Guest guest Posted July 26, 1999 Report Share Posted July 26, 1999 > Coming to the sankirtana movement is not exactly the same as appearing in > the pastimes of Lord Chaitanya. In the case of the latter, the devotees > intrinsic position is probably such an associate. However, a soul who is > intrinsically from Vaikuntha, and comes into contact with the sankirtana > movement, would only get back that intrinsic nature Then why Murari Gupta who is none other than Hanuman is present also in Lord Caitanya's pastimes in Navadvipa. He is also Lord Caitanya's eternal associate so you can't say that he came only in Lord Caitanya's bhauma lila. He is also present in the eternal Navadvipa of Goloka. At the same time he is also present in the eteranl Ayodhya dhama of Vaikuntha. Ofcourse in Navadvipa, he is relishing his inner love for Lord Ramachandra by participating in the hari-nama-sankirtana of Lord Caitanya. That is why Prabhupada said that the Rama in the maha-mantra can mean Balarama, Ramachandra, Parsurama or Radhika Ramana as per one's constitutional position. But the fact remains that he has got entry into Goloka by participating in the hari-nama-sankirtana of Lord Caitanya. So Lord Caitanya's hari-nama-sankirtan takes us to Goloka in any case. You cannot deny this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.