Kendradhipathi Dosha Vs. Maha Purusha Yoga

[Guest guest]

Dear learned members,

 

"Benefics, if they become owners of Kendras do not bestow good on men."

 

Then on the other hand when "Jupiter, Venus & Mercury are in Kendras in

own house or exalted give Maha Purusha Yoga."

 

So for example in a Vrushika Lagna or Aries Lagna native if natal Venus

is in the 7th house or for a Gemini native Jupiter is in the 7th or 10

th house etc. etc. what conclusion can one come upon since the above 2

rules bring contradictory results?

 

Kindly explain.

 

Thank you,

 

Blessings

 

Renuji

[Guest guest]

This is an interesting instance about mutually contradictory

positions. Another one is described in BPHS which indicates that

presence of jupiter, mercury or venus alone in a kendra would remove

all evils in a chart.

In the chapter before this one, combinations are given where jupiter

is in the first house and in one case the combination kills the

mother and in another, it kills the father.

 

RR

 

vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw wrote:

>

> Dear learned members,

>

> "Benefics, if they become owners of Kendras do not bestow good on

men."

>

> Then on the other hand when "Jupiter, Venus & Mercury are in

Kendras in

> own house or exalted give Maha Purusha Yoga."

>

> So for example in a Vrushika Lagna or Aries Lagna native if natal

Venus

> is in the 7th house or for a Gemini native Jupiter is in the 7th

or 10

> th house etc. etc. what conclusion can one come upon since the

above 2

> rules bring contradictory results?

>

> Kindly explain.

>

> Thank you,

>

> Blessings

>

> Renuji

>

[Guest guest]

Om Shri Gurave Namah

Dear friend,

To be owner and to be posited in a house are two different things. When a

benefic planet is owner of Kendra he will not be able to his his benefic

results. but when he is posited in Kendra, he will give auspicious results. When

a planet is exalted or posited in own sign he gets strenghth and give more

auspicious results.

 

 

renunw <renunw wrote: Dear learned members,

 

"Benefics, if they become owners of Kendras do not bestow good on men."

 

Then on the other hand when "Jupiter, Venus & Mercury are in Kendras in

own house or exalted give Maha Purusha Yoga."

 

So for example in a Vrushika Lagna or Aries Lagna native if natal Venus

is in the 7th house or for a Gemini native Jupiter is in the 7th or 10

th house etc. etc. what conclusion can one come upon since the above 2

rules bring contradictory results?

 

Kindly explain.

 

Thank you,

 

Blessings

 

Renuji

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

 

 

 

 

Astrology chart

Vedic astrology Astrology horoscope

Astrology software

 

 

 

 

Visit your group "vedic astrology" on the web.

 

vedic astrology

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+

countries) for 2¢/min or less.

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Renuji:

 

Kendradhipathya dosha arises by mere ownership of kendras by

benefics. It does not take into account the disposition of the

benefic planets in question. It is based on the dictum that malefics

owning the kendra houses bestow good results while benefics get

afflicted by ownership of kendra houses.

 

Pancha Mahaa Purusha Yogaa's are based on both ownership or

exaltation (the planetary dignity) of the "real planets" and also

their disposition; i.e, the planet concerned should be strongly

placed in a kendra house at the same time being in its own or

exaltation houses. Thus, when Pancha Maha Purusha Yoga operates in a

horoscope, you should deem that the kendradhipathya dosha is not

operational in the horoscope.

 

One important point to note about Pancha Mahaa Purusha Yogas is that

the planet giving rise to the yoga should be well-placed within the

sign of its ownership/ exaltation also, i.e, it should not be in the

early degrees or near the end of the sign in which case, its avastha

will not be strong (Baala or Vriddha avasthaas which are not

promising for results). Another factor is that the planet should be

free from afflictions arising from conjuction or aspect of malefics.

Only if the planets are free from all blemishes and at the same time

satisfy the criteria for Pancha Mahaa purusha yoga, the actual good

results will be felt. Here, Samudrika Lakshanaas (Physiognomy) will

be handy to see if the yoga is operational or not. All the maha

purusha yogaas have some samudrika lakshanaas ascribed to them. For

a person in whose horoscopes, the yoga is manifest fully, the

samudrika lakshanaas will be quite perceptible. If the appearance of

the person is not in conformity with the samudrika lakshana described

for the yoga, then you should consider that the yoga is not fully

operational in the horoscope. In fact, I have had many persons asking

me why the Pancha Maha Purusha yogas in their horoscopes are not

helping them with exalted status......The reason is that the yoga is

not manifest or is blemished due to evil associations!

