to Sriram.

[Guest guest]

<sriram_astro> wrote:>> Namaste Jyothi ji ,> > Please do refer the

following link :> http://varahamihira.blogspot.com/2005/02/karakas-i.html> >

Thanks ,> Sriram.> vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi" >

<jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:> >> > Dear nitin,> > > > Pls tell where I

can find the reference (BPHS). Is there > any > > online reference?> > > >

Regards,> > Jyothi> > > > vedic astrology, "Nitin"

<astronitin> > > wrote:> > >> > > ||| Hare Rama Krishna |||> > > > > >

Jyotish Ji and List Members, Namaskaar.> > > > > > Allow me to share

som eof my understanding...> > > > > > As Chara karakas, there are lessons for

the Jivatman to overcome > or> > > experience before merging with the

parmatman. > > > > > > If you are liberated, you are not Jivatman...> > > > > >

Nitin.> > > P.S. Did you look at the reference given in BPHS?> > > > > > ||

Namah Shivaaya ||> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In

vedic astrology, "jyothi_b_lakshmi"> > >

<jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Nitin,> > > > > > > > > > > >

Can you please explain furthur? The reason that ketu > is > > > >

moksha karaka doesnt seem to me like a

satisfactory one. If > Ketu > > can > > > > be included in the list of

Naisargik/fixed karakas why not > > Temporal > > > > karakas? > > > > By

temporary is it meant the temporary aspects of a being or > is > > it > > > >

because of position of planets at ones brith time?> > > > > > > > > > > >

Regards,> > > > jyothi> > > > > > > > vedic astrology,

"Nitin" > <astronitin> > > > > wrote:> > > > >> > > > > ||| Hare Rama

Krishna |||> > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyothi Ji and List Members, Namaskaar. > >

> > > > > > > > Allow me to share some of my understanding. > > > > > > > > > >

Firstly, there are three types of significators (karakas) > > considered> > > >

> in Jyotish:> > > > > > > > > > 1) Naisargik (natural) karakas> > > > > 2)

Sthira (fixed) karakas> > > > > 3) Chara (temporal) karakas> > > > > > > > > >

When considering the eight chara karaka scheme, we are > > considering> > > > >

something temporal based on degrees. > > > > > [Paräsara: BPHS 34.13-15]> > > >

> > > > > > What are the lessons of the Jivaatman before reaching the > > > >

Parmatman? > > > > > > > > > > Since Ketu is Mokshakaraka, it is excluded from

the Chara > > Karaka > > > > scheme. > > > > > > > > > > I hope this helps. > >

>

> > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > Nitin.> > > > > > > > > > || Namah Shivaaya

||> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

jyothi_b_lakshmi <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:> > > > > > > Respected Sirs,>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to know if Ketu

will not be > > considered > > > > as > > > > > > > AK/AmK/PK/BK etc. and if

not why. When I checked JHora, > all > > the > > > > > > sample > > > > > > >

horoscopes, (and whenever one enters any new

data), Ketu > > does > > > > not > > > > > > > become any Karaka even if it is

having an advanced > > longitude. > > > > Only > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > >

is being considered in the series of karakas depending > upon > > the > > > > >

> degree. > > > > > > > Is there any reason for this?> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Learned members please help to clear the doubt. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > Jyothi> > >> >> Send instant messages to your

online friends http://au.messenger.