To sriram, Why Ketu not considered as AK,,AmK, PK etc ??(Jyothi, et al)

[Guest guest]

Dear Sriram,

 

Thanks. It was a good article.

 

Regards,

jyothi

 

vedic astrology, "sriram_astro"

<sriram_astro> wrote:

>

> Namaste Jyothi ji ,

>

> Please do refer the following link :

> http://varahamihira.blogspot.com/2005/02/karakas-i.html

>

> Thanks ,

> Sriram.

> vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi"

> <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

> >

> > Dear nitin,

> >

> > Pls tell where I can find the reference (BPHS). Is there

> any

> > online reference?

> >

> > Regards,

> > Jyothi

> >

> > vedic astrology, "Nitin" <astronitin>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > ||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

> > >

> > > Jyotish Ji and List Members, Namaskaar.

> > >

> > > Allow me to share som eof my understanding...

> > >

> > > As Chara karakas, there are lessons for the Jivatman to

overcome

> or

> > > experience before merging with the parmatman.

> > >

> > > If you are liberated, you are not Jivatman...

> > >

> > > Nitin.

> > > P.S. Did you look at the reference given in BPHS?

> > >

> > > || Namah Shivaaya ||

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi"

> > > <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Nitin,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Can you please explain furthur? The reason that ketu

> is

> > > > moksha karaka doesnt seem to me like a satisfactory one. If

> Ketu

> > can

> > > > be included in the list of Naisargik/fixed karakas why not

> > Temporal

> > > > karakas?

> > > > By temporary is it meant the temporary aspects of a being or

> is

> > it

> > > > because of position of planets at ones brith time?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > > jyothi

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, "Nitin"

> <astronitin>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > ||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Jyothi Ji and List Members, Namaskaar.

> > > > >

> > > > > Allow me to share some of my understanding.

> > > > >

> > > > > Firstly, there are three types of significators (karakas)

> > considered

> > > > > in Jyotish:

> > > > >

> > > > > 1) Naisargik (natural) karakas

> > > > > 2) Sthira (fixed) karakas

> > > > > 3) Chara (temporal) karakas

> > > > >

> > > > > When considering the eight chara karaka scheme, we are

> > considering

> > > > > something temporal based on degrees.

> > > > > [Paräsara: BPHS 34.13-15]

> > > > >

> > > > > What are the lessons of the Jivaatman before reaching the

> > > > Parmatman?

> > > > >

> > > > > Since Ketu is Mokshakaraka, it is excluded from the Chara

> > Karaka

> > > > scheme.

> > > > >

> > > > > I hope this helps.

> > > > >

> > > > > Best wishes,

> > > > > Nitin.

> > > > >

> > > > > || Namah Shivaaya ||

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > > > jyothi_b_lakshmi <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

> > > > > > > Respected Sirs,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I would like to know if Ketu will not be

> > considered

> > > > as

> > > > > > > AK/AmK/PK/BK etc. and if not why. When I checked JHora,

> all

> > the

> > > > > > sample

> > > > > > > horoscopes, (and whenever one enters any new data),

Ketu

> > does

> > > > not

> > > > > > > become any Karaka even if it is having an advanced

> > longitude.

> > > > Only

> > > > > > Rahu

> > > > > > > is being considered in the series of karakas depending

> upon

> > the

> > > > > > degree.

> > > > > > > Is there any reason for this?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Learned members please help to clear the doubt.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > Jyothi

> > >

> >

>