 

In short, a fully manifest pancha mahaa purusha yoga will cancel the

kendradhipathya dosha in a horoscope.

 

Blessed be.

Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

 

vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw wrote:

>

> Dear learned members,

>

> "Benefics, if they become owners of Kendras do not bestow good on

men."

>

> Then on the other hand when "Jupiter, Venus & Mercury are in

Kendras in

> own house or exalted give Maha Purusha Yoga."

>

> So for example in a Vrushika Lagna or Aries Lagna native if natal

Venus

> is in the 7th house or for a Gemini native Jupiter is in the 7th

or 10

> th house etc. etc. what conclusion can one come upon since the

above 2

> rules bring contradictory results?

>

> Kindly explain.

>

> Thank you,

>

> Blessings

>

> Renuji

>

[Guest guest]

Dear respected Sir Dakshinamoorthji,

 

Thank you very much for your lucid explanation. I do understand the

difference now. Just one query sir. I have read that Jupiter's

exalted position is upto 05 degrees in Cancer. Then isn't it in its

baala avastha? Does that mean though Jupiter is exalted and assuming

unafflicted too, yet Hamsa Maha Purusha yoga is not in full operation?

 

Thank you once again sir,

 

Blessings

 

Renu

vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

<dakshinastrologer wrote:

>

> Dear Renuji:

>

> Kendradhipathya dosha arises by mere ownership of kendras by

> benefics. It does not take into account the disposition of the

> benefic planets in question. It is based on the dictum that

malefics

> owning the kendra houses bestow good results while benefics get

> afflicted by ownership of kendra houses.

>

> Pancha Mahaa Purusha Yogaa's are based on both ownership or

> exaltation (the planetary dignity) of the "real planets" and also

> their disposition; i.e, the planet concerned should be strongly

> placed in a kendra house at the same time being in its own or

> exaltation houses. Thus, when Pancha Maha Purusha Yoga operates in

a

> horoscope, you should deem that the kendradhipathya dosha is not

> operational in the horoscope.

>

> One important point to note about Pancha Mahaa Purusha Yogas is

that

> the planet giving rise to the yoga should be well-placed within the

> sign of its ownership/ exaltation also, i.e, it should not be in

the

> early degrees or near the end of the sign in which case, its

avastha

> will not be strong (Baala or Vriddha avasthaas which are not

> promising for results). Another factor is that the planet should

be

> free from afflictions arising from conjuction or aspect of

malefics.

> Only if the planets are free from all blemishes and at the same

time

> satisfy the criteria for Pancha Mahaa purusha yoga, the actual good

> results will be felt. Here, Samudrika Lakshanaas (Physiognomy)

will

> be handy to see if the yoga is operational or not. All the maha

> purusha yogaas have some samudrika lakshanaas ascribed to them.

For

> a person in whose horoscopes, the yoga is manifest fully, the

> samudrika lakshanaas will be quite perceptible. If the appearance

of

> the person is not in conformity with the samudrika lakshana

described

> for the yoga, then you should consider that the yoga is not fully

> operational in the horoscope. In fact, I have had many persons

asking

> me why the Pancha Maha Purusha yogas in their horoscopes are not

> helping them with exalted status......The reason is that the yoga

is

> not manifest or is blemished due to evil associations!

>

> In short, a fully manifest pancha mahaa purusha yoga will cancel

the

> kendradhipathya dosha in a horoscope.

>

> Blessed be.

> Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

>

> vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear learned members,

> >

> > "Benefics, if they become owners of Kendras do not bestow good on

> men."

> >

> > Then on the other hand when "Jupiter, Venus & Mercury are in

> Kendras in

> > own house or exalted give Maha Purusha Yoga."

> >

> > So for example in a Vrushika Lagna or Aries Lagna native if natal

> Venus

> > is in the 7th house or for a Gemini native Jupiter is in the 7th

> or 10

> > th house etc. etc. what conclusion can one come upon since the

> above 2

> > rules bring contradictory results?

