Why Ketu not considered as AK,,AmK, PK etc ??(Jyothi, et al)

[Guest guest]

||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

 

Dear Jyothi Ji and List Members, Namaskaar.

 

Allow me to share some of my understanding.

 

Firstly, there are three types of significators (karakas) considered

in Jyotish:

 

1) Naisargik (natural) karakas

2) Sthira (fixed) karakas

3) Chara (temporal) karakas

 

When considering the eight chara karaka scheme, we are considering

something temporal based on degrees.

[Paräsara: BPHS 34.13-15]

 

What are the lessons of the Jivaatman before reaching the Parmatman?

 

Since Ketu is Mokshakaraka, it is excluded from the Chara Karaka scheme.

 

I hope this helps.

 

Best wishes,

Nitin.

 

|| Namah Shivaaya ||

 

 

 

 

 

> > jyothi_b_lakshmi <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

> > Respected Sirs,

> >

> >

> > I would like to know if Ketu will not be considered as

> > AK/AmK/PK/BK etc. and if not why. When I checked JHora, all the

> sample

> > horoscopes, (and whenever one enters any new data), Ketu does not

> > become any Karaka even if it is having an advanced longitude. Only

> Rahu

> > is being considered in the series of karakas depending upon the

> degree.

> > Is there any reason for this?

> >

> > Learned members please help to clear the doubt.

> >

> >

> > Regards,

> > Jyothi

[Guest guest]

Dear Nitin,

 

 

Can you please explain furthur? The reason that ketu is

moksha karaka doesnt seem to me like a satisfactory one. If Ketu can

be included in the list of Naisargik/fixed karakas why not Temporal

karakas?

By temporary is it meant the temporary aspects of a being or is it

because of position of planets at ones brith time?

 

 

Regards,

jyothi

 

vedic astrology, "Nitin" <astronitin>

wrote:

>

> ||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

>

> Dear Jyothi Ji and List Members, Namaskaar.

>

> Allow me to share some of my understanding.

>

> Firstly, there are three types of significators (karakas) considered

> in Jyotish:

>

> 1) Naisargik (natural) karakas

> 2) Sthira (fixed) karakas

> 3) Chara (temporal) karakas

>

> When considering the eight chara karaka scheme, we are considering

> something temporal based on degrees.

> [Paräsara: BPHS 34.13-15]

>

> What are the lessons of the Jivaatman before reaching the

Parmatman?

>

> Since Ketu is Mokshakaraka, it is excluded from the Chara Karaka

scheme.

>

> I hope this helps.

>

> Best wishes,

> Nitin.

>

> || Namah Shivaaya ||

>

>

>

>

>

> > > jyothi_b_lakshmi <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

> > > Respected Sirs,

> > >

> > >

> > > I would like to know if Ketu will not be considered

as

> > > AK/AmK/PK/BK etc. and if not why. When I checked JHora, all the

> > sample

> > > horoscopes, (and whenever one enters any new data), Ketu does

not

> > > become any Karaka even if it is having an advanced longitude.

Only

> > Rahu

> > > is being considered in the series of karakas depending upon the

> > degree.

> > > Is there any reason for this?

> > >

> > > Learned members please help to clear the doubt.

> > >

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Jyothi

>

[Guest guest]

||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

 

Jyotish Ji and List Members, Namaskaar.

 

Allow me to share som eof my understanding...

 

As Chara karakas, there are lessons for the Jivatman to overcome or

experience before merging with the parmatman.

 

If you are liberated, you are not Jivatman...

 

Nitin.

P.S. Did you look at the reference given in BPHS?

 

|| Namah Shivaaya ||

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi"

<jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

>

> Dear Nitin,

>

>

> Can you please explain furthur? The reason that ketu is

> moksha karaka doesnt seem to me like a satisfactory one. If Ketu can

> be included in the list of Naisargik/fixed karakas why not Temporal

> karakas?

> By temporary is it meant the temporary aspects of a being or is it

> because of position of planets at ones brith time?

>

>

> Regards,

> jyothi

>

> vedic astrology, "Nitin" <astronitin>

> wrote:

> >

> > ||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

> >

> > Dear Jyothi Ji and List Members, Namaskaar.

> >

> > Allow me to share some of my understanding.

> >

> > Firstly, there are three types of significators (karakas) considered

> > in Jyotish:

> >

> > 1) Naisargik (natural) karakas

> > 2) Sthira (fixed) karakas

> > 3) Chara (temporal) karakas

> >

> > When considering the eight chara karaka scheme, we are considering

> > something temporal based on degrees.

> > [Paräsara: BPHS 34.13-15]

> >

> > What are the lessons of the Jivaatman before reaching the

> Parmatman?

> >

> > Since Ketu is Mokshakaraka, it is excluded from the Chara Karaka

> scheme.

> >

> > I hope this helps.

> >

> > Best wishes,

> > Nitin.

> >

> > || Namah Shivaaya ||

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > > > jyothi_b_lakshmi <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

> > > > Respected Sirs,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I would like to know if Ketu will not be considered

> as

> > > > AK/AmK/PK/BK etc. and if not why. When I checked JHora, all the

> > > sample

> > > > horoscopes, (and whenever one enters any new data), Ketu does

> not

> > > > become any Karaka even if it is having an advanced longitude.

> Only

> > > Rahu

> > > > is being considered in the series of karakas depending upon the

> > > degree.

> > > > Is there any reason for this?

> > > >

> > > > Learned members please help to clear the doubt.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > > Jyothi

[Guest guest]

Dear nitin,

 

Pls tell where I can find the reference (BPHS). Is there any

online reference?

