras and prove that > > chakras> > > > are at> > > > > > un-equal intervals!> > > > >> > > > > If i dont know about something -i have a simple answer.And > that> > > > is ''I don't Know''.I do not map all the chakras to various > > signs,in> > > > haste.Throat is Taurus(speech ,vocal cord should fall under 2nd> > > > house) -this is basic knoweldge,and how can one map this on to > > Gemini> > > > (hands,arms,shoulder -bahu)> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > warm regards,> > > > > > Vishnu> > > > > >> > > > > > PS: - If you have something against Sri.Narasimha, it is > > better> > > > you trash it> > > > > > out with him. It does you no good to deride and incur bad > > karma,> > > > with each> > > > > > and every post, does it? We are all in search of the same > > light,> > > > he has> > > > > > genuinely expressed his opinions and you did yours(w.r.t > > varga> > > > charts), end> > > > > > of story!> > > > >> > > > > Agreed.But you are not asking shri Narasimha to provide > > diagrams.I> > > > do not think this can incur bad karma.I have only good> > > > intentions.Shri Narasimha is not saying ''he thinks'' -he says > he> > > > is ''confident'' and making theories.We are all in search of > the > > same> > > > light -but if one among our friends is not ready to listen - we > > have> > > > to help him.We will first try to convince him using soft > > words.If it> > > > is not working we have to be firm.I feel i am not wrong.> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > --> > > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram> > > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam> > > > > > tatpadam darsita yena> > > > > > tasmai sri gurave namah> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > --- End forwarded message ---> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Archives: vedic astrology> > > >> > > > Group info: vedic-> > astrology/info.html> > > >> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > > > >> > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ........> > > >> > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------------------------> > > > ! GROUPS LINKS> > > >> > > >> > > > - Visit your group "vedic-> > astrology<vedic astrology>"> > > > on the web.> > > >> > > > - > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 Respected Sir, Thanks a lot for letting know your opinion on Kunadalini Awakening in women. Regarding other mails, I am extremely sorry for the distraction caused in midst of your busy schedule. Regards, Jyothi vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@c...> wrote: > > Namaste all, > > I don't think Prabodh is right at all. Kundalini can wake up and rise in women also. > > Regarding another mail from you, yes, chakras represent various levels that consciousness has to climb before reaching liberation. That way they are abstract. The mapping to signs was based on the location of the corresponding energy centers in the body. You asked if it was necessary to map chakras to signs. It is not necessary. But it should be possible. > > More than signs, I would map them to houses. Don't ask me whether I would map them to houses from lagna or another reference such as bhava lagna, as chakras belong to the subtle body and not the gross body. > > We were discussing Kalapurusha's chakras and hence we ended up using rasis instead of houses. A group of people felt that Kalapurusha's Mooladhara chakra was in Moola nakshatram in Sg and that is how this whole discussion started. > > Been busy and cannot write anything more.. > > May Jupiter's light shine on us, > Narasimha > ------------------------------- > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > ------------------------------- > > > Dear sir, > > > > Why do you say Kundalini activation is impossible in > > women? Can you please explain the reason for that? > > > > > > Regards, > > Jyothi > > > > vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" > > <amolmandar> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Vishnu and TV Rao Namste > > > > > > Activation of Chakras in female body is possible but no Kundalini > > > activation. > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > > > > > Prabodh Vekhande > > > Jai Jai Shankar > > > har Har Shankar > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Rao garu, > > > > > > > > Yes, kundalini sakti is present in women too. > > > > > > > > warm regards, > > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "r_tv_99" > > > <tvrao_agd@s...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > respected gurus and members, > > > > > > > > > > in this thread only male anatomy is discussed with respect to > > > > > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me whether the > > kundalini > > > > > shakti is present in females or not? or it is only present in > > > males? > > > > > > > > > > tvr > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear shri Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls find my reply. > > > > > > > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pramana. > > > > > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two fingers below the > > > linga, > > > > > four fingers > > > > > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous root. > > > > > > > > b)This area is known as perenium.Thanks to Ms.SweeChan > > > ji.You > > > > > may kindly > > > > > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, space inbetween and > > > also > > > > > some > > > > > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please follow this link to get a better understanding > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of getting lost in these technical terms, why don't > > > we > > > > > start with > > > > > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black lines represent my > > > view > > > > > and the red > > > > > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls send those pictures to my id vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > Now pls see the following > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male- pelvic- > > > > > organs.php > > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm > > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > The part below navel called vasti contains the bladder and > > > other > > > > > pelvic organs and they are above the base of linga.They fall > > > under > > > > > Thula.Linga is below these organas. > > > > > > > > > > > > Combining these three pictures one can reach a sound > > > understanding > > > > > on where Mooladhara is. > > > > > > Front part will relate to perenium(area from scrotum until > > > anus) > > > > > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only this can correspond to > > > > > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 above Anus). > > > > > > > > > > > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics - Now how do you > > > place > > > > > this is in Libra? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a plane connecting anus > > > and > > > > > linga. > > > > > > > > This plane is slanted to the vertical axis.Where is > > > perenium.If > > > > > perenium > > > > > > > > is between anus and linga,how can you you place this in > > > > > Libra,where Anus and > > > > > > > > Linga are yet to start? > > > > > > > > By reading all these together,it is not at all difficult > > to > > > > > understand how > > > > > > > > mooladhara chakra ,hanging upside down,in the vicinity of > > > > > perenium & scrotum > > > > > > > > ,bordering thighs can be connected to Vrischika and Dhanu. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am unable to read your mind. Do me a favour and paint a > > > picture > > > > > of what > > > > > > > you have in your mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandrahari did not conclude based on an assumption(as many > > > astro > > > > > > > > ''scholars'' are framing theories) -''oh moolam and > > > mooldharam > > > > > rhymes -let > > > > > > > > me make a theory''. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Meaning,symbolism,astrological parallels,nakshathra and > > > rashi > > > > > > > > significations,& pramana defining mooladharam reinforced > > by > > > > > > > > researches lasting numerous years,resulted in such a > > > conclusion. > > > > > > > > But on the other hand Shri Narasimha is simply making a > > > > > statement - ''for > > > > > > > > me, i can confidently say Mooladharam of Kalapurusha is in > > > > > Libra''.Most > > > > > > > > interestingly he is confidently giving full list of > > > chakras,at > > > > > equidistant > > > > > > > > intervals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whether chakras are equidistant or not only more research > > and > > > > > time will > > > > > > > tell, it is a very fertile ground for research. On the other > > > > > hand, you > > > > > > > haven't provided any map whatsoever. I place the burden of > > > proof > > > > > on your > > > > > > > head, provide a complete map of chakras and prove that > > > chakras > > > > > are at > > > > > > > un-equal intervals! > > > > > > > > > > > > If i dont know about something -i have a simple answer.And > > that > > > > > is ''I don't Know''.I do not map all the chakras to various > > > signs,in > > > > > haste.Throat is Taurus(speech ,vocal cord should fall under 2nd > > > > > house) -this is basic knoweldge,and how can one map this on to > > > Gemini > > > > > (hands,arms,shoulder -bahu) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards, > > > > > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PS: - If you have something against Sri.Narasimha, it is > > > better > > > > > you trash it > > > > > > > out with him. It does you no good to deride and incur bad > > > karma, > > > > > with each > > > > > > > and every post, does it? We are all in search of the same > > > light, > > > > > he has > > > > > > > genuinely expressed his opinions and you did yours (w.r.t > > > varga > > > > > charts), end > > > > > > > of story! > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed.But you are not asking shri Narasimha to provide > > > diagrams.I > > > > > do not think this can incur bad karma.I have only good > > > > > intentions.Shri Narasimha is not saying ''he thinks'' -he says > > he > > > > > is ''confident'' and making theories.We are all in search of > > the > > > same > > > > > light -but if one among our friends is not ready to listen - we > > > have > > > > > to help him.We will first try to convince him using soft > > > words.If it > > > > > is not working we have to be firm.I feel i am not wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > > > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > > > > > > tatpadam darsita yena > > > > > > > tasmai sri gurave namah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > > > astrology/info.html > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Visit your group "vedic- > > > astrology<vedic astrology>" > > > > > on the web. > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > vedic astrology<vedic- astrology- > > > ?subject=Un> > > > > > > > > > > - Terms > > of > > > > > Service <>. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > > > tatpadam darsita yena > > > > tasmai sri gurave namaha > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > <jvishnu@g...> wrote:> >> > || Hare Rama Krishna ||> > > > Dear Sri Rao garu,> > > > Yes, kundalini sakti is present in women too.> > > > warm regards,> > Vishnu> > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote:> > >> > > --- In vedic astrology, "r_tv_99" > <tvrao_agd@s...>> > > wrote:> > >> > > respected gurus and members,> > >> > > in this thread only male anatomy is discussed with respect to> > > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me whether the kundalini> > > shakti is present in females or not? or it is only present in > males?> > >> > > tvr> > >> > > --- In vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep"> > > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote:> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear shri Vishnu> > > >> > > > Pls find my reply.> > > >> > > > Pradeep> > > > --- In vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala> > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna ||> > > > >> > > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep,> > > > >> > > > > Namaste,> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Pramana.> > > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two fingers below the > linga,> > > four fingers> > > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous root.