Guest guest Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 Dear Sir, Are you sure that is the reason? Well, that seems very odd to me. Because, if a headless can elevate a person to spiritual heights (Isnt Ketu considered Moksha karaka and planet that gives intution??) then why cant it take charge of a person? If Ketu can play a significant part in taking charge of a person's soul, why it is exempted from being any karaka? Regards, jyothi vedic astrology, Jyotish Learner <vedicastro_mind> wrote: > > How can Headless be a incahrge person when he cant see , got it Jyothi Mam, Ketu is headless so the case. > > > Plz rectify me if i am wrong. > > Regards, > > > jyothi_b_lakshmi <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote: > Respected Sirs, > > > I would like to know if Ketu will not be considered as > AK/AmK/PK/BK etc. and if not why. When I checked JHora, all the sample > horoscopes, (and whenever one enters any new data), Ketu does not > become any Karaka even if it is having an advanced longitude. Only Rahu > is being considered in the series of karakas depending upon the degree. > Is there any reason for this? > > Learned members please help to clear the doubt. > > > Regards, > Jyothi > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "vedic astrology" on the web. > > > vedic astrology > > Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.