Guest guest Posted January 7, 2002 Report Share Posted January 7, 2002 > > > We are not interested in vishnu-bhakti nor > > > do we pray to tulasi: kripa kori koro tare vaikuntha dhama basi, "O > > > tulasi devi please give me residence in Vaikuntha." > > > > > that's a very good point. Isvara Prabhu wrote: > This statement is made purely out of ignorance due to tattva-bhram. If you > are not interested in visnu-bhakti, then what are you interested in? > Maya-bhakti? Why prematurely making a difference between visnu-bhakti and > krishna-bhakti. I thought we are trying to be Vaisnavas. Vaisnava means > devotees of Visnu. I think you must have missed my original text. Here is an excerpt: (As given below) Srila Rupa Goswami describes that in terms of tattva there is no difference between Sri Isa, Lord Narayan and Krishna. However in terms of rasa, Krishna is superior and in our prayers we do often make a distinction between the two. We are not interested in vishnu-bhakti nor do we pray to tulasi: kripa kori koro tare vaikuntha dhama basi, "O tulasi devi please give me residence in Vaikuntha." siddhAntatastvabhede 'pi ZrIZa-kRSNa-svarUpayoH rasenotkRSyate kRSNa-rUpameSA rasasthitih Sri Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu 1.2.59 Das anudas, Madhavananda Das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.