> > > > > > b)This area is known as perenium.Thanks to Ms.SweeChan > ji.You> > > may kindly> > > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all are.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, space inbetween and > also> > > some> > > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area!> > > > >> > > > > Please follow this link to get a better understanding> > > > >> > > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html> > > > >> > > > > Instead of getting lost in these technical terms, why don't > we> > > start with> > > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black lines represent my > view> > > and the red> > > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please correct.> > > > >> > > >> > > > Pls send those pictures to my id vijayadas_pradeep> > > >> > > > Now pls see the following> > > >> > > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male-pelvic-> > > organs.php> > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm> > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm> > > >> > > > The part below navel called vasti contains the bladder and > other> > > pelvic organs and they are above the base of linga.They fall > under> > > Thula.Linga is below these organas.> > > >> > > > Combining these three pictures one can reach a sound > understanding> > > on where Mooladhara is.> > > > Front part will relate to perenium(area from scrotum until > anus)> > > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only this can correspond to> > > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 above Anus).> > > >> > > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics - Now how do you > place> > > this is in Libra?> > > >> > > > >> > > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a plane connecting anus > and> > > linga.> > > > > > This plane is slanted to the vertical axis.Where is > perenium.If> > > perenium> > > > > > is between anus and linga,how can you you place this in> > > Libra,where Anus and> > > > > > Linga are yet to start?> > > > > > By reading all these together,it is not at all difficult to> > > understand how> > > > > > mooladhara chakra ,hanging upside down,in the vicinity of> > > perenium & scrotum> > > > > > ,bordering thighs can be connected to Vrischika and Dhanu.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > I am unable to read your mind. Do me a favour and paint a > picture> > > of what> > > > > you have in your mind.> > > > >> > > > > Chandrahari did not conclude based on an assumption(as many > astro> > > > > > ''scholars'' are framing theories) -''oh moolam and > mooldharam> > > rhymes -let> > > > > > me make a theory''.> > > > > >> > > > > > Meaning,symbolism,astrological parallels,nakshathra and > rashi> > > > > > significations,& pramana defining mooladharam reinforced by> > > > > > researches lasting numerous years,resulted in such a > conclusion.> > > > > > But on the other hand Shri Narasimha is simply making a> > > statement - ''for> > > > > > me, i can confidently say Mooladharam of Kalapurusha is in> > > Libra''.Most> > > > > > interestingly he is confidently giving full list of > chakras,at> > > equidistant> > > > > > intervals.> > > > > >> > > > > Whether chakras are equidistant or not only more research and> > > time will> > > > > tell, it is a very fertile ground for research. On the other> > > hand, you> > > > > haven't provided any map whatsoever. I place the burden of > proof> > > on your> > > > > head, provide a complete map of chakras and prove that > chakras> > > are at> > > > > un-equal intervals!> > > >> > > > If i dont know about something -i have a simple answer.And that> > > is ''I don't Know''.I do not map all the chakras to various > signs,in> > > haste.Throat is Taurus(speech ,vocal cord should fall under 2nd> > > house) -this is basic knoweldge,and how can one map this on to > Gemini> > > (hands,arms,shoulder -bahu)> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > warm regards,> > > > > Vishnu> > > > >> > > > > PS: - If you have something against Sri.Narasimha, it is > better> > > you trash it> > > > > out with him. It does you no good to deride and incur bad > karma,> > > with each> > > > > and every post, does it? We are all in search of the same > light,> > > he has> > > > > genuinely expressed his opinions and you did yours(w.r.t > varga> > > charts), end> > > > > of story!> > > >> > > > Agreed.But you are not asking shri Narasimha to provide > diagrams.I> > > do not think this can incur bad karma.I have only good> > > intentions.Shri Narasimha is not saying ''he thinks'' -he says he> > > is ''confident'' and making theories.We are all in search of the > same> > > light -but if one among our friends is not ready to listen - we > have> > > to help him.We will first try to convince him using soft > words.If it> > > is not working we have to be firm.I feel i am not wrong.> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > --> > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram> > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam> > > > > tatpadam darsita yena> > > > > tasmai sri gurave namah> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > --- End forwarded message ---> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Archives: vedic astrology> > >> > > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > >> > >> > > ------------------------------> > > > > >> > >> > > - Visit your group "vedic-> astrology<vedic astrology>"> > > on the web.> > >> > > - > > > vedic astrology<vedic astrology-> ?subject=Un>> > >> > > - Your use of is subject to the Terms of> > > Service <>.> > >> > >> > > ------------------------------> > >> > > > > > > > --> > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram> > vyaptam yena charaa charam> > tatpadam darsita yena> > tasmai sri gurave namaha> >> Shopping Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Shopping Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 sir, Why do you say Kundalini activation is impossible in women? Can you please explain the reason for that?Regards,Jyothi--- In vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" <amolmandar> wrote:>> Dear Vishnu and TV Rao Namste> > Activation of Chakras in female body is possible but no Kundalini > activation.> > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.> > Prabodh Vekhande> Jai Jai Shankar> har Har Shankar> > > --- In vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > <jvishnu@g...> wrote:> >> > || Hare Rama Krishna ||> > > > Dear Sri Rao garu,> > > > Yes, kundalini sakti is present in women too.> > > > warm regards,> > Vishnu> > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote:> > >> > > --- In vedic astrology, "r_tv_99" > <tvrao_agd@s...>> > > wrote:> > >> > > respected gurus and members,> > >> > > in this thread only male anatomy is discussed with respect to> > > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me whether the kundalini> > > shakti is present in females or not? or it is only present in > males?> > >> > > tvr> > >> > > --- In vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep"> > > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote:> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear shri Vishnu> > > >> > > > Pls find my reply.> > > >> > > > Pradeep> > > > --- In vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala> > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna ||> > > > >> > > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep,> > > > >> > > > > Namaste,> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Pramana.> > > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two fingers below the > linga,> > > four fingers> > > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous root.> > > > > > b)This area is known as perenium.Thanks to Ms.SweeChan > ji.You> > > may kindly> > > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all are.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, space inbetween and > also> > > some> > > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area!> > > > >> > > > > Please follow this link to get a better understanding> > > > >> > > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html> > > > >> > > > > Instead of getting lost in these technical terms, why don't > we> > > start with> > > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black lines represent my > view> > > and the red> > > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please correct.> > > > >> > > >> > > > Pls send those pictures to my id vijayadas_pradeep> > > >> > > > Now pls see the following> > > >> > > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male-pelvic-> > > organs.php> > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm> > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm> > > >> > > > The part below navel called vasti contains the bladder and > other> > > pelvic organs and they are above the base of linga.They fall > under> > > Thula.Linga is below these organas.> > > >> > > > Combining these three pictures one can reach a sound > understanding> > > on where Mooladhara is.> > > > Front part will relate to perenium(area from scrotum until > anus)> > > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only this can correspond to> > > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 above Anus).> > > >> > > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics - Now how do you > place> > > this is in Libra?> > > >> > > > >> > > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a plane connecting anus > and> > > linga.> > > > > > This plane is slanted to the vertical axis.Where is > perenium.If> > > perenium> > > > > > is between anus and linga,how can you you place this in> > > Libra,where Anus and> > > > > > Linga are yet to start?> > > > > > By reading all these together,it is not at all difficult to> > > understand how> > > > > > mooladhara chakra ,hanging upside down,in the vicinity of> > > perenium & scrotum> > > > > > ,bordering thighs can be connected to Vrischika and Dhanu.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > I am unable to read your mind. Do me a favour and paint a > picture> > > of what> > > > > you have in your mind.> > > > >> > > > > Chandrahari did not conclude based on an assumption(as many > astro> > > > > > ''scholars'' are framing theories) -''oh moolam and > mooldharam> > > rhymes -let> > > > > > me make a theory''.> > > > > >> > > > > > Meaning,symbolism,astrological parallels,nakshathra and > rashi> > > > > > significations,& pramana defining mooladharam reinforced by> > > > > > researches lasting numerous years,resulted in such a > conclusion.> > > > > > But on the other hand Shri Narasimha is simply making a> > > statement - ''for> > > > > > me, i can confidently say Mooladharam of Kalapurusha is in> > > Libra''.Most> > > > > > interestingly he is confidently giving full list of > chakras,at> > > equidistant> > > > > > intervals.> > > > > >> > > > > Whether chakras are equidistant or not only more research and> > > time will> > > > > tell, it is a very fertile ground for research. On the other> > > hand, you> > > > > haven't provided any map whatsoever. I place the burden of > proof> > > on your> > > > > head, provide a complete map of chakras and prove that > chakras> > > are at> > > > > un-equal intervals!> > > >> > > > If i dont know about something -i have a simple answer.And that> > > is ''I don't Know''.I do not map all the chakras to various > signs,in> > > haste.Throat is Taurus(speech ,vocal cord should fall under 2nd> > > house) -this is basic knoweldge,and how can one map this on to > Gemini> > > (hands,arms,shoulder -bahu)> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > warm regards,> > > > > Vishnu> > > > >> > > > > PS: - If you have something against Sri.Narasimha, it is > better> > > you trash it> > > > > out with him. It does you no good to deride and incur bad > karma,> > > with each> > > > > and every post, does it? We are all in search of the same > light,> > > he has> > > > > genuinely expressed his opinions and you did yours(w.r.t > varga> > > charts), end> > > > > of story!> > > >> > > > Agreed.But you are not asking shri Narasimha to provide > diagrams.I> > > do not think this can incur bad karma.I have only good> > > intentions.Shri Narasimha is not saying ''he thinks'' -he says he> > > is ''confident'' and making theories.We are all in search of the > same> > > light -but if one among our friends is not ready to listen - we > have> > > to help him.We will first try to convince him using soft > words.If it> > > is not working we have to be firm.I feel i am not wrong.> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > --> > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram> > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam> > > > > tatpadam darsita yena> > > > > tasmai sri gurave namah> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > --- End forwarded message ---> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Archives: vedic astrology> > >> > > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ........> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > ------------------------------> > > > > >> > >> > > - Visit your group "vedic-> astrology<vedic astrology>"> > > on the web.> > >> > > - > > > vedic astrology<vedic astrology-> ?subject=Un>> > >> > > - Terms of> > > Service <>.> > >> > >> > > ------------------------------> > >> > > > > > > > --> > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram> > vyaptam yena charaa charam> > tatpadam darsita yena> > tasmai sri gurave namaha> >> ShoppingFind Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Shopping Shopping Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Shopping Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Share Posted December 8, 2005 > > warm regards,> > Vishnu> > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote:> > >> > > vedic astrology, "r_tv_99" > <tvrao_agd@s...>> > > wrote:> > >> > > respected gurus and members,> > >> > > in this thread only male anatomy is discussed with respect to> > > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me whether the kundalini> > > shakti is present in females or not? or it is only present in > males?> > >> > > tvr> > >> > > vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep"> > > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote:> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear shri Vishnu> > > >> > > > Pls find my reply.> > > >> > > > Pradeep> > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala> > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna ||> > > > >> > > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep,> > > > >> > > > > Namaste,> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Pramana.> > > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two fingers below the > linga,> > > four fingers> > > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous root.> > > > > > b)This area is known as perenium.Thanks to Ms.SweeChan > ji.You> > > may kindly> > > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all are.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, space inbetween and > also> > > some> > > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area!> > > > >> > > > > Please follow this link to get a better understanding> > > > >> > > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html> > > > >> > > > > Instead of getting lost in these technical terms, why don't > we> > > start with> > > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black lines represent my > view> > > and the red> > > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please correct.> > > > >> > > >> > > > Pls send those pictures to my id vijayadas_pradeep> > > >> > > > Now pls see the following> > > >> > > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male-pelvic-> > > organs.php> > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm> > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm> > > >> > > > The part below navel called vasti contains the bladder and > other> > > pelvic organs and they are above the base of linga.They fall > under> > > Thula.Linga is below these organas.> > > >> > > > Combining these three pictures one can reach a sound > understanding> > > on where Mooladhara is.> > > > Front part will relate to perenium(area from scrotum until > anus)> > > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only this can correspond to> > > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 above Anus).> > > >> > > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics - Now how do you > place> > > this is in Libra?> > > >> > > > >> > > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a plane connecting anus > and> > > linga.> > > > > > This plane is slanted to the vertical axis.Where is > perenium.If> > > perenium> > > > > > is between anus and linga,how can you you place this in> > > Libra,where Anus and> > > > > > Linga are yet to start?> > > > > > By reading all these together,it is not at all difficult to> > > understand how> > > > > > mooladhara chakra ,hanging upside down,in the vicinity of> > > perenium & scrotum> > > > > > ,bordering thighs can be connected to Vrischika and Dhanu.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > I am unable to read your mind. Do me a favour and paint a > picture> > > of what> > > > > you have in your mind.> > > > >> > > > > Chandrahari did not conclude based on an assumption(as many > astro> > > > > > ''scholars'' are framing theories) -''oh moolam and > mooldharam> > > rhymes -let> > > > > > me make a theory''.> > > > > >> > > > > > Meaning,symbolism,astrological parallels,nakshathra and > rashi> > > > > > significations,& pramana defining mooladharam reinforced by> > > > > > researches lasting numerous years,resulted in such a > conclusion.> > > > > > But on the other hand Shri Narasimha is simply making a> > > statement - ''for> > > > > > me, i can confidently say Mooladharam of Kalapurusha is in> > > Libra''.Most> > > > > > interestingly he is confidently giving full list of > chakras,at> > > equidistant> > > > > > intervals.> > > > > >> > > > > Whether chakras are equidistant or not only more research and> > > time will> > > > > tell, it is a very fertile ground for research. On the other> > > hand, you> > > > > haven't provided any map whatsoever. I place the burden of > proof> > > on your> > > > > head, provide a complete map of chakras and prove that > chakras> > > are at> > > > > un-equal intervals!> > > >> > > > If i dont know about something -i have a simple answer.And that> > > is ''I don't Know''.I do not map all the chakras to various > signs,in> > > haste.Throat is Taurus(speech ,vocal cord should fall under 2nd> > > house) -this is basic knoweldge,and how can one map this on to > Gemini> > > (hands,arms,shoulder -bahu)> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > warm regards,> > > > > Vishnu> > > > >> > > > > PS: - If you have something against Sri.Narasimha, it is > better> > > you trash it> > > > > out with him. It does you no good to deride and incur bad > karma,> > > with each> > > > > and every post, does it? We are all in search of the same > light,> > > he has> > > > > genuinely expressed his opinions and you did yours(w.r.t > varga> > > charts), end> > > > > of story!> > > >> > > > Agreed.But you are not asking shri Narasimha to provide > diagrams.I> > > do not think this can incur bad karma.I have only good> > > intentions.Shri Narasimha is not saying ''he thinks'' -he says he> > > is ''confident'' and making theories.We are all in search of the > same> > > light -but if one among our friends is not ready to listen - we > have> > > to help him.We will first try to convince him using soft > words.If it> > > is not working we have to be firm.I feel i am not wrong.> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > --> > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram> > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam> > > > > tatpadam darsita yena> > > > > tasmai sri gurave namah> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > --- End forwarded message ---> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Archives: vedic astrology> > >> > > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > >> > >> > > ------------------------------> > > > > >> > >> > > - Visit your group "vedic-> astrology<vedic astrology>"> > > on the web.> > >> > > - > > > vedic astrology<vedic astrology-> ?subject=Un>> > >> > > - Terms of> > > Service <>.> > >> > >> > > ------------------------------> > >> > > > > > > > --> > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram> > vyaptam yena charaa charam> > tatpadam darsita yena> > tasmai sri gurave namaha> >> ShoppingFind Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Shopping India Matrimony: Find your partner now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Share Posted December 8, 2005 Dear Jyotiji & All Namaste When I said that women will not have kundalini activation I did not mean to belittle them. I respect all women. All the people whom I met who had Kundalini activation have told me that women are not allowed into this. I never dared to ask why but I can guess. If anybody has a case of woman kundalini activation it would be interesting to read the expirences. Another point, I have not read /met any Hatyogi with a female diciple. If anybody knows such Hatyogi guru please let me know. I will be very much thankful. Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. Prabodh Vekhande Jai Jai Shankar Har Har Shankar vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi" <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote: > > Dear sir, > > Why do you say Kundalini activation is impossible in > women? Can you please explain the reason for that? > > > Regards, > Jyothi > > vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" > <amolmandar> wrote: > > > > Dear Vishnu and TV Rao Namste > > > > Activation of Chakras in female body is possible but no Kundalini > > activation. > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > > > Prabodh Vekhande > > Jai Jai Shankar > > har Har Shankar > > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > Dear Sri Rao garu, > > > > > > Yes, kundalini sakti is present in women too. > > > > > > warm regards, > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote: > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "r_tv_99" > > <tvrao_agd@s...> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > respected gurus and members, > > > > > > > > in this thread only male anatomy is discussed with respect to > > > > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me whether the > kundalini > > > > shakti is present in females or not? or it is only present in > > males? > > > > > > > > tvr > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear shri Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > Pls find my reply. > > > > > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep, > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pramana. > > > > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two fingers below the > > linga, > > > > four fingers > > > > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous root. > > > > > > > b)This area is known as perenium.Thanks to Ms.SweeChan > > ji.You > > > > may kindly > > > > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, space inbetween and > > also > > > > some > > > > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area! > > > > > > > > > > > > Please follow this link to get a better understanding > > > > > > > > > > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of getting lost in these technical terms, why don't > > we > > > > start with > > > > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black lines represent my > > view > > > > and the red > > > > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls send those pictures to my id vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > > > > Now pls see the following > > > > > > > > > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male- pelvic- > > > > organs.php > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm > > > > > > > > > > The part below navel called vasti contains the bladder and > > other > > > > pelvic organs and they are above the base of linga.They fall > > under > > > > Thula.Linga is below these organas. > > > > > > > > > > Combining these three pictures one can reach a sound > > understanding > > > > on where Mooladhara is. > > > > > Front part will relate to perenium(area from scrotum until > > anus) > > > > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only this can correspond to > > > > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 above Anus). > > > > > > > > > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics - Now how do you > > place > > > > this is in Libra? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a plane connecting anus > > and > > > > linga. > > > > > > > This plane is slanted to the vertical axis.Where is > > perenium.If > > > > perenium > > > > > > > is between anus and linga,how can you you place this in > > > > Libra,where Anus and > > > > > > > Linga are yet to start? > > > > > > > By reading all these together,it is not at all difficult > to > > > > understand how > > > > > > > mooladhara chakra ,hanging upside down,in the vicinity of > > > > perenium & scrotum > > > > > > > ,bordering thighs can be connected to Vrischika and Dhanu. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am unable to read your mind. Do me a favour and paint a > > picture > > > > of what > > > > > > you have in your mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandrahari did not conclude based on an assumption(as many > > astro > > > > > > > ''scholars'' are framing theories) -''oh moolam and > > mooldharam > > > > rhymes -let > > > > > > > me make a theory''. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Meaning,symbolism,astrological parallels,nakshathra and > > rashi > > > > > > > significations,& pramana defining mooladharam reinforced > by > > > > > > > researches lasting numerous years,resulted in such a > > conclusion. > > > > > > > But on the other hand Shri Narasimha is simply making a > > > > statement - ''for > > > > > > > me, i can confidently say Mooladharam of Kalapurusha is in > > > > Libra''.Most > > > > > > > interestingly he is confidently giving full list of > > chakras,at > > > > equidistant > > > > > > > intervals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whether chakras are equidistant or not only more research > and > > > > time will > > > > > > tell, it is a very fertile ground for research. On the other > > > > hand, you > > > > > > haven't provided any map whatsoever. I place the burden of > > proof > > > > on your > > > > > > head, provide a complete map of chakras and prove that > > chakras > > > > are at > > > > > > un-equal intervals! > > > > > > > > > > If i dont know about something -i have a simple answer.And > that > > > > is ''I don't Know''.I do not map all the chakras to various > > signs,in > > > > haste.Throat is Taurus(speech ,vocal cord should fall under 2nd > > > > house) -this is basic knoweldge,and how can one map this on to > > Gemini > > > > (hands,arms,shoulder -bahu) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards, > > > > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > PS: - If you have something against Sri.Narasimha, it is > > better > > > > you trash it > > > > > > out with him. It does you no good to deride and incur bad > > karma, > > > > with each > > > > > > and every post, does it? We are all in search of the same > > light, > > > > he has > > > > > > genuinely expressed his opinions and you did yours(w.r.t > > varga > > > > charts), end > > > > > > of story! > > > > > > > > > > Agreed.But you are not asking shri Narasimha to provide > > diagrams.I > > > > do not think this can incur bad karma.I have only good > > > > intentions.Shri Narasimha is not saying ''he thinks'' -he says > he > > > > is ''confident'' and making theories.We are all in search of > the > > same > > > > light -but if one among our friends is not ready to listen - we > > have > > > > to help him.We will first try to convince him using soft > > words.If it > > > > is not working we have to be firm.I feel i am not wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > > > > > tatpadam darsita yena > > > > > > tasmai sri gurave namah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > > astrology/info.html > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Visit your group "vedic- > > astrology<vedic astrology>" > > > > on the web. > > > > > > > > - > > > > vedic astrology<vedic- astrology- > > ?subject=Un> > > > > > > > > - Terms > of > > > > Service <>. > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > > tatpadam darsita yena > > > tasmai sri gurave namaha > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Share Posted December 8, 2005 Jaya Jagannatha Dear Prabodh, Namaste There are several levels of activating the Shiva in us. Hatha Yoga is one such method. It seems you are stuck to one such thought. My 2 cents! Love, Swee vedic astrology [vedic astrology] On Behalf Of Prabodh Vekhande Thursday, December 08, 2005 4:49 PM vedic astrology [vedic astrology] Re: To Prabodhji: Why Kundalini Awakening impossible in women? Dear Jyotiji & All Namaste When I said that women will not have kundalini activation I did not mean to belittle them. I respect all women. All the people whom I met who had Kundalini activation have told me that women are not allowed into this. I never dared to ask why but I can guess. If anybody has a case of woman kundalini activation it would be interesting to read the expirences. Another point, I have not read /met any Hatyogi with a female diciple. If anybody knows such Hatyogi guru please let me know. I will be very much thankful. Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. Prabodh Vekhande Jai Jai Shankar Har Har Shankar vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi" <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote: > > Dear sir, > > Why do you say Kundalini activation is impossible in > women? Can you please explain the reason for that? > > > Regards, > Jyothi > > vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" > <amolmandar> wrote: > > > > Dear Vishnu and TV Rao Namste > > > > Activation of Chakras in female body is possible but no Kundalini > > activation. > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > > > Prabodh Vekhande > > Jai Jai Shankar > > har Har Shankar > > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > Dear Sri Rao garu, > > > > > > Yes, kundalini sakti is present in women too. > > > > > > warm regards, > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote: > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "r_tv_99" > > <tvrao_agd@s...> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > respected gurus and members, > > > > > > > > in this thread only male anatomy is discussed with respect to > > > > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me whether the > kundalini > > > > shakti is present in females or not? or it is only present in > > males? > > > > > > > > tvr > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear shri Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > Pls find my reply. > > > > > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep, > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pramana. > > > > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two fingers below the > > linga, > > > > four fingers > > > > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous root. > > > > > > > b)This area is known as perenium.Thanks to Ms.SweeChan > > ji.You > > > > may kindly > > > > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, space inbetween and > > also > > > > some > > > > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area! > > > > > > > > > > > > Please follow this link to get a better understanding > > > > > > > > > > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of getting lost in these technical terms, why don't > > we > > > > start with > > > > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black lines represent my > > view > > > > and the red > > > > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls send those pictures to my id vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > > > > Now pls see the following > > > > > > > > > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male- pelvic- > > > > organs.php > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm > > > > > > > > > > The part below navel called vasti contains the bladder and > > other > > > > pelvic organs and they are above the base of linga.They fall > > under > > > > Thula.Linga is below these organas. > > > > > > > > > > Combining these three pictures one can reach a sound > > understanding > > > > on where Mooladhara is. > > > > > Front part will relate to perenium(area from scrotum until > > anus) > > > > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only this can correspond to > > > > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 above Anus). > > > > > > > > > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics - Now how do you > > place > > > > this is in Libra? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a plane connecting anus > > and > > > > linga. > > > > > > > This plane is slanted to the vertical axis.Where is > > perenium.If > > > > perenium > > > > > > > is between anus and linga,how can you you place this in > > > > Libra,where Anus and > > > > > > > Linga are yet to start? > > > > > > > By reading all these together,it is not at all difficult > to > > > > understand how > > > > > > > mooladhara chakra ,hanging upside down,in the vicinity of > > > > perenium & scrotum > > > > > > > ,bordering thighs can be connected to Vrischika and Dhanu. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am unable to read your mind. Do me a favour and paint a > > picture > > > > of what > > > > > > you have in your mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandrahari did not conclude based on an assumption(as many > > astro > > > > > > > ''scholars'' are framing theories) -''oh moolam and > > mooldharam > > > > rhymes -let > > > > > > > me make a theory''. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Meaning,symbolism,astrological parallels,nakshathra and > > rashi > > > > > > > significations,& pramana defining mooladharam reinforced > by > > > > > > > researches lasting numerous years,resulted in such a > > conclusion. > > > > > > > But on the other hand Shri Narasimha is simply making a > > > > statement - ''for > > > > > > > me, i can confidently say Mooladharam of Kalapurusha is in > > > > Libra''.Most > > > > > > > interestingly he is confidently giving full list of > > chakras,at > > > > equidistant > > > > > > > intervals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whether chakras are equidistant or not only more research > and > > > > time will > > > > > > tell, it is a very fertile ground for research. On the other > > > > hand, you > > > > > > haven't provided any map whatsoever. I place the burden of > > proof > > > > on your > > > > > > head, provide a complete map of chakras and prove that > > chakras > > > > are at > > > > > > un-equal intervals! > > > > > > > > > > If i dont know about something -i have a simple answer.And > that > > > > is ''I don't Know''.I do not map all the chakras to various > > signs,in > > > > haste.Throat is Taurus(speech ,vocal cord should fall under 2nd > > > > house) -this is basic knoweldge,and how can one map this on to > > Gemini > > > > (hands,arms,shoulder -bahu) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards, > > > > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > PS: - If you have something against Sri.Narasimha, it is > > better > > > > you trash it > > > > > > out with him. It does you no good to deride and incur bad > > karma, > > > > with each > > > > > > and every post, does it? We are all in search of the same > > light, > > > > he has > > > > > > genuinely expressed his opinions and you did yours(w.r.t > > varga > > > > charts), end > > > > > > of story! > > > > > > > > > > Agreed.But you are not asking shri Narasimha to provide > > diagrams.I > > > > do not think this can incur bad karma.I have only good > > > > intentions.Shri Narasimha is not saying ''he thinks'' -he says > he > > > > is ''confident'' and making theories.We are all in search of > the > > same > > > > light -but if one among our friends is not ready to listen - we > > have > > > > to help him.We will first try to convince him using soft > > words.If it > > > > is not working we have to be firm.I feel i am not wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > > > > > tatpadam darsita yena > > > > > > tasmai sri gurave namah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > > astrology/info.html > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Visit your group "vedic- > > astrology<vedic astrology>" > > > > on the web. > > > > > > > > - > > > > vedic astrology<vedic- astrology- > > ?subject=Un> > > > > > > > > - Terms > of > > > > Service <>. > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > > tatpadam darsita yena > > > tasmai sri gurave namaha > > > > > > -- Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.12/194 - Release 12/7/2005 -- Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.12/194 - Release 12/7/2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Share Posted December 8, 2005 vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > <jvishnu@g...