So-called Proof of Bipin Bihari Goswami's position

[Guest guest]

> You have attempted to supply for the benefit of the learned members of

> these conferences some supposed "historical evidences" which you claim

> "prove the actual position of Bipin Bihari Goswami". Ajamila Prabhu has

> commented on your text by stating that the information you have supplied

> was "well-researched" and "very useful". I respectfully submit that your

> information is not at all well-researched, and is not only of questionable

> usefulness but also misleading and possibly dangerous.

 

Interestinger and interestinger. Thanks for your comments Bhakta

Rupa prabhu. This discussion is indeed taking some twists and turns. On the

whole I still go with the contention that Bipin Bihari Goswami fell out of

favor with Bhaktivinoda Thakur because that is the indication from Srila

Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur himself, and his followers. But its nice to

hear all the nuances.

 

Your humble servant,

Hari-sauri dasa

[Guest guest]

> [Text 2412513 from COM]

>

> > Is there any written indication from Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati or it

> > comes in oral tradition?

>

> It seems to be mainly oral, but just the fact that BBG was not

> included in the listing of the parampara given to us by SBSST shows he was

> not held in the kind of esteem that Jagannath das Babaji even though he was

> the diksa guru of BVT.

>

> Your humble servant,

> Hari-sauri dasa

Dear Prabhus,

I normally do not like to disagree with Hari-sauri prabhu. But in

this case I cannot uphold his line of reasoning.

The fact that Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur did not list

does not indicate anything pro or con in this case. All that is

indicated is that is he not listed.

It would seem best to leave it at that.

Your servant,

Ramiya dasa