Three Lingas of Subtle Body (Body parts and houses)

[Guest guest]

Dear Vishnu and TV Rao Namste

 

Activation of Chakras in female body is possible but no Kundalini

activation.

 

Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.

 

Prabodh Vekhande

Jai Jai Shankar

har Har Shankar

 

 

vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala

<jvishnu@g...> wrote:

>

> || Hare Rama Krishna ||

>

> Dear Sri Rao garu,

>

> Yes, kundalini sakti is present in women too.

>

> warm regards,

> Vishnu

>

>

>

> On 12/6/05, r_tv_99 <tvrao_agd@s...> wrote:

> >

> > vedic astrology, "r_tv_99"

<tvrao_agd@s...>

> > wrote:

> >

> > respected gurus and members,

> >

> > in this thread only male anatomy is discussed with respect to

> > kundalini. as a laymen, please enlighten me whether the kundalini

> > shakti is present in females or not? or it is only present in

males?

> >

> > tvr

> >

> > vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep"

> > <vijayadas_pradeep> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear shri Vishnu

> > >

> > > Pls find my reply.

> > >

> > > Pradeep

> > > vedic astrology, Vishnu Jandhyala

> > <jvishnu@g...> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > || Hare Rama Krishna ||

> > > >

> > > > Dear Sri. Pradeep,

> > > >

> > > > Namaste,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Pramana.

> > > > > a)Two fingers above the anus and two fingers below the

linga,

> > four fingers

> > > > > in width, is a space like a bulbous root.

> > > > > b)This area is known as perenium.Thanks to Ms.SweeChan

ji.You

> > may kindly

> > > > > check where Perenium,Scrotum and all are.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > Perineum?? Perineum is the linga, guda, space inbetween and

also

> > some

> > > > portions of buttocks! It is a wide area!

> > > >

> > > > Please follow this link to get a better understanding

> > > >

> > > > http://anatomy.uams.edu/anatomyhtml/marvinpelvis.html

> > > >

> > > > Instead of getting lost in these technical terms, why don't

we

> > start with

> > > > pictures? I am attaching an image. Black lines represent my

view

> > and the red

> > > > lines are yours. If wrong , please correct.

> > > >

> > >

> > > Pls send those pictures to my id vijayadas_pradeep

> > >

> > > Now pls see the following

> > >

> > > http://www.continence-foundation.org.uk/in-depth/male-pelvic-

> > organs.php

> > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/externalgenital.htm

> > > http://classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg835/pubococcmuscle.htm

> > >

> > > The part below navel called vasti contains the bladder and

other

> > pelvic organs and they are above the base of linga.They fall

under

> > Thula.Linga is below these organas.

> > >

> > > Combining these three pictures one can reach a sound

understanding

> > on where Mooladhara is.

> > > Front part will relate to perenium(area from scrotum until

anus)

> > and and rear will fall below coccyx(Only this can correspond to

> > classical def:2 angulas below linga and 2 above Anus).

> > >

> > > Mooladhara is below linga as per classics - Now how do you

place

> > this is in Libra?

> > >

> > > >

> > > > To locate Perenium,one has to find a plane connecting anus

and

> > linga.

> > > > > This plane is slanted to the vertical axis.Where is

perenium.If

> > perenium

> > > > > is between anus and linga,how can you you place this in

> > Libra,where Anus and

> > > > > Linga are yet to start?

> > > > > By reading all these together,it is not at all difficult to

> > understand how

> > > > > mooladhara chakra ,hanging upside down,in the vicinity of

> > perenium & scrotum

> > > > > ,bordering thighs can be connected to Vrischika and Dhanu.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > I am unable to read your mind. Do me a favour and paint a

picture

> > of what

> > > > you have in your mind.

> > > >

> > > > Chandrahari did not conclude based on an assumption(as many

astro

> > > > > ''scholars'' are framing theories) -''oh moolam and

mooldharam

> > rhymes -let

> > > > > me make a theory''.

> > > > >

> > > > > Meaning,symbolism,astrological parallels,nakshathra and

rashi

> > > > > significations,& pramana defining mooladharam reinforced by

> > > > > researches lasting numerous years,resulted in such a

conclusion.

> > > > > But on the other hand Shri Narasimha is simply making a

> > statement - ''for

> > > > > me, i can confidently say Mooladharam of Kalapurusha is in

> > Libra''.Most

> > > > > interestingly he is confidently giving full list of

chakras,at

> > equidistant

> > > > > intervals.

> > > > >

> > > > Whether chakras are equidistant or not only more research and

> > time will

> > > > tell, it is a very fertile ground for research. On the other

> > hand, you

> > > > haven't provided any map whatsoever. I place the burden of

proof

> > on your

> > > > head, provide a complete map of chakras and prove that

chakras

> > are at

> > > > un-equal intervals!

