Guest guest Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 Dear Respected members I am posting my understanding on the subject.Kindly verify. Spouse is sometimes termed as PraanaSakhi(beloved companion of Prana).Also Spouse is known as one half of Prana.Shiva and Shakthi and Ardhanareeshwara - any connection?. Now Navamshas represent Navapranas as per Dashadhyayi. Combining own understanding(can be wrong) with authentic words of Thalakkulathu Bhattathiri(Dashadhyayi author) - relationship between Navamsha and Spouse can be linked. Thus studying the navamsha sambandha of a graha on relevant bhavas or Karaka planets,as mentioned in Classics seems to be correct and pretty clear than the contemporary understanding of Navamsha analysis.It is my personal opinion and other learned members can very well disagree. Thanks Pradeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 Vijaydas ji, I have always found it very interesting that navamsha has been recommended as the chart that talks about marriage and spouse while saptamamsha represents the children. There is a certain (though not perfect) correlation/association between some of the harmonic slices that vargas represent and sometimes interpreted so and the order of houses: Rashi (divided by 1, the primary or central frequency sonically speaking) the first house Hora (sign divided by 2) 2nd house (wealth etc) Drekkana/Dreshkana/Dreshkona (divisor is 3) 3rd house - siblings Turyamsha - sukh, 4th harmonic The comes the first tangent! Saptamamsha (7th but represents children -- 5th house) Navamsha (9th harmonic but represents 7th and not 9th house) Dashamsha (10th - house and harmonic and profession) and the rail gets back on the patari. Now if we go around the zodiac again, some of the remaining fit, others don't within this scheme! But why is saptamamsha representing the children/5th house and navamsha the 7th house? I think it was Narasimha who at one time, years ago connected the concept of navamsha representing the Dharmapatni. It clicked conceptually and dare I say -- intuitively. Have I tested this in many charts (my own question to others, generally that gets me in deep hot waters!). NO! I have not. But the happily married few that I have known and met do confirm in words and actions that there is always a great woman behind a great man! What would yang be without the right YIN? What or where would a Concorde jet be without the right fuel! The fuel burns away but we just look at the Concorde in awe! Now there are some brahmacharis who have reached great heights but has there been a Great Woman behind their success too? A mother sometimes, a sister at other times? Research questions! And how did the navamsha explain that link? Or did it? So, is navamsha not about just patni, though in most cases it might be so. Maybe it is just about our dharmic acts or as astro- accountants might want to call it -- about our DHARMIC ledger! Another research and exploration question. Would be interesting to examine if the dharmic influence deciphered through navamsha always manifests in this worldly reality as someone from the other gender, nature of relationships notwithstanding? And I also sense your other question within the question. Is navamsha a chart or just a point of power? So many complex questions! Hopefully I did not mislead anyone! RR vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" <vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > Dear Respected members > > I am posting my understanding on the subject.Kindly verify. > > Spouse is sometimes termed as PraanaSakhi(beloved companion of > Prana).Also Spouse is known as one half of Prana.Shiva and Shakthi and > Ardhanareeshwara - any connection?. > > Now Navamshas represent Navapranas as per Dashadhyayi. > > Combining own understanding(can be wrong) with authentic words of > Thalakkulathu Bhattathiri(Dashadhyayi author) - relationship between > Navamsha and Spouse can be linked. > > Thus studying the navamsha sambandha of a graha on relevant bhavas or > Karaka planets,as mentioned in Classics seems to be correct and pretty > clear than the contemporary understanding of Navamsha analysis.It is my > personal opinion and other learned members can very well disagree. > > Thanks > Pradeep > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2006 Report Share Posted May 14, 2006 Respected Sir, Some thoughts and some doubts: Great woman behind a Great man - Why only great? Isnt there a (common) woman behind every (common)Man and vice versa? Can the YIN