Guest guest Posted December 19, 2005 Report Share Posted December 19, 2005 Dear Sir, Just a thought. Sukra is one eyed (still considered as significant (karaka?) for eyes, and Sani is lame. But these deficiencies are not taken into account when they are treated as Karakas for AK, Amk, etc. If we start thinking of such reasons, then many planets according to myth, even Guru is not eligible to be a Guru. So I think there may be some other reason. I hope scholars will help. Regards, Jyothi vedic astrology, Jyotish Learner <vedicastro_mind> wrote: > > How can Headless be a incahrge person when he cant see , got it Jyothi Mam, Ketu is headless so the case. > > > Plz rectify me if i am wrong. > > Regards, > > > jyothi_b_lakshmi <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote: > Respected Sirs, > > > I would like to know if Ketu will not be considered as > AK/AmK/PK/BK etc. and if not why. When I checked JHora, all the sample > horoscopes, (and whenever one enters any new data), Ketu does not > become any Karaka even if it is having an advanced longitude. Only Rahu > is being considered in the series of karakas depending upon the degree. > Is there any reason for this? > > Learned members please help to clear the doubt. > > > Regards, > Jyothi > > > > > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "vedic astrology" on the web. > > > vedic astrology > > Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.