Guest guest Posted March 21, 1999 Report Share Posted March 21, 1999 On 19 Mar 1999, Payonidhi Dasa wrote: > Advocating that the jiva does not fall from Vaikuntha is against GBC rules and > regulations,as such ideas are based on insufficient understanding of > sastra. That is yet to be proven. Maybe this should not be allowed to continue to discuss this here since > the advocaters of such ignorance,just fill up page after page,with no onter > idea that to pollute the devotees away from the actual situation. I hope no one has any doubts on my original assertion that ISKCON devotees are discouraged from airing doubts. > his pastimes.This persons here don't even want to identifie his devotee > name???I suggest that this issue about the jiva be disallowed > right here before we get more of this mayavadi ideas in here. Mayavadi ideas... interesting. Well the Sri Vaishnavas (the followers of Sri Raamaanuja) hold to the no-fall theory. Are they mayavadis? Would you like to go to them and tell they are mayavadis for not believing in fall-vaada? > YS > Payonidhi das > They don't want to learn and rectifie but to challenge the GBC and Srila > Prabhupada's presenting the proper siddhanta on the jiva issue. I think it's truly sad that the mentality of some ISKCON devotees has been so affected by some critics of the GBC that they perceive any sort of discussion as a challenge to GBC authority. Anyway, I fail to see how someone can accuse someone else of not wanting to learn, when that same person is the one trying to stop the discussion. regards, -- K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.