Guest guest Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 Same as the above said Kula/Akuala !!!.You have some special Pramanas.This can explain your debating style. When confronted with a pramana, you offer no argument whatsoever other than flashy statements/words like "TOTALLY WRONG UNDERSTANDING OF SRI CHAKRA", "BLUNDERS". When pointedly asked to explain, all one could see was "SILENCE". I am sorry I couldn't match your style of "IGNORE", "SILENCE", "REFUGE IN PHILOSOPHY" and "JUMPING AROUND" from sacrum to coccyx to perineum! You were the one asking "pramana, pramana, pramana" and that is EXACTLY what you got! I had asked you to quote your pramana for "Akula at top" and there was nothing but a whole page of long winding philosophy. You can't provide a pramana. You have no idea where spinal axis ends, yet you have the temerity to write "go ask any anatomy lecturer". You have no idea whatsoever how other chakras are palced. blame my debating style? brand them as special pramana? Ignoring pramana and indulging in "MOOLADHAARA IN MOOLA" slogan, proves nothing! Any ways ,thanks for your valuable time.I do not think we are going to reach any conclusion with the ongoing style. You are absolutely right, we cannot reach a conclusion when you abdicate your avowed position "pramana based debate" and seek refuge in philosphy. Don't enter a debate if you cannot withstand pramanas you have never laid eyes on! warm regards,Vishnu -- Om Akhanda mandalaakaaramvyaptam yena charaa charamtatpadam darsita yena tasmai sri gurave namah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.