Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

definitions

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

> Are there sastric or "Prabhupada Said" definitions of "blasphemy" and

> "offense"?

 

The etymological development of the word aparadha is radhat arthat

aradhanat-apagatah, which means "to be distanced from worship".

 

Offenses commited at the lotus feet of Vaisnavas, the Devotees, distance one

from devotional service to the Supreme Lord. But in a higher sense it means

to be removed from the service of Radha. All divine service to Krsna is

being conducted under her direction. To offend her servitors is to make one

unfit for her divine service.

 

from "Heart of Krsna" by Srila Bhakti Promod Puri Goswami Maharaja

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"COM: (Bhakta) Didzis Melbiksis (Latvian BBT)" wrote:

 

> [Text 2981921 from COM]

>

> > Are there sastric or "Prabhupada Said" definitions of "blasphemy" and

> > "offense"?

>

> The etymological development of the word aparadha is radhat arthat

> aradhanat-apagatah, which means "to be distanced from worship".

>

> Offenses commited at the lotus feet of Vaisnavas, the Devotees, distance one

> from devotional service to the Supreme Lord. But in a higher sense it means

> to be removed from the service of Radha. All divine service to Krsna is

> being conducted under her direction. To offend her servitors is to make one

> unfit for her divine service.

>

> from "Heart of Krsna" by Srila Bhakti Promod Puri Goswami Maharaja

 

This is a nice description, but I am afraid if we begin introducing other

authorities, we will be watering down the focus of this conference which is

"Prabhupada said."

 

So, could we try to limit responses to "Prabhupada said"?

 

Thanks.

 

your servant,

 

Hare Krsna dasi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> This is a nice description, but I am afraid if we begin introducing other

> authorities, we will be watering down the focus of this conference which

> is "Prabhupada said."

>

> So, could we try to limit responses to "Prabhupada said"?

 

Excellent point!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 02 Feb 2000, Hare Krsna dasi wrote:

 

Referring to Bhakta Didzis' quotation,

> >

> > from "Heart of Krsna" by Srila Bhakti Promod Puri Goswami Maharaja

>

> This is a nice description, but I am afraid if we begin introducing other

> authorities, we will be watering down the focus of this conference which is

> "Prabhupada said."

>

> So, could we try to limit responses to "Prabhupada said"?

>

> Thanks.

 

I see two problems here. One is that the question was posted to two

conferences. Such cross-posting often causes problems such as this. In this

sense, then, the responsibility is at least partly Bhakti-vikasa Maharaj's.

Didzis admitted that he didn't notice that the "Prabhupaa Said" conference was

also a receiver, so it may partly be his responsibility. However, if we look

at Maharaj's question, he was asking for an authoritative definition, either

from the shastras or from Srila Prabhupada. If Didzis considers that B.P. Puri

Maharaj's books are based entirely on the authority of Sri Caitanya

Mahaprabhu, the Goswamis, acaryas, Srila Bhaktivinoda and Bhaktisiddhanta

Saraswati Thakuras, I don't see how there's any fault in his posting. Those

who objected could also have checked and found that the question was posted to

another conference besides "Prabhupada Said."

 

Babhru das

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...