samskaras not for vaisyas?

[Guest guest]

Hare krsna,

please accept my humble obeisances.

All glories to srila Prabhupada.

 

in SB 10.8.7. purp. it is written:

.... It may be argued that although Gargamuni was priest of Yadu dynasty,

Nanda Maharaja also belonged to that dynasty. Nanda maharaja, however, was

not acting as a ksatriya. Therefore Gargamuni said: "If i act as your

priest, this will confirm that Krsna is the son of devaki."

 

Does is mean that samskaras are not meant for vaysyas or what is the logic

behind gargamuni's argument?

Thank you

y.s.Jatila d.d.