Ketu dristi or not... how about exception

[Guest guest]

hey, this is a good pile of rulings!

 

Dear Members,

May I add one more layer to the rich Rahu-Ketu pile of divergence.

Translator Mr Sareen in his translation of Chamatkar Chintamani

(Sagar Publications) says when they are in their own houses Rahu and

Ketu do not cast aspect. This nifty rule is of course outside the

purview of the text of the Sanscrit classic, and thus has nothing to

do with it; it comes in a preliminary section in the book in

English.

 

Now, what do we do with this rule unless we first settle which their

own houses (as also mooltrikona and uchcha rasis) are?

 

Let's put our head together to sort this out

 

Best,

RK Dash

________________

 

tw853 <tw853 wrote:

References regarding Nodal Aspects

 

1. Uttara Kalamrita by Kalidasa, by Dr. P. S. Sastri, Edition 2001,

page 43 under "Notes" (According to Parasara, Rahu aspects 5, 7, 9,

and 12 fully, 2 and 10 by half, and 3 and 6 by quarter.)

 

2. J. N. Bhasin: Art of Prediction, 2002(First Edition 1982), page

16 (Jupiter-like 5,7 & 9 aspects)

 

3. James Braha: The Art & Practice of Ancient Hindu Astrology, 2001,

p 388-390 (according to sage Parasara 5,7 & 9 aspects)

 

4. Sanjay Rath: Vimsottari & Udu Dasaa, Jyotish Foundation chapter,

1.4.1.4; 1.4.1.5, 1.4.1.9

 

http://www.sjcerc.com/resources/books/vud/

 

5. Sanjay Rath: Crux of Vedic Astrology, 1998, page 115, 117, 119,

133, 139, 181, 249 etc

 

6. P.V.R. Narasimha Rao: Lessons on Vedic Astrology, Lesson 4, Key

Points 12

 

http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net/book1.htm

 

7. V.K. Choudhry: System's Approach for Interpreting Horoscopes,

2002 (First Edition 1991), page 7 (Jupiter-like 5,7 & 9 aspects)

 

8. David Hawthorne, V.K. Choudhry: Astrology for Life, 2000, page 9

(Jupiter-like 5, 7 & 9th aspects)

 

9. Bal Krishna Singh Hatia: K.P. & Astrlogy, Year Book 1999,

page 26 (Rahu `s

5th and 9th aspects)

 

10. K. Balachandran: .P. & Astrlogy, Year Book 2002, page 82 & 84

(Kethu's 7th, 9th and 12th aspects)

[Guest guest]

Dear RK Dash ji,

If all the 12 signs are already alotted for the 7 planets, then

what is the point in trying to figure out, which is the Own house and

Moolatrikona of Ra and Ke? (Remember all the confusions regarding

this)

Shall I ask you an intersting question?

If the lordship of houses are alotted based on the speed of the

planets, which house you will alote to Ra and which to Ke?

If your answer falls into 2 different houses, then I would ask,

Why?

If drishti is relative angle between planets, then Drishti for Ra

and Ke is acceptable to a certain extent, and we have the support of

Parasara as well (though none else).

 

What is Ucha Rasi and What is Moola trikona rasi? We have to answer

this question first. Then only we can settle the question on Ucha

Rasi and Moolatrikona Rasi of Ra and Ke. Have you ever tried to

collect all the slokas that says about the

Ucha/Swakshetra/Moolatrikona Rasi of Ra and Ke? Try to do it. You

will find some interesting results.

Love,

Sreenadh

 

vedic astrology, "arkaydash" <arkaydash

wrote:

>

>

> hey, this is a good pile of rulings!

>

> Dear Members,

> May I add one more layer to the rich Rahu-Ketu pile of divergence.

> Translator Mr Sareen in his translation of Chamatkar Chintamani

> (Sagar Publications) says when they are in their own houses Rahu

and

> Ketu do not cast aspect. This nifty rule is of course outside the

> purview of the text of the Sanscrit classic, and thus has nothing

to

> do with it; it comes in a preliminary section in the book in

> English.

>

> Now, what do we do with this rule unless we first settle which

their

> own houses (as also mooltrikona and uchcha rasis) are?

>

> Let's put our head together to sort this out

>

> Best,

> RK Dash

> ________________

>

> tw853 <tw853 wrote:

> References regarding Nodal Aspects

>

> 1. Uttara Kalamrita by Kalidasa, by Dr. P. S. Sastri, Edition 2001,

> page 43 under "Notes" (According to Parasara, Rahu aspects 5, 7, 9,

> and 12 fully, 2 and 10 by half, and 3 and 6 by quarter.)

>

> 2. J. N. Bhasin: Art of Prediction, 2002(First Edition 1982), page

> 16 (Jupiter-like 5,7 & 9 aspects)

>

> 3. James Braha: The Art & Practice of Ancient Hindu Astrology,

2001,

> p 388-390 (according to sage Parasara 5,7 & 9 aspects)

>

> 4. Sanjay Rath: Vimsottari & Udu Dasaa, Jyotish Foundation chapter,

> 1.4.1.4; 1.4.1.5, 1.4.1.9

>

> http://www.sjcerc.com/resources/books/vud/

>

> 5. Sanjay Rath: Crux of Vedic Astrology, 1998, page 115, 117,

119,

> 133, 139, 181, 249 etc

>

> 6. P.V.R. Narasimha Rao: Lessons on Vedic Astrology, Lesson 4, Key

> Points 12

>

> http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net/book1.htm

>

> 7. V.K. Choudhry: System's Approach for Interpreting Horoscopes,

> 2002 (First Edition 1991), page 7 (Jupiter-like 5,7 & 9 aspects)

>

> 8. David Hawthorne, V.K. Choudhry: Astrology for Life, 2000, page

9

> (Jupiter-like 5, 7 & 9th aspects)

>

> 9. Bal Krishna Singh Hatia: K.P. & Astrlogy, Year Book 1999,

> page 26 (Rahu `s

> 5th and 9th aspects)

>

> 10. K. Balachandran: .P. & Astrlogy, Year Book 2002, page 82 & 84

> (Kethu's 7th, 9th and 12th aspects)

>