Guest guest Posted October 15, 2000 Report Share Posted October 15, 2000 Dandavats, vaishnavas. Jaya Prabhupada! It's well known that Krishna is quite fond of butter, milk, yogurt, etc. He is even willing to dance for it, at the beck and call of simple village women, just like an ordinary child. This has been described in an old Brajabhasha poem as follows: sesa ganesa dinesa mahesa suresa hu jAhi nirantara gAvai jAhi anAdi ananta akhaNDa acheda abheda subeda batAvai | nArada se suka vyAsa raTai paci hAre ta-U puni pAra na pAvai tAhi ahIra kI chauhariyA chachiyA-bhari chAcha pai nAca nacAvai || "He whom Shesha-naga, Ganapati, Shiva, Surya, and Indra constantly glorify, He whom the best of the Vedas describe as 'beginningless,' 'unlimited,' 'unbroken,' 'impenetrable,' and 'nondual,' He whose glories are sung by Narada, Shukadeva, and Vyasa, but whose furthest extent remains beyond even them--that very Personality of Godhead, these daughters of the cowherds can force to dance in hopes of a spoonful of buttermilk!" Perhaps this song was composed on the basis on the following verse from the Shrimad Bhagavatam (10.11.7): gopIbhiH stobhito 'nRtyad bhagavAn bAlavat kvacit | udgAyati kvacin mugdhas tad-vazo dAru-yantravat || 7 || "The gopis would say, 'If You dance, my dear Krsna, then I shall give You half a sweetmeat.' By saying these words or by clapping their hands, all the gopis encouraged Krsna in different ways. At such times, although He was the supremely powerful Personality of Godhead, He would smile and dance according to their desire, as if He were a wooden doll in their hands. Sometimes He would sing very loudly, at their bidding. In this way, Krsna came completely under the control of the gopis." It is pure love that Krishna is so attached to, though of course buttermilk (like other auspicious offerings) may be our tangible manifestation of such love. He becomes completely controlled by it (tad-vazaH), and even forgets His own identity. There are many places throughout Shrila Prabhupada's books in which this principle is reiterated in various ways (cf. Bhagavatam, 1.8.31). Similarly, in Shrila Rupa Gosvami's anthology Padyavali (133), the same idea is found in the following beautiful verse: kvAnanaM kva nayanaM kva nAsikA kva zrutiH kva ca zikheti dezitaH | tatra tatra nihitAGguli-dalo ballavI-kulam anandayat prabhuH || 133 || "'Where's your face? Where are your eyes? Where's your nose? Where are your ears? Where is your shikha?' Instructed in this way by the cowherd ladies, the Lord put His lotus finger wherever they told Him to, and He thus delighted them." Krishna is unlimitedly greedy for this pure love; we all know from the Shvetashvataropanishad (6.8) and other sources that He factually has nothing to do except revel in it perpetually. The Mundaka (3.2.3) and Kathopanishads (1.2.23) repeatedly remind us that we cannot enter into these truths except through His Divine grace. But even if just we try to consider just what such love means to Krishna, and how much He is both attracted and attached to the diverse manifestations of His inexhaustible pleasure potency, we can reap tremendous benefit. Thus we may become more receptive to the Lord's Divine grace. Unfortunately, we are far less attached to Krishna than He is to His pure devotees. Nowadays, child abuse is a widespread problem, largely because so many people no longer have much character--mostly due to their prolonged immersion in the various aspects and processes of unprincipled sense gratification. It seems to me that our offensive chanting--in which we repeatedly call Krishna to us--but then ourselves go off to something (or someone) else--in effect simply teases the Lord, like offering milksweets to a hungry child but then witholding them. Considering how much Krishna craves pure devotion, is this not absolutely abusive? MDd Q. How important is Ekadasi for the followers of Caitanya Mahaprabhu? A. Ekadasi was very important to Caitanya Mahaprabhu. One day in his childhood he approached his mother and asked, "Mother, please do one thing for me?" She said, "Yes, Nimai, whatever you like." He said, "Please don't eat grains on Ekadasi." At that time in Bengal only widows were thought to have to follow Ekadasi and women who were married and had families and husbands, they didn't. Ekadasi was looked at as a punishment. If you're a bad person, then you have to fast on Ekadasi. They thought widows were unfortunate people, with bad karma, inauspicious. So if your life was inauspicious, only then did you need to follow Ekadasi. But Mahaprabhu said something quite different. So immediately, from that day on, Sacidevi began to observe Ekadasi. Later on, in Jagannatha Puri, the devotees of Mahaprabhu had a dilemma about observing Ekadasi. Because in Jagannath Puri there is so much prasad, 54 offerings daily and taking Jagannath prasad is very auspicious. So, if Ekadasi means fasting, how can we not honor the prasad of Lord Jagannatha? This question was put to Caitanya Mahaprabhu and he gave his opinion; "We shall observe Ekadasi and we shall honor Jagannath prasad. When Jagannath prasad comes, we will pay our dandavats to it. In this way, prasad will be honored and we will continue to observe the upavasa at the same time." So Mahaprabhu emphasized this point a great deal. Even raganuga bhaktas should observe Ekadasi. It is favorable, it is anukula for raganuga bhajan. We should not think that raganuga means we don't need to follow all of the regulations. Q. What is the principle behind Ekadasi? Upavasa means to fast. Vasa may mean to reside and upa means nearby. So upavasa means "to reside nearby". So the main principle of Ekadasi is to reside near the Lord. It is not about fasting but about coming closer to the Lord. This