Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

I asked you to prove following assumption:

 

If in 1966 Srila Prabhupada made himself recognized and accepted as the sole

diksa guru for ISKCON, then in 1966 he wanted to be the sole diksa guru for

ISKCON.

 

And you replied:

 

> I also do not have to prove he wanted to be what he made himself become.

 

Yes, you are right. You do not have to prove your claim. You can leave it

unproven. And I do not expect that you will ever prove it.

 

But probably you wanted to say that above assumption is true without having

to be proven or, in other words, that it is an axiom. Krishnakant recently

wrote that the axioms are the statements of Srila Prabhupada, since they are

self-evident truths.

 

So please quote Srila Prabhupada's statement saying that if a guru made

himself recognized and accepted as X, then he wanted to be X.

 

If you cannot present such a statement, then above assumption is not an

axiom, and you have to prove it or admit that it is unproven.

 

ys Ramakanta dasa