Matajis, law of karma and fundamentalism.

[Guest guest]

> The point is, this (women) topic is a very difficult topic to understand,

> you cannot see everything black and white.

 

Yes, the man-women topic appears to be pretty hard to understand. We

devotees should have an advantage, since we know the science of the

spirit soul, and the subtle body, but are we using our advantage?

I have read even feminists who think that women and men qualities

are created by the parents. That men and women are born "equal".

At least we, as devotees, know that is not a fact. That the difference

is there from the first breath.

 

> Just consider this: everything in the material world in dualistic:

> Harmonisation, not manipulation, is the key to succeed, that means, both,

> man and women are of the same importants, but they are playing a different

> role.

 

I think that is a very important point. And that there is no way we can

create

a "better" society, unless we can attain that harmony between the sexes.

 

>

> When there is to much focus on man´s power (which is the case since 5000

> years), there will be problems. When women´s energies are taking charge,

> there will be also problems, the best in everything, whatever it may be,

> is balance. (harmony)

 

Also an important point. The western society is very top heavy in male

dominance. But as like time want to correct that, the western women are

getting more and more strong and independent, as time is passing,

and is chipping away from the male dominance piece by piece. Maybe

that will turn over to a completely female dominated society instead,

which as you say probably will not be so good either.

 

>

> Women are generaly more loving, caring, healing, and expert matajis are

> also better than man in transforming negative energies (in conflicts for

> example) We are living in the age of quarrel. Kali is therefore very eager

> to suppress the energies of women, and if one lady nethertheless gets some

> power, Kali manipulates her by telling her, that she has to act like a

> man. Therefore, women should develope those specific qualities, where they

> can become more expert than man (for Krsnas service), they should not

> immitate the foolish qualities of man.(politics etc.), but they should

> develope those specific positive qualities of women.

> (mentioned above).

 

The problem is that the men have put out guards against women.

If a women is to get entrance into the "man's world" of power-play,

she has to follow the rules of men, and adopt male mannerism. She

even has to dress in a masculine way to get by. The typical

business-women look. I don't think it is fair to blame women from

taking on male mannerism. That is the men's fault, not the womens.