> >

> > Kindly explain.

> >

> > Thank you,

> >

> > Blessings

> >

> > Renuji

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Shri sckursija ji,

 

The point that the poster was making was that in the example, venus

was not only kendradhipati but also placed in kendra. Which one would

prevail? The kendradhipatya dosh rule or the malavya yoga mahapurusha

yoga kendra rule? It was a very valid question and no confusion was

involved.

 

The answer, rather than opinion would involve viewing several charts

with the same lagna rising, but venus in the other kendras. Then

compare that with an individual in whose horoscope (same lagna) venus

is placed in the fifth!

 

That would mean hard work and long hours! Who does that anymore. It

is a lot easier to just ask on a forum, but does that solve the

confusion, the doubt?

 

:-)

 

RR

 

 

vedic astrology, "S.C. Kursija"

<sckursija wrote:

>

> Om Shri Gurave Namah

> Dear friend,

> To be owner and to be posited in a house are two different things.

When a benefic planet is owner of Kendra he will not be able to his

his benefic results. but when he is posited in Kendra, he will give

auspicious results. When a planet is exalted or posited in own sign

he gets strenghth and give more auspicious results.

>

>

> renunw <renunw wrote: Dear learned members,

>

> "Benefics, if they become owners of Kendras do not bestow good on

men."

>

> Then on the other hand when "Jupiter, Venus & Mercury are in

Kendras in

> own house or exalted give Maha Purusha Yoga."

>

> So for example in a Vrushika Lagna or Aries Lagna native if natal

Venus

> is in the 7th house or for a Gemini native Jupiter is in the 7th

or 10

> th house etc. etc. what conclusion can one come upon since the

above 2

> rules bring contradictory results?

>

> Kindly explain.

>

> Thank you,

>

> Blessings

>

> Renuji

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Astrology

chart Vedic

astrology Astrology

horoscope

Astrology

software

>

>

>

>

>

> Visit your group "vedic astrology" on the web.

>

>

> vedic astrology

>

> Terms of

Service.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and

30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Namaste,

 

Kendradhipathya dosha would arise when natural benefic viz.,Jupiter and Venus

own other than the Lagna Kendra.Non afflicited Mercury and non afflicted Moon

when they own other than than the Lagna Kendra they too bestow dosha but not to

the extant of Jupiter and Venus.

 

Pancha Mahapurusha Yoga formed by non-luminaries, viz., Mars and Saturn in their

own sign or in exaltation it should also be a cardinal house.Mercury, Jupiter,

Venus bestows the above yoga when they are in their own sign as Lagna Kendra or

in their exalted cardinal house. Each of these nonluminaries forms the yoga

singly, and each of them has a separate name and effect. Ruchaka yoga is formed

by such a placement of Mars Bhadra by mercury, Hamsa by Jupiter, Malavya by

Venus, and Sasa Yoga by Saturn. They produce the following results:

 

Ruchaka Yoga: Strong physique, well versed in ancient love, conforms to

tradition and customs, and becomes famous. Such an individual also becomes

wealthy, lives for long, and leads a group of men or an army.

 

Bhadra Yoga: Strong physique with a lion-like face. The individual is helpful to

relatives and attains a high intellectual eminence.

 

Hamsa Yoga: A righteous person, graceful in appearance, considerate, devoted to

gods and higher life, and ritualistic in religious observances.

 

Malavya Yoga: Essentially a family person, preoccupied with domestic

responsibilities and surrounded by children and grandchildren. He possesses

personal vehicle, residential house, and other necessities of life.

 

Sasa Yoga: Sensuous, occultist, leader of non-traditional and anti-social

elements. Fearless and capable of performing arduous deeds.

 

Based on the above arguments I am of the opinion that Kendrathipathya dosha and

Pancha Mahapurusha yoga are not contradictory to each other.

 

I request the SJC'S Guru / Shri.Gupta ji to offer their expert opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

renunw <renunw wrote: Dear learned members,

 

"Benefics, if they become owners of Kendras do not bestow good on men."

 

Then on the other hand when "Jupiter, Venus & Mercury are in Kendras in

own house or exalted give Maha Purusha Yoga."

 

So for example in a Vrushika Lagna or Aries Lagna native if natal Venus

is in the 7th house or for a Gemini native Jupiter is in the 7th or 10

th house etc. etc. what conclusion can one come upon since the above 2

rules bring contradictory results?