 

Regards,

Jyothi

 

vedic astrology, "Nitin" <astronitin>

wrote:

>

> ||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

>

> Jyotish Ji and List Members, Namaskaar.

>

> Allow me to share som eof my understanding...

>

> As Chara karakas, there are lessons for the Jivatman to overcome or

> experience before merging with the parmatman.

>

> If you are liberated, you are not Jivatman...

>

> Nitin.

> P.S. Did you look at the reference given in BPHS?

>

> || Namah Shivaaya ||

>

>

>

>

> vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi"

> <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Nitin,

> >

> >

> > Can you please explain furthur? The reason that ketu is

> > moksha karaka doesnt seem to me like a satisfactory one. If Ketu

can

> > be included in the list of Naisargik/fixed karakas why not

Temporal

> > karakas?

> > By temporary is it meant the temporary aspects of a being or is

it

> > because of position of planets at ones brith time?

> >

> >

> > Regards,

> > jyothi

> >

> > vedic astrology, "Nitin" <astronitin>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > ||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

> > >

> > > Dear Jyothi Ji and List Members, Namaskaar.

> > >

> > > Allow me to share some of my understanding.

> > >

> > > Firstly, there are three types of significators (karakas)

considered

> > > in Jyotish:

> > >

> > > 1) Naisargik (natural) karakas

> > > 2) Sthira (fixed) karakas

> > > 3) Chara (temporal) karakas

> > >

> > > When considering the eight chara karaka scheme, we are

considering

> > > something temporal based on degrees.

> > > [Paräsara: BPHS 34.13-15]

> > >

> > > What are the lessons of the Jivaatman before reaching the

> > Parmatman?

> > >

> > > Since Ketu is Mokshakaraka, it is excluded from the Chara

Karaka

> > scheme.

> > >

> > > I hope this helps.

> > >

> > > Best wishes,

> > > Nitin.

> > >

> > > || Namah Shivaaya ||

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > > > jyothi_b_lakshmi <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

> > > > > Respected Sirs,

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > I would like to know if Ketu will not be

considered

> > as

> > > > > AK/AmK/PK/BK etc. and if not why. When I checked JHora, all

the

> > > > sample

> > > > > horoscopes, (and whenever one enters any new data), Ketu

does

> > not

> > > > > become any Karaka even if it is having an advanced

longitude.

> > Only

> > > > Rahu

> > > > > is being considered in the series of karakas depending upon

the

> > > > degree.

> > > > > Is there any reason for this?

> > > > >

> > > > > Learned members please help to clear the doubt.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > > Jyothi

>

[Guest guest]

Namaste Jyothi ji ,

 

Please do refer the following link :

http://varahamihira.blogspot.com/2005/02/karakas-i.html

 

Thanks ,

Sriram.

vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi"

<jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

>

> Dear nitin,

>

> Pls tell where I can find the reference (BPHS). Is there

any

> online reference?

>

> Regards,

> Jyothi

>

> vedic astrology, "Nitin" <astronitin>

> wrote:

> >

> > ||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

> >

> > Jyotish Ji and List Members, Namaskaar.

> >

> > Allow me to share som eof my understanding...

> >

> > As Chara karakas, there are lessons for the Jivatman to overcome

or

> > experience before merging with the parmatman.

> >

> > If you are liberated, you are not Jivatman...

> >

> > Nitin.

> > P.S. Did you look at the reference given in BPHS?

> >

> > || Namah Shivaaya ||

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi"

> > <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Nitin,

> > >

> > >

> > > Can you please explain furthur? The reason that ketu

is

> > > moksha karaka doesnt seem to me like a satisfactory one. If

Ketu

> can

> > > be included in the list of Naisargik/fixed karakas why not

> Temporal

> > > karakas?

> > > By temporary is it meant the temporary aspects of a being or

is

> it

> > > because of position of planets at ones brith time?

> > >

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > jyothi

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, "Nitin"

<astronitin>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > ||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

> > > >

> > > > Dear Jyothi Ji and List Members, Namaskaar.

> > > >

> > > > Allow me to share some of my understanding.

> > > >

> > > > Firstly, there are three types of significators (karakas)

> considered

> > > > in Jyotish:

> > > >

> > > > 1) Naisargik (natural) karakas

> > > > 2) Sthira (fixed) karakas

> > > > 3) Chara (temporal) karakas

> > > >

> > > > When considering the eight chara karaka scheme, we are

> considering

> > > > something temporal based on degrees.

> > > > [Paräsara: BPHS 34.13-15]

> > > >

> > > > What are the lessons of the Jivaatman before reaching the

> > > Parmatman?

> > > >

> > > > Since Ketu is Mokshakaraka, it is excluded from the Chara

> Karaka

> > > scheme.

> > > >

> > > > I hope this helps.

> > > >

> > > > Best wishes,

> > > > Nitin.

> > > >

> > > > || Namah Shivaaya ||

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > > > jyothi_b_lakshmi <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

> > > > > > Respected Sirs,

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I would like to know if Ketu will not be

> considered

> > > as

> > > > > > AK/AmK/PK/BK etc. and if not why. When I checked JHora,

all

> the

> > > > > sample

> > > > > > horoscopes, (and whenever one enters any new data), Ketu

> does

> > > not

> > > > > > become any Karaka even if it is having an advanced

> longitude.

> > > Only

> > > > > Rahu

> > > > > > is being considered in the series of karakas depending

upon

> the

> > > > > degree.

> > > > > > Is there any reason for this?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Learned members please help to clear the doubt.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > Jyothi

> >

>