Can we at least be truthful?

[Guest guest]

> In certain cases, I personally think that to do something "unethical" to

> expose a conspiracy, is completely bona fide. I don't think that

> Mahanidhi's "crime" is comparable to the disaster which could have come

> about if the GHQ conspiracy had "succeeded". If someone should be removed

> from COM, I would say that it should be those who planned the conspiracy,

> not the one who revealed the conspiracy.

 

So in your mind, the "completely bona-fide" method is to splatter it on VNN?

Isn't there a line of authority within ISKCON itself for Mahanidhi dasa and

company to report to if he had felt aggrieved? Seems like this is the crux

of the whole problem.

 

> After all, the conferance was shut down when it was exposed; shows to some

> degree that it was not really bona fide, or what?

 

Shutdown? I don't think you are correct here. It is only to be expected that

the discussion has moved elsewhere. Who would seriously continue it on COM

after the leak? BTW, one conference is still there on COM, but still this is

not the method of judging bona-fide one way or other.

 

> I hope you did not mean it serious when you say that Mahanidhi should be

> strung up and hanged.

> Ys

> Jkd

 

Seriously, you can't be serious with people who see no wrong in allowing a

self-confessed COM 'criminal' to lurk freely. If this is the case, then the

rules should not be binding on the other side as well. So your earlier call

for an apology is irrelevant.

 

Your servant,

Goloka Candra dasa