 

Kindly explain.

 

Thank you,

 

Blessings

 

Renuji

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

 

 

 

 

Astrology chart

Vedic astrology Astrology horoscope

Astrology software

 

 

 

 

Visit your group "vedic astrology" on the web.

 

vedic astrology

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear learned members,

 

I thank everybody who generously contributed their knowledge to my

querie.

 

Blessings

 

Renuji

 

vedic astrology, KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM

<munisevitham wrote:

>

> Namaste,

>

> Kendradhipathya dosha would arise when natural benefic viz.,Jupiter

and Venus own other than the Lagna Kendra.Non afflicited Mercury and

non afflicted Moon when they own other than than the Lagna Kendra

they too bestow dosha but not to the extant of Jupiter and Venus.

>

> Pancha Mahapurusha Yoga formed by non-luminaries, viz., Mars and

Saturn in their own sign or in exaltation it should also be a

cardinal house.Mercury, Jupiter, Venus bestows the above yoga when

they are in their own sign as Lagna Kendra or in their exalted

cardinal house. Each of these nonluminaries forms the yoga singly,

and each of them has a separate name and effect. Ruchaka yoga is

formed by such a placement of Mars Bhadra by mercury, Hamsa by

Jupiter, Malavya by Venus, and Sasa Yoga by Saturn. They produce the

following results:

>

> Ruchaka Yoga: Strong physique, well versed in ancient love,

conforms to tradition and customs, and becomes famous. Such an

individual also becomes wealthy, lives for long, and leads a group of

men or an army.

>

> Bhadra Yoga: Strong physique with a lion-like face. The individual

is helpful to relatives and attains a high intellectual eminence.

>

> Hamsa Yoga: A righteous person, graceful in appearance,

considerate, devoted to gods and higher life, and ritualistic in

religious observances.

>

> Malavya Yoga: Essentially a family person, preoccupied with

domestic responsibilities and surrounded by children and

grandchildren. He possesses personal vehicle, residential house, and

other necessities of life.

>

> Sasa Yoga: Sensuous, occultist, leader of non-traditional and anti-

social elements. Fearless and capable of performing arduous deeds.

>

> Based on the above arguments I am of the opinion that

Kendrathipathya dosha and Pancha Mahapurusha yoga are not

contradictory to each other.

>

> I request the SJC'S Guru / Shri.Gupta ji to offer their expert

opinion.

>

renunw <renunw wrote: Dear learned members,

>

> "Benefics, if they become owners of Kendras do not bestow good on

men."

>

> Then on the other hand when "Jupiter, Venus & Mercury are in

Kendras in

> own house or exalted give Maha Purusha Yoga."

>

> So for example in a Vrushika Lagna or Aries Lagna native if natal

Venus

> is in the 7th house or for a Gemini native Jupiter is in the 7th

or 10

> th house etc. etc. what conclusion can one come upon since the

above 2

> rules bring contradictory results?

>

> Kindly explain.

>

> Thank you,

>

> Blessings

>

> Renuji

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Astrology

chart Vedic

astrology Astrology

horoscope

Astrology

software

>

>

>

>

>

> Visit your group "vedic astrology" on the web.

>

>

> vedic astrology

>

> Terms of

Service.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> New Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC

and save big.

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Renuji:

 

In this case, Jupiter in its deepest exaltation ( 5 degrees of

Cancer) will actually make the Hamsa yoga fully operational. The

same logic would go for Mars and Venus which get exalted in 28th

degree of Capricorn and 27th degree of Pisces respectively....Though

they are in Vridda avastha, their being in the point of deep

exaltation would make them fully powerful to confer the Maha yogaas.

I should have made this clarification in my earlier mail itself.

 

I hope it is now clear.

 

Blessed be.

Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

 

vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw wrote:

>

> Dear respected Sir Dakshinamoorthji,

>

> Thank you very much for your lucid explanation. I do understand the

> difference now. Just one query sir. I have read that Jupiter's

> exalted position is upto 05 degrees in Cancer. Then isn't it in its

> baala avastha? Does that mean though Jupiter is exalted and

assuming

> unafflicted too, yet Hamsa Maha Purusha yoga is not in full

operation?