is the actual heart of the idea. In fact, every day we should come closer to the Lord but two days have been singled out to emphasize the point. So we can call it Hari's day and everyone will be told to do certain observances. But the purpose is to reside closer to the Lord, to come near to him. And when we do it we find it is nice, and then we may end up doing it every day. That is the real idea. In the Christian faith they make Sunday the Lord's Day. Every day actually is the Lord's day, but they select one day so that at least on that one day everyone will observe. So this is the principle, to come near to the Lord. Our Ekadasi observance should revolve around that. In other words, if fasting is only making me go to sleep, if fasting is only making me proud, what is the value of that? Will I be brought nearer to the Lord by that? Q. Are there ever any exceptions? On one occasion a disciple of Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur had to travel for preaching on Ekadasi. It was important for the mission that he preach, and for traveling you have to eat grains - especially if you're Bengali, you have to have some rice. So they ate rice and went preaching on Ekadasi. This is mentioned in Hari Bhakti Vilasa, if sad-guru says break Ekadasi, then you can break it. In the preaching mission of Caitanya Mahaprabhu we should position ourselves as assistants to a real preacher. We should follow very carefully. But if sad guru says "take grains on Ekadasi" then for the higher purpose of preaching we can do that, as Sarasvati Thakur showed. We have to become acquainted with the principle of Ekadasi, as we must with all the devotional practices. Otherwise it is just niyamagraha. We follow the rules but don't know the meaning. That will be counterproductive and a cause of going down. We should have this kind of sensibility and understand the principle. We should be saragrahi Vaisnavas and not baragrahi Vaisnavas who simply carry around a burden of so much form that the substance is obscured. This is a gostyanandi line we are coming in, and it is all about adjusting the details for delivering the principle. We have to have some dynamic thinking if we are to preach. Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur was prepared to serve even meat if this meant Westerners would come to Mayapur to hear about Caitanya Mahaprabhu. His own disciples were shocked. He told them, "You have to have Vaikuntha vritti." This means like Vaikuntha in the mind, where anything can be adjusted from the Vaikuntha perspective, and all things are possible. He was no ordinary devotee preacher. We should aspire to come under the auspices of such a person. And we cannot imitate such a preacher of course. But we should know who it is we are connected with, and what an extraordinary devotee Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur was, and how great were his followers. We must keep this line of the Gaudiya Sarasvata sampradaya alive with real preaching through understanding the essence of the devotional principles. Q. What is the significance of the moon and Ekadasi? In the Bhagavad-gita Krsna says, "I am the light of the sun and the moon." There is another way of thinking about this, looking at it from another direction. "In this world I am the light. The light of the sun and moon cannot reveal me, but at the same time in whatever light there is, I am there." If we think of the sun and moon in this way, it will shed light on the nature of Krsna's position and take us to him. Krsna says, "I become the moon and by that I nourish the vegetables." The moon is said to have some position in influencing the juices. The tides of the ocean, for example, are determined by the phases of the moon. And our human body is constituted primarily of water. So at the time of Ekadasi, the water in the body rises up by the influence of the moon and puts pressure on the senses and increases our tendency to enjoy. From this perspective it seems to be inauspicious because we are pushed toward sense gratification which is not drawing us nearer to the Lord but away. So by fasting, the pressure on the senses goes down and we will not be pushed away from the Lord by the influence of that phase of the moon. So from the point of view of the sadhaka, it may seem that Ekadasi is inauspicious. But Prabhupada said, "Ekadasi is most auspicious," did he not? "It is not fasting, it is feasting." So for the siddha, who dwells in the aprakrta conception of the Absolute, Krsna is not God, Krsna appears to be like one of us. Mother Yasoda is not thinking, "Krsna is the Supreme Godhead." The cowherds and the gopis are not thinking like this. They are thinking along these lines, "My son, my friend, my lover." They are thinking that Krsna is human like them. So on Ekadasi they think, "Pressure is there on Krsna's senses to enjoy more. So we can offer him more on this day, more prasad we can offer. We can satisfy his senses more. Although we are already giving him everything, by the grace of this phase of the moon, we can serve even more." So these devotees see Ekadasi as increasing their service. In this way Ekadasi is most auspicious. It is feasting for the Lord and not fasting at all. So we should try to come to this aprakrta conception of Krsna. This is our ideal. First we teach Krsna is the Supreme God, but we hope in the future people will forget that. At one stage we are preaching Krsna is the Supreme, but only to get people to the stage where they will think he is their friend only, their lover. This is our ideal. So ours is a very funny religion - turning the Veda upside down. But this is Vrindavan, this is Goloka. And this is how we should try to understand Ekadasi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.