> > >

> > > If i dont know about something -i have a simple answer.And that

> > is ''I don't Know''.I do not map all the chakras to various

signs,in

> > haste.Throat is Taurus(speech ,vocal cord should fall under 2nd

> > house) -this is basic knoweldge,and how can one map this on to

Gemini

> > (hands,arms,shoulder -bahu)

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > warm regards,

> > > > Vishnu

> > > >

> > > > PS: - If you have something against Sri.Narasimha, it is

better

> > you trash it

> > > > out with him. It does you no good to deride and incur bad

karma,

> > with each

> > > > and every post, does it? We are all in search of the same

light,

> > he has

> > > > genuinely expressed his opinions and you did yours(w.r.t

varga

> > charts), end

> > > > of story!

> > >

> > > Agreed.But you are not asking shri Narasimha to provide

diagrams.I

> > do not think this can incur bad karma.I have only good

> > intentions.Shri Narasimha is not saying ''he thinks'' -he says he

> > is ''confident'' and making theories.We are all in search of the

same

> > light -but if one among our friends is not ready to listen - we

have

> > to help him.We will first try to convince him using soft

words.If it

> > is not working we have to be firm.I feel i am not wrong.

> > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > --

> > > > Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram

> > > > vyaptam yena charaa charam

> > > > tatpadam darsita yena

> > > > tasmai sri gurave namah

> > > >

> > >

> >

> > --- End forwarded message ---

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Group info: vedic-

astrology/info.html

> >

> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ------------------------------

> >

> >

> >

> > - Visit your group "vedic-

astrology<vedic astrology>"

> > on the web.

> >

> > -

> > vedic astrology<vedic astrology-

?subject=Un>

> >

> > - Terms of

> > Service <>.

> >

> >

> > ------------------------------

> >

>

>

>

> --

> Om Akhanda mandalaakaaram

> vyaptam yena charaa charam

> tatpadam darsita yena

> tasmai sri gurave namaha

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Shri Vishnu

 

Is this Akula and its positioning part of ''Oral Tradition'' or was copied from

some internet site.I am 100% sure that it cannot be part of any oral tradition

as they will not speak of such blunders.

 

Akula is the one that is not Kula and is Shiva and is not there, where you have

mentioned.The mappings are totally wrong.

 

I leave it with you to find out and correct.Pls read authentic more on akula and

you will find akula on top.I will write in detail -regarding the Manas and

Pancha Bhutas forming the six or main shadchakras.Sahasrara is above human

body(Kailasam) and is not within human body.

 

Rest of your mail will also be replied ind etail.

 

Pradeep

[Guest guest]

Dear Sri Pradeep,

Namaste,

Is this Akula and its positioning part of ''Oral Tradition'' or was

copied from some internet site.I am 100% sure that it cannot be part of

any oral tradition as they will not speak of such blunders.

No, positioning in the physical(gross) body is not part of oral tradition. 7

points listed are the ONLY oral tradition.

My argument that Akula is in/at Perinuem and Mooladhaara is

"Coccygeal plexus/ Coccyx" in the gross body is my understanding

Copied? I have no such need to copy things of some internet site and tag them

"oral tradition".

100% sure ? Good for you, read below.

Akula is the one that is not Kula and is Shiva and is not there, where you have mentioned.

I can't makeout what you are trying to say

Who is Akula?

Who is Kula?

The mappings are totally wrong.You are welcome to brand to each and everything as

"totally wrong".

I leave it with you to find out and correct.Pls read authentic more on

akula and you will find akula on top.

Thank you for the unsolicited advise.

"Akula is on top" is YOUR understanding/ reading of internet sites, in my

traditon Akula is at the bottom, end of story.

akule vishusaMGYe ca saakte vahnau tatha punaH

naa bhaavanaahaate suddhe laMbikaagre bhruvontare

Above verse is very close to my tradition and explicitly states there

are atleast 2 chakras below Mooladhaara and AKULA IS BELOW MOOLADHARA.

Think twice before dismissing other traditions and being 100% sure!

Show me a verse which explicitly states there are "no chakras below mooladhaara"

and "Akula is on top of head"!

I will write in detail -regarding

the Manas and Pancha Bhutas forming the six or main

shadchakras.Sahasrara is above human body(Kailasam) and is not within

human body.

Rest of your mail will also be replied ind etail.

Ok, will wait.

warm regards,

Vishnu

 

-- Om Akhanda mandalaakaaramvyaptam yena charaa charamtatpadam darsita yena tasmai sri gurave namah