>

> Thank you once again sir,

>

> Blessings

>

> Renu

> vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

> <dakshinastrologer@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Renuji:

> >

> > Kendradhipathya dosha arises by mere ownership of kendras by

> > benefics. It does not take into account the disposition of the

> > benefic planets in question. It is based on the dictum that

> malefics

> > owning the kendra houses bestow good results while benefics get

> > afflicted by ownership of kendra houses.

> >

> > Pancha Mahaa Purusha Yogaa's are based on both ownership or

> > exaltation (the planetary dignity) of the "real planets" and also

> > their disposition; i.e, the planet concerned should be strongly

> > placed in a kendra house at the same time being in its own or

> > exaltation houses. Thus, when Pancha Maha Purusha Yoga operates

in

> a

> > horoscope, you should deem that the kendradhipathya dosha is not

> > operational in the horoscope.

> >

> > One important point to note about Pancha Mahaa Purusha Yogas is

> that

> > the planet giving rise to the yoga should be well-placed within

the

> > sign of its ownership/ exaltation also, i.e, it should not be in

> the

> > early degrees or near the end of the sign in which case, its

> avastha

> > will not be strong (Baala or Vriddha avasthaas which are not

> > promising for results). Another factor is that the planet should

> be

> > free from afflictions arising from conjuction or aspect of

> malefics.

> > Only if the planets are free from all blemishes and at the same

> time

> > satisfy the criteria for Pancha Mahaa purusha yoga, the actual

good

> > results will be felt. Here, Samudrika Lakshanaas (Physiognomy)

> will

> > be handy to see if the yoga is operational or not. All the maha

> > purusha yogaas have some samudrika lakshanaas ascribed to them.

> For

> > a person in whose horoscopes, the yoga is manifest fully, the

> > samudrika lakshanaas will be quite perceptible. If the

appearance

> of

> > the person is not in conformity with the samudrika lakshana

> described

> > for the yoga, then you should consider that the yoga is not fully

> > operational in the horoscope. In fact, I have had many persons

> asking

> > me why the Pancha Maha Purusha yogas in their horoscopes are not

> > helping them with exalted status......The reason is that the yoga

> is

> > not manifest or is blemished due to evil associations!

> >

> > In short, a fully manifest pancha mahaa purusha yoga will cancel

> the

> > kendradhipathya dosha in a horoscope.

> >

> > Blessed be.

> > Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> >

> > vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear learned members,

> > >

> > > "Benefics, if they become owners of Kendras do not bestow good

on

> > men."

> > >

> > > Then on the other hand when "Jupiter, Venus & Mercury are in

> > Kendras in

> > > own house or exalted give Maha Purusha Yoga."

> > >

> > > So for example in a Vrushika Lagna or Aries Lagna native if

natal

> > Venus

> > > is in the 7th house or for a Gemini native Jupiter is in the

7th

> > or 10

> > > th house etc. etc. what conclusion can one come upon since the

> > above 2

> > > rules bring contradictory results?

> > >

> > > Kindly explain.

> > >

> > > Thank you,

> > >

> > > Blessings

> > >

> > > Renuji

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Sir

 

Also, the directional strength has got to make the planet working

towards yoga. if the planet lacks directional strength, it often fails

to deliver - irrespective of other strength.

 

regards / Prafulla

 

vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

<dakshinastrologer wrote:

>

> Dear Renuji:

>

> In this case, Jupiter in its deepest exaltation ( 5 degrees of

> Cancer) will actually make the Hamsa yoga fully operational. The

> same logic would go for Mars and Venus which get exalted in 28th

> degree of Capricorn and 27th degree of Pisces respectively....Though

> they are in Vridda avastha, their being in the point of deep

> exaltation would make them fully powerful to confer the Maha yogaas.

> I should have made this clarification in my earlier mail itself.

>

> I hope it is now clear.

>

> Blessed be.

> Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

>

> vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear respected Sir Dakshinamoorthji,

> >

> > Thank you very much for your lucid explanation. I do understand the

> > difference now. Just one query sir. I have read that Jupiter's

> > exalted position is upto 05 degrees in Cancer. Then isn't it in its

> > baala avastha? Does that mean though Jupiter is exalted and

> assuming

> > unafflicted too, yet Hamsa Maha Purusha yoga is not in full

> operation?