behind a YANG be considered on the same level as sister/mother against a wife/lover? I mean,Is the YIN-YANG attraction that of a man <->mother/sister. No. Am I Correct? A mother/sister can be a motivation/ support, but what actually fuels up the creativity? I really doubt if it is a sisterly/motherly affection. If one check the 'source of creativity' behind great men, rarely one finds a 'sisterly/motherly' source,though it is also not uncommon. But most of the time it was in the form of a lover, and need not be always wife. Is one's spouse always the perfect complimentary soul? (Again I think No-Then everybody would have been leading a perfect married life. Right? I would like to know what denotes in a chart, the perfect complimentary soul of a person? (Assuming it need not be always ones spouse). Is that the navamsa? (Then where does the spouse go?) (Just some grey areas..) Regards, Jyothi vedic astrology, "crystal pages" <rrgb wrote: > > Vijaydas ji, > > I have always found it very interesting that navamsha has been > recommended as the chart that talks about marriage and spouse while > saptamamsha represents the children. > > There is a certain (though not perfect) correlation/association > between some of the harmonic slices that vargas represent and > sometimes interpreted so and the order of houses: > Rashi (divided by 1, the primary or central frequency sonically > speaking) the first house > Hora (sign divided by 2) 2nd house (wealth etc) > Drekkana/Dreshkana/Dreshkona (divisor is 3) 3rd house - siblings > Turyamsha - sukh, 4th harmonic > The comes the first tangent! > Saptamamsha (7th but represents children -- 5th house) > Navamsha (9th harmonic but represents 7th and not 9th house) > Dashamsha (10th - house and harmonic and profession) and the rail > gets back on the patari. > > Now if we go around the zodiac again, some of the remaining fit, > others don't within this scheme! > > But why is saptamamsha representing the children/5th house and > navamsha the 7th house? > > I think it was Narasimha who at one time, years ago connected the > concept of navamsha representing the Dharmapatni. It clicked > conceptually and dare I say -- intuitively. Have I tested this in > many charts (my own question to others, generally that gets me in > deep hot waters!). NO! I have not. But the happily married few that I > have known and met do confirm in words and actions that there is > always a great woman behind a great man! What would yang be without > the right YIN? What or where would a Concorde jet be without the > right fuel! The fuel burns away but we just look at the Concorde in > awe! > > Now there are some brahmacharis who have reached great heights but > has there been a Great Woman behind their success too? A mother > sometimes, a sister at other times? Research questions! > > And how did the navamsha explain that link? Or did it? > > So, is navamsha not about just patni, though in most cases it might > be so. Maybe it is just about our dharmic acts or as astro- > accountants might want to call it -- about our DHARMIC ledger! > Another research and exploration question. Would be interesting to > examine if the dharmic influence deciphered through navamsha always > manifests in this worldly reality as someone from the other gender, > nature of relationships notwithstanding? > > And I also sense your other question within the question. Is navamsha > a chart or just a point of power? > > So many complex questions! Hopefully I did not mislead anyone! > > RR > > > > vedic astrology, "vijayadas_pradeep" > <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote: > > > > Dear Respected members > > > > I am posting my understanding on the subject.Kindly verify. > > > > Spouse is sometimes termed as PraanaSakhi(beloved companion of > > Prana).Also Spouse is known as one half of Prana.Shiva and Shakthi > and > > Ardhanareeshwara - any connection?. > > > > Now Navamshas represent Navapranas as per Dashadhyayi. > > > > Combining own understanding(can be wrong) with authentic words of > > Thalakkulathu Bhattathiri(Dashadhyayi author) - relationship between > > Navamsha and Spouse can be linked. > > > > Thus studying the navamsha sambandha of a graha on relevant bhavas > or > > Karaka planets,as mentioned in Classics seems to be correct and > pretty > > clear than the contemporary understanding of Navamsha analysis.It > is my > > personal opinion and other learned members can very well disagree. > > > > Thanks > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.