Guest guest Posted March 25, 2003 Report Share Posted March 25, 2003 Digest 55, March 25, 2003 Answers by His Holiness Romapada Swami Maharaja *** You are welcome to send in your questions to HH Romapada Swami at iskcondc (AT) prastha (DOT) com with the word "Question" in the subject. *** Karma ****** Q.1) Is it a sin to kill a living entity like ant, mosquito, cockroach or spider etc? They harm human beings by some means and because of this only one would kill them. It is written in purport of BG 14.16 that one should not kill any living entity. But, microorganisms (bacteria, virus) are always killed by us and plants are also living entities. While I accept that one should not kill animals for eating, but what about plants and bacteria and vermins? Does that incur sin? Please clarify. Answer: Yes, killing any living entity knowingly, or even unknowingly, incurs sinful reactions. The Supreme Lord is the supreme Father of all beings and every living entity has the right to live in this world, just as we humans do. We do not have the right, because of being in a superior life form, to needlessly take the life of or even cause pain to any other living entity; rather as human beings we are expected to show compassion to these innocent creatures. In fact, Srimad Bhagavatam describes that it is the duty of a grihastha (householder) to protect and maintain even the insects, lizards and other lower life forms as if they were one's own children, what to speak of killing them! (Please refer SB 7.14.9) We also hear of great saintly persons taking the trouble to not kill even some insignificant ants crossing their path. It is the nature of a sadhu to be compassionate and not harm anyone even if it meant bearing personal inconvenience; and if there is an option to get rid of a troublesome living entity without killing that should be preferred. Only when a living entity poses a dangerous threat, then they may be killed. For instance, scriptures sanction the killing of a snake or scorpion because these living entities are very envious and will thus be relieved of their sinful bodies. As you have indicated, it is impossible for an embodied living entity in the material world to exist without unavoidably inflicting some difficulty upon other embodied living entities. Just by one's very existence one kills many micro-organisms even while harmlessly walking or just by breathing. Does this mean that we should opt instead to go out of existence so as to escape these sins, as some impersonlist schools propose? No. The solution is to purify our existence. These unavoidable sinful reactions can be counteracted only by dedicating our lives unto God's service and performing yajna (such as sankirtana yajna, chanting the Lord's Holy Names). If one's very existence is completey dedicated to the Lord, and one is not envious towards any living entity but a well-wisher of all, then whatever one does becomes beneficial even to the unseen microorganisms. You cited the example of killing plants for food. Such an activity also incurs sin, albeit relatively less sinful compared to killing of animals. But when a devotee prepares food items and cooks for Krishna, offers the food to the Lord and then partakes the prasadam, there is no sin incured for the devotees. Conversely, the plants derive great spiritual benefit because of being offered to the Lord's in devotion, and are thus promoted to higher forms of life than would have been the case had natural death taken place instead. Forms of God ************ Q.2) Who is Hyagriva avatar? Are there more than one? Answer: There is not much detail about the Hayagriva Avatara in the Bhagavatam. He killed Madhu and Kaitabha when they tried to steal the Vedas from Brahma. The story is told differently in different Puranas. In the Matsya Purana Madhu and Kaitabha confront Brahma and tell him that they are supreme and that they would cover the entire universe with passion and ignorance. Brahma replies that Visnu would kill them. Visnu then just grabs them by extending His arms right from the place on His couch, has a short talk with them and then squeezes them to death. In the Matsya this Visnu form is not described as Hayagriva. The Bhagavatam, however, mentions Hayagriva or Hayasirsa at least twice in connection with the killing of Madhu and Kaitabha. One recension of the Ramayana tells that Madhu and Kaitabha were born from the ear-wax of Maha-Visnu. While the Bhagavatam does not mention the killing of Madhu and Kaitabha in connection with Hayagriva described in SB 2.7.11, this is nevertheless the passage that Rupa Gosvami chose for his description of the Hayagriva Avatara in his Laghubhagavatamrta: "He (Hayagraiva), having appeared from the sacrificial fire, killed the two Danavas Madhu and Kaitabha. Thereafter He returned the Vedas to the lord of the goddess of speech (Vagisvari)." There seems to be only one Hayagriva Avatara. ------- x ------------- x ---------- x ----------- x ---------- x ---------- x ---------- x ----------- ----- Festivals over the next week ------ Mar 25 2003, Tuesday Appearance Sri Srivasa Pandita Mar 28 2003, Friday Ekadasi Papamocani (Break fast 05:58-09:17) (Fast) Mar 29 2003, Saturday Disappearance Sri Govinda Ghosh *** NOTE: All times are for Washington D.C, USA, EST *** For festival information for your city please go to http://www.iskcondc.org and click on 'Calendar' - --------------------- ** A brief biography of His Holiness Romapada Swami available at :http://www.prastha.com/cgi-bin/uncgi/renderphilo.pl?ndx=2 ** This and all previous digests are available on the internet, sorted by topics and date. ** They can be accessed at: http://www.iskcondc.org -> Philosophy -> Inquiries into the Absolute You can also directly link to our Philosophy website by add the following URL to you website: http://www.prastha.com/cgi-bin/uncgi/renderphilo.pl - ---------------------------- This Email has been sent to you by the ISKCON temple of Washington D.C. Our contacts are: Email : iskcondc (AT) prastha (DOT) com Web Address : http://www.iskcondc.org Postal: 10310 Oaklyn Drive, Potomac, MD 20854 In order to be removed from this mailing list please reply with the word REMOVE in the Subject. - ------------------------- Please note that under Bill 1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress this letter cannot be considered "SPAM" as long as the posting includes: 1) Contact information 2) A "REMOVE" device. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.