> >

> > Thank you once again sir,

> >

> > Blessings

> >

> > Renu

> > vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

> > <dakshinastrologer@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Renuji:

> > >

> > > Kendradhipathya dosha arises by mere ownership of kendras by

> > > benefics. It does not take into account the disposition of the

> > > benefic planets in question. It is based on the dictum that

> > malefics

> > > owning the kendra houses bestow good results while benefics get

> > > afflicted by ownership of kendra houses.

> > >

> > > Pancha Mahaa Purusha Yogaa's are based on both ownership or

> > > exaltation (the planetary dignity) of the "real planets" and also

> > > their disposition; i.e, the planet concerned should be strongly

> > > placed in a kendra house at the same time being in its own or

> > > exaltation houses. Thus, when Pancha Maha Purusha Yoga operates

> in

> > a

> > > horoscope, you should deem that the kendradhipathya dosha is not

> > > operational in the horoscope.

> > >

> > > One important point to note about Pancha Mahaa Purusha Yogas is

> > that

> > > the planet giving rise to the yoga should be well-placed within

> the

> > > sign of its ownership/ exaltation also, i.e, it should not be in

> > the

> > > early degrees or near the end of the sign in which case, its

> > avastha

> > > will not be strong (Baala or Vriddha avasthaas which are not

> > > promising for results). Another factor is that the planet should

> > be

> > > free from afflictions arising from conjuction or aspect of

> > malefics.

> > > Only if the planets are free from all blemishes and at the same

> > time

> > > satisfy the criteria for Pancha Mahaa purusha yoga, the actual

> good

> > > results will be felt. Here, Samudrika Lakshanaas (Physiognomy)

> > will

> > > be handy to see if the yoga is operational or not. All the maha

> > > purusha yogaas have some samudrika lakshanaas ascribed to them.

> > For

> > > a person in whose horoscopes, the yoga is manifest fully, the

> > > samudrika lakshanaas will be quite perceptible. If the

> appearance

> > of

> > > the person is not in conformity with the samudrika lakshana

> > described

> > > for the yoga, then you should consider that the yoga is not fully

> > > operational in the horoscope. In fact, I have had many persons

> > asking

> > > me why the Pancha Maha Purusha yogas in their horoscopes are not

> > > helping them with exalted status......The reason is that the yoga

> > is

> > > not manifest or is blemished due to evil associations!

> > >

> > > In short, a fully manifest pancha mahaa purusha yoga will cancel

> > the

> > > kendradhipathya dosha in a horoscope.

> > >

> > > Blessed be.

> > > Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear learned members,

> > > >

> > > > "Benefics, if they become owners of Kendras do not bestow good

> on

> > > men."

> > > >

> > > > Then on the other hand when "Jupiter, Venus & Mercury are in

> > > Kendras in

> > > > own house or exalted give Maha Purusha Yoga."

> > > >

> > > > So for example in a Vrushika Lagna or Aries Lagna native if

> natal

> > > Venus

> > > > is in the 7th house or for a Gemini native Jupiter is in the

> 7th

> > > or 10

> > > > th house etc. etc. what conclusion can one come upon since the

> > > above 2

> > > > rules bring contradictory results?

> > > >

> > > > Kindly explain.

> > > >

> > > > Thank you,

> > > >

> > > > Blessings

> > > >

> > > > Renuji

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Shri. Prafulla:

 

Yes...It is a point well made. A planet that does not get

directional strength is not productive in its yogas.

 

Blessed be.

Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

vedic astrology, "Prafulla Gang"

<ripra_solutions wrote:

>

> Sir

>

> Also, the directional strength has got to make the planet working

> towards yoga. if the planet lacks directional strength, it often

fails

> to deliver - irrespective of other strength.

>

> regards / Prafulla

>

> vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

> <dakshinastrologer@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Renuji:

> >

> > In this case, Jupiter in its deepest exaltation ( 5 degrees of

> > Cancer) will actually make the Hamsa yoga fully operational. The

> > same logic would go for Mars and Venus which get exalted in 28th

> > degree of Capricorn and 27th degree of Pisces

respectively....Though

> > they are in Vridda avastha, their being in the point of deep

> > exaltation would make them fully powerful to confer the Maha

yogaas.

