Allegations Made Against H.H. Narayana Maharaja

[Guest guest]

> On 27 Sep 1999, Mundita Mastaka wrote:

> > Rather, his

> > presentation

> > was directly from Srila Baladeva Vidyabhusana's commentary on Sri

> > Isopanisad.

>

> First, I've heard this comment before, but have never seen it backed up.

> How about providing the Sanskrit text for Srila Baladeva's Isopanisad

> commentary? Note that it is _not_ sufficient to show his comments on the

> "oM pUrNam" verse, since that verse also appears in a different context in

> another Upanishad (bRhadAranyaka). In fact, when it appears in the

> bRhadAranyaka, Srila Prabhupada himself takes the verse as referring to

> the avatAras of the Lord (see CC Adi, 7th or 8th chapter). This proves

> that the verse (and its explanation) needs to be seen in its full context.

 

I thought to add that Madhvacarya does not comment on the Iso Invocation, at

least not in the comentary on the Upanisad.

 

He comments on the verse in Brihadaranyaka upanisad and Prabhupada seem to

follow his comentary in the CC.

 

I would also like to see Baladeva's bhasya.

 

ys ARd