> wrote:> >> > || Hare Rama Krishna ||> > > > Dear Sri Rao garu,> > > > Yes, kundalini sakti is present in women too.> > > > warm regards,> > Vishnu> > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote:> > >> > > --- In vedic astrology, "r_tv_99" > <tvrao_agd@s...>> > > wrote:> > >> > > respected gurus and members,> > >> > > in this thread only male anatomy is discussed with respect to> > > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me whether the kundalini> > > shakti is present in females or not? or it is only present in > males?> > >> > > tvr> > >> > > --- In vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep"> > > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote:> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear shri Vishnu> > > >> > > > Pls find my reply.> > > >> > > > Pradeep> > > > --- In vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala> > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna ||> > > > >> > > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep,> > > > >> > > > > Namaste,> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Pramana.> > > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two fingers below the > linga,> > > four fingers> > > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous root.> > > > > > b)This area is known as perenium.Thanks to Ms.SweeChan > ji.You> > > may kindly> > > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all are.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, space inbetween and > also> > > some> > > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area!> > > > >> > > > > Please follow this link to get a better understanding> > > > >> > > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html> > > > >> > > > > Instead of getting lost in these technical terms, why don't > we> > > start with> > > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black lines represent my > view> > > and the red> > > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please correct.> > > > >> > > >> > > > Pls send those pictures to my id vijayadas_pradeep> > > >> > > > Now pls see the following> > > >> > > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male-pelvic-> > > organs.php> > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm> > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm> > > >> > > > The part below navel called vasti contains the bladder and > other> > > pelvic organs and they are above the base of linga.They fall > under> > > Thula.Linga is below these organas.> > > >> > > > Combining these three pictures one can reach a sound > understanding> > > on where Mooladhara is.> > > > Front part will relate to perenium(area from scrotum until > anus)> > > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only this can correspond to> > > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 above Anus).> > > >> > > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics - Now how do you > place> > > this is in Libra?> > > >> > > > >> > > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a plane connecting anus > and> > > linga.> > > > > > This plane is slanted to the vertical axis.Where is > perenium.If> > > perenium> > > > > > is between anus and linga,how can you you place this in> > > Libra,where Anus and> > > > > > Linga are yet to start?> > > > > > By reading all these together,it is not at all difficult to> > > understand how> > > > > > mooladhara chakra ,hanging upside down,in the vicinity of> > > perenium & scrotum> > > > > > ,bordering thighs can be connected to Vrischika and Dhanu.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > I am unable to read your mind. Do me a favour and paint a > picture> > > of what> > > > > you have in your mind.> > > > >> > > > > Chandrahari did not conclude based on an assumption(as many > astro> > > > > > ''scholars'' are framing theories) -''oh moolam and > mooldharam> > > rhymes -let> > > > > > me make a theory''.> > > > > >> > > > > > Meaning,symbolism,astrological parallels,nakshathra and > rashi> > > > > > significations,& pramana defining mooladharam reinforced by> > > > > > researches lasting numerous years,resulted in such a > conclusion.> > > > > > But on the other hand Shri Narasimha is simply making a> > > statement - ''for> > > > > > me, i can confidently say Mooladharam of Kalapurusha is in> > > Libra''.Most> > > > > > interestingly he is confidently giving full list of > chakras,at> > > equidistant> > > > > > intervals.> > > > > >> > > > > Whether chakras are equidistant or not only more research and> > > time will> > > > > tell, it is a very fertile ground for research. On the other> > > hand, you> > > > > haven't provided any map whatsoever. I place the burden of > proof> > > on your> > > > > head, provide a complete map of chakras and prove that > chakras> > > are at> > > > > un-equal intervals!> > > >> > > > If i dont know about something -i have a simple answer.And that> > > is ''I don't Know''.I do not map all the chakras to various > signs,in> > > haste.Throat is Taurus(speech ,vocal cord should fall under 2nd> > > house) -this is basic knoweldge,and how can one map this on to > Gemini> > > (hands,arms,shoulder -bahu)> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > warm regards,> > > > > Vishnu> > > > >> > > > > PS: - If you have something against Sri.Narasimha, it is > better> > > you trash it> > > > > out with him. It does you no good to deride and incur bad > karma,> > > with each> > > > > and every post, does it? We are all in search of the same > light,> > > he has> > > > > genuinely expressed his opinions and you did yours(w.r.t > varga> > > charts), end> > > > > of story!> > > >> > > > Agreed.But you are not asking shri Narasimha to provide > diagrams.I> > > do not think this can incur bad karma.I have only good> > > intentions.Shri Narasimha is not saying ''he thinks'' -he says he> > > is ''confident'' and making theories.We are all in search of the > same> > > light -but if one among our friends is not ready to listen - we > have> > > to help him.We will first try to convince him using soft > words.If it> > > is not working we have to be firm.I feel i am not wrong.> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > --> > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram> > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam> > > > > tatpadam darsita yena> > > > > tasmai sri gurave namah> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > --- End forwarded message ---> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Archives: vedic astrology> > >> > > Group info: vedic-> astrology/info.html> > >> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-> > > >> > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > >> > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu ||> > >> > >> > > ------------------------------> > > > > >> > >> > > - Visit your group "vedic-> astrology<vedic astrology>"> > > on the web.> > >> > > - > > > vedic astrology<vedic astrology-> ?subject=Un>> > >> > > - Your use of is subject to the Terms of> > > Service <>.> > >> > >> > > ------------------------------> > >> > > > > > > > --> > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram> > vyaptam yena charaa charam> > tatpadam darsita yena> > tasmai sri gurave namaha> >> ShoppingFind Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Shopping India Matrimony: Find your partner now. banner|**| --> Visit your group "vedic astrology" on the web. vedic astrology Your use of is subject to the Shopping Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Shopping Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Share Posted December 8, 2005 Dear Sir, It is understood that you didnt mean to belittle women. But I was thinking whether it was just your personal opinion (which I knew it is) or you had any scientific reason.I have read the experiences narrated by several women about their KA in the net. If my memory is correct, even in this group much earlier some body had written about that. (That was how I started reading of it with more curiosity). Since you said it so authentically, I thought you might have some reliable reason. If it is the problem of only "allowance' and not 'impossible' , then ok. Because personally I feel women are more capable of awakening Kundalini more quickly and less dangerously than men because of their inherent fine nature and strong mental faculties. (No controversy meant...plz). Also isnt Hatha yoga one among the sevaral methods to awaken Kundalini? Just because you havent met any Hatha yogi with female disciple does that mean women are not capable or permitted for KA? Those Hatha Yogis may be people scared of losing their mental control!! I dont find any other reason. If you know please share. If my understanding is correct Kundalini can awaken due to various reasons, without doing any yoga. Just intense faith in ones Goddess and above all the intense and genuine QUEST to know the truth will, I believe, lead one to such experiences. In this case it can be a spontaneous process. I hope I am right. "If anybody has a case of woman kundalini activation it would be interesting to read the expirences." Regarding this, I feel the experiences of KA with each person is unique. It doesnt have anything to do with gender. Like, all men will feel like this and all women will like that. Am I correct? If the net resources can be believed there are lot of articles by women explaining their Kundalini experience. I had read about it but dont remember the site names. If I come across again I will let you know. Thanks for your clarification. REgards, Jyothi. vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" <amolmandar> wrote: > > Dear Jyotiji & All Namaste > > When I said that women will not have kundalini activation I did not > mean to belittle them. I respect all women. All the people whom I > met who had Kundalini activation have told me that women are not > allowed into this. I never dared to ask why but I can guess. If > anybody has a case of woman kundalini activation it would be > interesting to read the expirences. Another point, I have not > read /met any Hatyogi with a female diciple. If anybody knows such > Hatyogi guru please let me know. I will be very much thankful. > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > Prabodh Vekhande > Jai Jai Shankar > Har Har Shankar > > > vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi" > <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote: > > > > Dear sir, > > > > Why do you say Kundalini activation is impossible in > > women? Can you please explain the reason for that? > > > > > > Regards, > > Jyothi > > > > vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" > > <amolmandar> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Vishnu and TV Rao Namste > > > > > > Activation of Chakras in female body is possible but no > Kundalini > > > activation. > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > > > > > Prabodh Vekhande > > > Jai Jai Shankar > > > har Har Shankar > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Rao garu, > > > > > > > > Yes, kundalini sakti is present in women too. > > > > > > > > warm regards, > > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "r_tv_99" > > > <tvrao_agd@s...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > respected gurus and members, > > > > > > > > > > in this thread only male anatomy is discussed with respect to > > > > > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me whether the > > kundalini > > > > > shakti is present in females or not? or it is only present > in > > > males? > > > > > > > > > > tvr > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear shri Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls find my reply. > > > > > > > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pramana. > > > > > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two fingers below the > > > linga, > > > > > four fingers > > > > > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous root. > > > > > > > > b)This area is known as perenium.Thanks to Ms.SweeChan > > > ji.You > > > > > may kindly > > > > > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, space inbetween > and > > > also > > > > > some > > > > > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please follow this link to get a better understanding > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of getting lost in these technical terms, why > don't > > > we > > > > > start with > > > > > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black lines represent > my > > > view > > > > > and the red > > > > > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls send those pictures to my id vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > Now pls see the following > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male- > pelvic- > > > > > organs.php > > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm > > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > The part below navel called vasti contains the bladder and > > > other > > > > > pelvic organs and they are above the base of linga.They fall > > > under > > > > > Thula.Linga is below these organas. > > > > > > > > > > > > Combining these three pictures one can reach a sound > > > understanding > > > > > on where Mooladhara is. > > > > > > Front part will relate to perenium(area from scrotum until > > > anus) > > > > > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only this can correspond > to > > > > > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 above Anus). > > > > > > > > > > > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics - Now how do you > > > place > > > > > this is in Libra? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a plane connecting > anus > > > and > > > > > linga. > > > > > > > > This plane is slanted to the vertical axis.Where is > > > perenium.If > > > > > perenium > > > > > > > > is between anus and linga,how can you you place this in > > > > > Libra,where Anus and > > > > > > > > Linga are yet to start? > > > > > > > > By reading all these together,it is not at all > difficult > > to > > > > > understand how > > > > > > > > mooladhara chakra ,hanging upside down,in the vicinity > of > > > > > perenium & scrotum > > > > > > > > ,bordering thighs can be connected to Vrischika and > Dhanu. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am unable to read your mind. Do me a favour and paint > a > > > picture > > > > > of what > > > > > > > you have in your mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandrahari did not conclude based on an assumption(as > many > > > astro > > > > > > > > ''scholars'' are framing theories) -''oh moolam and > > > mooldharam > > > > > rhymes -let > > > > > > > > me make a theory''. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Meaning,symbolism,astrological parallels,nakshathra > and > > > rashi > > > > > > > > significations,& pramana defining mooladharam > reinforced > > by > > > > > > > > researches lasting numerous years,resulted in such a > > > conclusion. > > > > > > > > But on the other hand Shri Narasimha is simply making a > > > > > statement - ''for > > > > > > > > me, i can confidently say Mooladharam of Kalapurusha > is in > > > > > Libra''.Most > > > > > > > > interestingly he is confidently giving full list of > > > chakras,at > > > > > equidistant > > > > > > > > intervals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whether chakras are equidistant or not only more > research > > and > > > > > time will > > > > > > > tell, it is a very fertile ground for research. On the > other > > > > > hand, you > > > > > > > haven't provided any map whatsoever. I place the burden > of > > > proof > > > > > on your > > > > > > > head, provide a complete map of chakras and prove that > > > chakras > > > > > are at > > > > > > > un-equal intervals! > > > > > > > > > > > > If i dont know about something -i have a simple answer.And > > that > > > > > is ''I don't Know''.I do not map all the chakras to various > > > signs,in > > > > > haste.Throat is Taurus(speech ,vocal cord should fall under > 2nd > > > > > house) -this is basic knoweldge,and how can one map this on > to > > > Gemini > > > > > (hands,arms,shoulder -bahu) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards, > > > > > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PS: - If you have something against Sri.Narasimha, it is > > > better > > > > > you trash it > > > > > > > out with him. It does you no good to deride and incur > bad > > > karma, > > > > > with each > > > > > > > and every post, does it? We are all in search of the > same > > > light, > > > > > he has > > > > > > > genuinely expressed his opinions and you did yours (w.r.t > > > varga > > > > > charts), end > > > > > > > of story! > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed.But you are not asking shri Narasimha to provide > > > diagrams.I > > > > > do not think this can incur bad karma.I have only good > > > > > intentions.Shri Narasimha is not saying ''he thinks'' -he > says > > he > > > > > is ''confident'' and making theories.We are all in search of > > the > > > same > > > > > light -but if one among our friends is not ready to listen - > we > > > have > > > > > to help him.We will first try to convince him using soft > > > words.If it > > > > > is not working we have to be firm.I feel i am not wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > > > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > > > > > > tatpadam darsita yena > > > > > > > tasmai sri gurave namah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > > > astrology/info.html > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Visit your group "vedic- > > > astrology<vedic astrology>" > > > > > on the web. > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > vedic astrology<vedic- > astrology- > > > ?subject=Un> > > > > > > > > > > - > Terms > > of > > > > > Service <>. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > > > tatpadam darsita yena > > > > tasmai sri gurave namaha > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2005 Report Share Posted December 8, 2005 Dear Jyoti ji Namaste My Kundalini is well sleeping at Muladhara! So whatever I will say about this will be based on what I saw and learned from my Gurus. There seems to be an opinion that Kundalini can be activated by many means like Bhakti,Upasana and other means as well. Many are there who conduct workshop to activate your Kundalini in a weeks time! So if it not clear what is KA we will keep on arguing endlessly. But as far as I know(and I am very sure about my source) to get real kundalini activation total command on Hatyoga is a must. Doing Hatayoga is a very difficult task for many in the world. Those who feel that kundalini can be activated without hatyoga,should think about why Udayyanbandha is advised before doing anything in this KA area. Anybody who knows this will not ask women to perform KA I am sure! There seems to be confusion about Chakra Activation and KA. CA can be done by mantra and tantra and that need not lead to KA. Most of the other path like reki,and Bhakti marga in one form or the other, get the results because of CA only. I think we should stop this thread as it is getting away from Jyotish. Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. Prabodh Vekhande Jai Jai Shankar Har Har Shankar vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi" <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote: > > Dear Sir, > > It is understood that you didnt mean to belittle women. But > I was thinking whether it was just your personal opinion (which I > knew it is) or you had any scientific reason.I have read the > experiences narrated by several women about their KA in the net. If > my memory is correct, even in this group much earlier some body had > written about that. (That was how I started reading of it with more > curiosity). > > Since you said it so authentically, I thought you might have some > reliable reason. If it is the problem of only "allowance' and > not 'impossible' , then ok. Because personally I feel women are more > capable of awakening Kundalini more quickly and less dangerously than > men because of their inherent fine nature and strong mental > faculties. (No controversy meant...plz). > > Also isnt Hatha yoga one among the sevaral methods to awaken > Kundalini? Just because you havent met any Hatha yogi with female > disciple does that mean women are not capable or permitted for KA? > Those Hatha Yogis may be people scared of losing their mental > control!! I dont find any other reason. If you know please share. If > my understanding is correct Kundalini can awaken due to various > reasons, without doing any yoga. Just intense faith in ones Goddess > and above all the intense and genuine QUEST to know the truth will, I > believe, lead one to such experiences. In this case it can be a > spontaneous process. I hope I am right. > > "If anybody has a case of woman kundalini activation it would be > interesting to read the expirences." > > Regarding this, I feel the experiences of KA with each person is > unique. It doesnt have anything to do with gender. Like, all men will > feel like this and all women will like that. Am I correct? > If the net resources can be believed there are lot of articles by > women explaining their Kundalini experience. I had read about it but > dont remember the site names. If I come across again I will let you > know. > > Thanks for your clarification. > > REgards, > Jyothi. > > vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" > <amolmandar> wrote: > > > > Dear Jyotiji & All Namaste > > > > When I said that women will not have kundalini activation I did not > > mean to belittle them. I respect all women. All the people whom I > > met who had Kundalini activation have told me that women are not > > allowed into this. I never dared to ask why but I can guess. If > > anybody has a case of woman kundalini activation it would be > > interesting to read the expirences. Another point, I have not > > read /met any Hatyogi with a female diciple. If anybody knows such > > Hatyogi guru please let me know. I will be very much thankful. > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > > > Prabodh Vekhande > > Jai Jai Shankar > > Har Har Shankar > > > > > > vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi" > > <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote: > > > > > > Dear sir, > > > > > > Why do you say Kundalini activation is impossible in > > > women? Can you please explain the reason for that? > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Jyothi > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" > > > <amolmandar> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Vishnu and TV Rao Namste > > > > > > > > Activation of Chakras in female body is possible but no > > Kundalini > > > > activation. > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > > > > > > > Prabodh Vekhande > > > > Jai Jai Shankar > > > > har Har Shankar > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Rao garu, > > > > > > > > > > Yes, kundalini sakti is present in women too. > > > > > > > > > > warm regards, > > > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "r_tv_99" > > > > <tvrao_agd@s...> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > respected gurus and members, > > > > > > > > > > > > in this thread only male anatomy is discussed with respect > to > > > > > > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me whether the > > > kundalini > > > > > > shakti is present in females or not? or it is only present > > in > > > > males? > > > > > > > > > > > > tvr > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic- astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" > > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear shri Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls find my reply. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > > > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pramana. > > > > > > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two fingers below > the > > > > linga, > > > > > > four fingers > > > > > > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous root. > > > > > > > > > b)This area is known as perenium.Thanks to > Ms.SweeChan > > > > ji.You > > > > > > may kindly > > > > > > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, space inbetween > > and > > > > also > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please follow this link to get a better understanding > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of getting lost in these technical terms, why > > don't > > > > we > > > > > > start with > > > > > > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black lines > represent > > my > > > > view > > > > > > and the red > > > > > > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls send those pictures to my id vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now pls see the following > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male- > > pelvic- > > > > > > organs.php > > > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm > > > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The part below navel called vasti contains the bladder > and > > > > other > > > > > > pelvic organs and they are above the base of linga.They > fall > > > > under > > > > > > Thula.Linga is below these organas. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Combining these three pictures one can reach a sound > > > > understanding > > > > > > on where Mooladhara is. > > > > > > > Front part will relate to perenium(area from scrotum > until > > > > anus) > > > > > > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only this can > correspond > > to > > > > > > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 above Anus). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics - Now how do > you > > > > place > > > > > > this is in Libra? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a plane connecting > > anus > > > > and > > > > > > linga. > > > > > > > > > This plane is slanted to the vertical axis.Where is > > > > perenium.If > > > > > > perenium > > > > > > > > > is between anus and linga,how can you you place this > in > > > > > > Libra,where Anus and > > > > > > > > > Linga are yet to start? > > > > > > > > > By reading all these together,it is not at all > > difficult > > > to > > > > > > understand how > > > > > > > > > mooladhara chakra ,hanging upside down,in the > vicinity > > of > > > > > > perenium & scrotum > > > > > > > > > ,bordering thighs can be connected to Vrischika and > > Dhanu. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am unable to read your mind. Do me a favour and paint > > a > > > > picture > > > > > > of what > > > > > > > > you have in your mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandrahari did not conclude based on an assumption (as > > many > > > > astro > > > > > > > > > ''scholars'' are framing theories) -''oh moolam and > > > > mooldharam > > > > > > rhymes -let > > > > > > > > > me make a theory''. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Meaning,symbolism,astrological parallels,nakshathra > > and > > > > rashi > > > > > > > > > significations,& pramana defining mooladharam > > reinforced > > > by > > > > > > > > > researches lasting numerous years,resulted in such a > > > > conclusion. > > > > > > > > > But on the other hand Shri Narasimha is simply making > a > > > > > > statement - ''for > > > > > > > > > me, i can confidently say Mooladharam of Kalapurusha > > is in > > > > > > Libra''.Most > > > > > > > > > interestingly he is confidently giving full list of > > > > chakras,at > > > > > > equidistant > > > > > > > > > intervals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whether chakras are equidistant or not only more > > research > > > and > > > > > > time will > > > > > > > > tell, it is a very fertile ground for research. On the > > other > > > > > > hand, you > > > > > > > > haven't provided any map whatsoever. I place the burden > > of > > > > proof > > > > > > on your > > > > > > > > head, provide a complete map of chakras and prove that > > > > chakras > > > > > > are at > > > > > > > > un-equal intervals! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If i dont know about something -i have a simple > answer.And > > > that > > > > > > is ''I don't Know''.I do not map all the chakras to various > > > > signs,in > > > > > > haste.Throat is Taurus(speech ,vocal cord should fall under > > 2nd > > > > > > house) -this is basic knoweldge,and how can one map this on > > to > > > > Gemini > > > > > > (hands,arms,shoulder -bahu) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards, > > > > > > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PS: - If you have something against Sri.Narasimha, it > is > > > > better > > > > > > you trash it > > > > > > > > out with him. It does you no good to deride and incur > > bad > > > > karma, > > > > > > with each > > > > > > > > and every post, does it? We are all in search of the > > same > > > > light, > > > > > > he has > > > > > > > > genuinely expressed his opinions and you did yours > (w.r.t > > > > varga > > > > > > charts), end > > > > > > > > of story! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed.But you are not asking shri Narasimha to provide > > > > diagrams.I > > > > > > do not think this can incur bad karma.I have only good > > > > > > intentions.Shri Narasimha is not saying ''he thinks'' -he > > says > > > he > > > > > > is ''confident'' and making theories.We are all in search > of > > > the > > > > same > > > > > > light -but if one among our friends is not ready to listen - > > > we > > > > have > > > > > > to help him.We will first try to convince him using soft > > > > words.If it > > > > > > is not working we have to be firm.I feel i am not wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > > > > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > > > > > > > tatpadam darsita yena > > > > > > > > tasmai sri gurave namah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > > > > astrology/info.html > > > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Visit your group "vedic- > > > > astrology<vedic astrology>" > > > > > > on the web. > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > vedic astrology<vedic- > > astrology- > > > > ?subject=Un> > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > Terms > > > of > > > > > > Service <>. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > > > > tatpadam darsita yena > > > > > tasmai sri gurave namaha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2005 Report Share Posted December 9, 2005 Dear Sir, Please avoid the suffix 'ji'. I didnt mean to argue. But you are the first source from which I heard that it is impossible for women to awaken Kundalini. I have been reading so many books on the subject and also from net, but nowhere I had come across the prohibition on women. So I was just curious to know the reason. Thats all. I am just a novice in this subject and trying to understand. May be as you said, the strict and difficult mudras and asanas are difficult for women, but I was thinking about the other ways. Anyways, let me research on whether it is true or false:-). Thanks and regards, Jyothi vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" <amolmandar> wrote: > > Dear Jyoti ji Namaste > > My Kundalini is well sleeping at Muladhara! So whatever I will say > about this will be based on what I saw and learned from my Gurus. > > There seems to be an opinion that Kundalini can be activated by many > means like Bhakti,Upasana and other means as well. Many are there who > conduct workshop to activate your Kundalini in a weeks time! So if it > not clear what is KA we will keep on arguing endlessly. > > But as far as I know(and I am very sure about my source) to get real > kundalini activation total command on Hatyoga is a must. Doing > Hatayoga is a very difficult task for many in the world. > Those who feel that kundalini can be activated without hatyoga,should > think about why Udayyanbandha is advised before doing anything in > this KA area. Anybody who knows this will not ask women to perform KA > I am sure! > > There seems to be confusion about Chakra Activation and KA. CA can be > done by mantra and tantra and that need not lead to KA. Most of the > other path like reki,and Bhakti marga in one form or the other, get > the results because of CA only. > > I think we should stop this thread as it is getting away from > Jyotish. > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space. > > Prabodh Vekhande > Jai Jai Shankar > Har Har Shankar > > > > vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi" > <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote: > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > It is understood that you didnt mean to belittle women. > But > > I was thinking whether it was just your personal opinion (which I > > knew it is) or you had any scientific reason.I have read the > > experiences narrated by several women about their KA in the net. If > > my memory is correct, even in this group much earlier some body had > > written about that. (That was how I started reading of it with more > > curiosity). > > > > Since you said it so authentically, I thought you might have > some > > reliable reason. If it is the problem of only "allowance' and > > not 'impossible' , then ok. Because personally I feel women are > more > > capable of awakening Kundalini more quickly and less dangerously > than > > men because of their inherent fine nature and strong mental > > faculties. (No controversy meant...plz). > > > > Also isnt Hatha yoga one among the sevaral methods to awaken > > Kundalini? Just because you havent met any Hatha yogi with female > > disciple does that mean women are not capable or permitted for KA? > > Those Hatha Yogis may be people scared of losing their mental > > control!! I dont find any other reason. If you know please share. > If > > my understanding is correct Kundalini can awaken due to various > > reasons, without doing any yoga. Just intense faith in ones Goddess > > and above all the intense and genuine QUEST to know the truth will, > I > > believe, lead one to such experiences. In this case it can be a > > spontaneous process. I hope I am right. > > > > "If anybody has a case of woman kundalini activation it would > be > > interesting to read the expirences." > > > > Regarding this, I feel the experiences of KA with each person > is > > unique. It doesnt have anything to do with gender. Like, all men > will > > feel like this and all women will like that. Am I correct? > > If the net resources can be believed there are lot of articles > by > > women explaining their Kundalini experience. I had read about it > but > > dont remember the site names. If I come across again I will let you > > know. > > > > Thanks for your clarification. > > > > REgards, > > Jyothi. > > > > vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" > > <amolmandar> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Jyotiji & All Namaste > > > > > > When I said that women will not have kundalini activation I did > not > > > mean to belittle them. I respect all women. All the people whom I > > > met who had Kundalini activation have told me that women are not > > > allowed into this. I never dared to ask why but I can guess. If > > > anybody has a case of woman kundalini activation it would be > > > interesting to read the expirences. Another point, I have not > > > read /met any Hatyogi with a female diciple. If anybody knows > such > > > Hatyogi guru please let me know. I will be very much thankful. > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > > > > > Prabodh Vekhande > > > Jai Jai Shankar > > > Har Har Shankar > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi" > > > <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear sir, > > > > > > > > Why do you say Kundalini activation is impossible > in > > > > women? Can you please explain the reason for that? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Jyothi > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "Prabodh Vekhande" > > > > <amolmandar> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vishnu and TV Rao Namste > > > > > > > > > > Activation of Chakras in female body is possible but no > > > Kundalini > > > > > activation. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > > > > > > > > > Prabodh Vekhande > > > > > Jai Jai Shankar > > > > > har Har Shankar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Rao garu, > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, kundalini sakti is present in women too. > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards, > > > > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, "r_tv_99" > > > > > <tvrao_agd@s...> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > respected gurus and members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in this thread only male anatomy is discussed with > respect > > to > > > > > > > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me whether the > > > > kundalini > > > > > > > shakti is present in females or not? or it is only > present > > > in > > > > > males? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tvr > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic- > astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" > > > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear shri Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls find my reply. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala > > > > > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pramana. > > > > > > > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two fingers below > > the > > > > > linga, > > > > > > > four fingers > > > > > > > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous root. > > > > > > > > > > b)This area is known as perenium.Thanks to > > Ms.SweeChan > > > > > ji.You > > > > > > > may kindly > > > > > > > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, space > inbetween > > > and > > > > > also > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please follow this link to get a better understanding > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of getting lost in these technical terms, why > > > don't > > > > > we > > > > > > > start with > > > > > > > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black lines > > represent > > > my > > > > > view > > > > > > > and the red > > > > > > > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls send those pictures to my id vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now pls see the following > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male- > > > pelvic- > > > > > > > organs.php > > > > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm > > > > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The part below navel called vasti contains the bladder > > and > > > > > other > > > > > > > pelvic organs and they are above the base of linga.They > > fall > > > > > under > > > > > > > Thula.Linga is below these organas. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Combining these three pictures one can reach a sound > > > > > understanding > > > > > > > on where Mooladhara is. > > > > > > > > Front part will relate to perenium(area from scrotum > > until > > > > > anus) > > > > > > > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only this can > > correspond > > > to > > > > > > > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 above Anus). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics - Now how do > > you > > > > > place > > > > > > > this is in Libra? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a plane connecting > > > anus > > > > > and > > > > > > > linga. > > > > > > > > > > This plane is slanted to the vertical axis.Where is > > > > > perenium.If > > > > > > > perenium > > > > > > > > > > is between anus and linga,how can you you place > this > > in > > > > > > > Libra,where Anus and > > > > > > > > > > Linga are yet to start? > > > > > > > > > > By reading all these together,it is not at all > > > difficult > > > > to > > > > > > > understand how > > > > > > > > > > mooladhara chakra ,hanging upside down,in the > > vicinity > > > of > > > > > > > perenium & scrotum > > > > > > > > > > ,bordering thighs can be connected to Vrischika and > > > Dhanu. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am unable to read your mind. Do me a favour and > paint > > > a > > > > > picture > > > > > > > of what > > > > > > > > > you have in your mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chandrahari did not conclude based on an assumption > (as > > > many > > > > > astro > > > > > > > > > > ''scholars'' are framing theories) -''oh moolam and > > > > > mooldharam > > > > > > > rhymes -let > > > > > > > > > > me make a theory''. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Meaning,symbolism,astrological parallels,nakshathra > > > and > > > > > rashi > > > > > > > > > > significations,& pramana defining mooladharam > > > reinforced > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > researches lasting numerous years,resulted in such > a > > > > > conclusion. > > > > > > > > > > But on the other hand Shri Narasimha is simply > making > > a > > > > > > > statement - ''for > > > > > > > > > > me, i can confidently say Mooladharam of > Kalapurusha > > > is in > > > > > > > Libra''.Most > > > > > > > > > > interestingly he is confidently giving full list of > > > > > chakras,at > > > > > > > equidistant > > > > > > > > > > intervals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whether chakras are equidistant or not only more > > > research > > > > and > > > > > > > time will > > > > > > > > > tell, it is a very fertile ground for research. On > the > > > other > > > > > > > hand, you > > > > > > > > > haven't provided any map whatsoever. I place the > burden > > > of > > > > > proof > > > > > > > on your > > > > > > > > > head, provide a complete map of chakras and prove > that > > > > > chakras > > > > > > > are at > > > > > > > > > un-equal intervals! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If i dont know about something -i have a simple > > answer.And > > > > that > > > > > > > is ''I don't Know''.I do not map all the chakras to > various > > > > > signs,in > > > > > > > haste.Throat is Taurus(speech ,vocal cord should fall > under > > > 2nd > > > > > > > house) -this is basic knoweldge,and how can one map this > on > > > to > > > > > Gemini > > > > > > > (hands,arms,shoulder -bahu) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > warm regards, > > > > > > > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PS: - If you have something against Sri.Narasimha, it > > is > > > > > better > > > > > > > you trash it > > > > > > > > > out with him. It does you no good to deride and incur > > > bad > > > > > karma, > > > > > > > with each > > > > > > > > > and every post, does it? We are all in search of the > > > same > > > > > light, > > > > > > > he has > > > > > > > > > genuinely expressed his opinions and you did yours > > (w.r.t > > > > > varga > > > > > > > charts), end > > > > > > > > > of story! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed.But you are not asking shri Narasimha to provide > > > > > diagrams.I > > > > > > > do not think this can incur bad karma.I have only good > > > > > > > intentions.Shri Narasimha is not saying ''he thinks'' - he > > > says > > > > he > > > > > > > is ''confident'' and making theories.We are all in search > > of > > > > the > > > > > same > > > > > > > light -but if one among our friends is not ready to > listen - > > > > > we > > > > > have > > > > > > > to help him.We will first try to convince him using soft > > > > > words.If it > > > > > > > is not working we have to be firm.I feel i am not wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > > > > > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > > > > > > > > tatpadam darsita yena > > > > > > > > > tasmai sri gurave namah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- End forwarded message --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group info: vedic- > > > > > astrology/info.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Visit your group "vedic- > > > > > astrology<vedic astrology>" > > > > > > > on the web. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > vedic astrology<vedic- > > > astrology- > > > > > ?subject=Un> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Your use of is subject to the > > > Terms > > > > of > > > > > > > Service <>. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram > > > > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam > > > > > > tatpadam darsita yena > > > > > > tasmai sri gurave namaha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2005 Report Share Posted December 10, 2005 OM GAM! Dear Prabodhji, It is quite incorrect to say that that women will not have Kundalini activation. I do not know where you got this. I knew a lady who had this (Kundalini Awakening), she initiated me into Raja Yoga. She was a follower of Adwaita of Shankara. Kundali awakening is not exclusive to Hatha Yoga. As you asked, I am letting you know: Baba Hari Dass has done Hatha Yoga and has taught this to many women, as a part of Astanga Yoga. Many Yogis do Hatha Yoga, but not exclusively, they do it in addition to other yogas, such as Raja, Karma etc. If you want to know more visit "WWW.Humanfellowship.org". Regards, Gautam Sarkar --- Prabodh Vekhande <amolmandar wrote: > Dear Jyotiji & All Namaste > > When I said that women will not have kundalini > activation I did not > mean to belittle them. I respect all women. All the > people whom I > met who had Kundalini activation have told me that > women are not > allowed into this. I never dared to ask why but I > can guess. If > anybody has a case of woman kundalini activation it > would be > interesting to read the expirences. Another point, I > have not > read /met any Hatyogi with a female diciple. If > anybody knows such > Hatyogi guru please let me know. I will be very much > thankful. > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > Prabodh Vekhande > Jai Jai Shankar > Har Har Shankar > > > vedic astrology, > "jyothi_b_lakshmi" > <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote: > > > > Dear sir, > > > > Why do you say Kundalini activation is > impossible in > > women? Can you please explain the reason for that? > > > > > > Regards, > > Jyothi > > > > vedic astrology, "Prabodh > Vekhande" > > <amolmandar> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Vishnu and TV Rao Namste > > > > > > Activation of Chakras in female body is possible > but no > Kundalini > > > activation. > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce. > > > > > > Prabodh Vekhande > > > Jai Jai Shankar > > > har Har Shankar > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Vishnu > Jandhyala > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Rao garu, > > > > > > > > Yes, kundalini sakti is present in women too. > > > > > > > > warm regards, > > > > Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, > "r_tv_99" > > > <tvrao_agd@s...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > respected gurus and members, > > > > > > > > > > in this thread only male anatomy is > discussed with respect to > > > > > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me > whether the > > kundalini > > > > > shakti is present in females or not? or it > is only present > in > > > males? > > > > > > > > > > tvr > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, > "vijayadas_pradeep" > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear shri Vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls find my reply. > > > > > > > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > vedic astrology, > Vishnu Jandhyala > > > > > <jvishnu@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pramana. > > > > > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two > fingers below the > > > linga, > > > > > four fingers > > > > > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous > root. > > > > > > > > b)This area is known as > perenium.Thanks to Ms.SweeChan > > > ji.You > > > > > may kindly > > > > > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all > are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, > space inbetween > and > > > also > > > > > some > > > > > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please follow this link to get a better > understanding > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of getting lost in these > technical terms, why > don't > > > we > > > > > start with > > > > > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black > lines represent > my > > > view > > > > > and the red > > > > > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please > correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls send those pictures to my id > vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > Now pls see the following > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male- > pelvic- > > > > > organs.php > > > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm > > > > > > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > The part below navel called vasti contains > the bladder and > > > other > > > > > pelvic organs and they are above the base of > linga.They fall > > > under > > > > > Thula.Linga is below these organas. > > > > > > > > > > > > Combining these three pictures one can > reach a sound > > > understanding > > > > > on where Mooladhara is. > > > > > > Front part will relate to perenium(area > from scrotum until > > > anus) > > > > > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only > this can correspond > to > > > > > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 > above Anus). > > > > > > > > > > > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics > - Now how do you > > > place > > > > > this is in Libra? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a > plane connecting > anus > === message truncated === Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.