> > I should have made this clarification in my earlier mail itself.

> >

> > I hope it is now clear.

> >

> > Blessed be.

> > Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> >

> > vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear respected Sir Dakshinamoorthji,

> > >

> > > Thank you very much for your lucid explanation. I do understand

the

> > > difference now. Just one query sir. I have read that Jupiter's

> > > exalted position is upto 05 degrees in Cancer. Then isn't it in

its

> > > baala avastha? Does that mean though Jupiter is exalted and

> > assuming

> > > unafflicted too, yet Hamsa Maha Purusha yoga is not in full

> > operation?

> > >

> > > Thank you once again sir,

> > >

> > > Blessings

> > >

> > > Renu

> > > vedic astrology, "dakshinastrologer"

> > > <dakshinastrologer@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Renuji:

> > > >

> > > > Kendradhipathya dosha arises by mere ownership of kendras by

> > > > benefics. It does not take into account the disposition of

the

> > > > benefic planets in question. It is based on the dictum that

> > > malefics

> > > > owning the kendra houses bestow good results while benefics

get

> > > > afflicted by ownership of kendra houses.

> > > >

> > > > Pancha Mahaa Purusha Yogaa's are based on both ownership or

> > > > exaltation (the planetary dignity) of the "real planets" and

also

> > > > their disposition; i.e, the planet concerned should be

strongly

> > > > placed in a kendra house at the same time being in its own or

> > > > exaltation houses. Thus, when Pancha Maha Purusha Yoga

operates

> > in

> > > a

> > > > horoscope, you should deem that the kendradhipathya dosha is

not

> > > > operational in the horoscope.

> > > >

> > > > One important point to note about Pancha Mahaa Purusha Yogas

is

> > > that

> > > > the planet giving rise to the yoga should be well-placed

within

> > the

> > > > sign of its ownership/ exaltation also, i.e, it should not be

in

> > > the

> > > > early degrees or near the end of the sign in which case, its

> > > avastha

> > > > will not be strong (Baala or Vriddha avasthaas which are not

> > > > promising for results). Another factor is that the planet

should

> > > be

> > > > free from afflictions arising from conjuction or aspect of

> > > malefics.

> > > > Only if the planets are free from all blemishes and at the

same

> > > time

> > > > satisfy the criteria for Pancha Mahaa purusha yoga, the

actual

> > good

> > > > results will be felt. Here, Samudrika Lakshanaas

(Physiognomy)

> > > will

> > > > be handy to see if the yoga is operational or not. All the

maha

> > > > purusha yogaas have some samudrika lakshanaas ascribed to

them.

> > > For

> > > > a person in whose horoscopes, the yoga is manifest fully, the

> > > > samudrika lakshanaas will be quite perceptible. If the

> > appearance

> > > of

> > > > the person is not in conformity with the samudrika lakshana

> > > described

> > > > for the yoga, then you should consider that the yoga is not

fully

> > > > operational in the horoscope. In fact, I have had many

persons

> > > asking

> > > > me why the Pancha Maha Purusha yogas in their horoscopes are

not

> > > > helping them with exalted status......The reason is that the

yoga

> > > is

> > > > not manifest or is blemished due to evil associations!

> > > >

> > > > In short, a fully manifest pancha mahaa purusha yoga will

cancel

> > > the

> > > > kendradhipathya dosha in a horoscope.

> > > >

> > > > Blessed be.

> > > > Pandit. R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology, "renunw" <renunw@>

wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear learned members,

> > > > >

> > > > > "Benefics, if they become owners of Kendras do not bestow

good

> > on

> > > > men."

> > > > >

> > > > > Then on the other hand when "Jupiter, Venus & Mercury are

in

> > > > Kendras in

> > > > > own house or exalted give Maha Purusha Yoga."

> > > > >

> > > > > So for example in a Vrushika Lagna or Aries Lagna native if

> > natal

> > > > Venus

> > > > > is in the 7th house or for a Gemini native Jupiter is in

the

> > 7th

> > > > or 10

> > > > > th house etc. etc. what conclusion can one come upon since

the

> > > > above 2

> > > > > rules bring contradictory results?

> > > > >

> > > > > Kindly explain.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thank you,

> > > > >

> > > > > Blessings

> > > > >

> > > > > Renuji

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>