Can we at least be truthful?

[Guest guest]

> > In certain cases, I personally think that to do something "unethical" to

> > expose a conspiracy, is completely bona fide. I don't think that

> > Mahanidhi's "crime" is comparable to the disaster which could have come

> > about if the GHQ conspiracy had "succeeded". If someone should be

> > removed from COM, I would say that it should be those who planned the

> > conspiracy, not the one who revealed the conspiracy.

>

> So in your mind, the "completely bona-fide" method is to splatter it on

> VNN? Isn't there a line of authority within ISKCON itself for Mahanidhi

> dasa and company to report to if he had felt aggrieved? Seems like this is

> the crux of the whole problem.

 

I would say that it was like leaking a conspiracy to the media instead of

the government. When that happens, the government will surely do something.

If it is only reported to the government, who knows? I see this as involving

the "ground-level devotees" in an issue which concerns far more people than

the leaders of our movement.

 

> > I hope you did not mean it serious when you say that Mahanidhi should be

> > strung up and hanged.

 

> Seriously, you can't be serious with people who see no wrong in allowing a

> self-confessed COM 'criminal' to lurk freely. If this is the case, then

> the rules should not be binding on the other side as well. So your earlier

> call for an apology is irrelevant.

 

I don't see the conection between the not kicking out Mahanidhi from COM and

the not apologizing to the IWC for the repeated accusations.

 

Anyway, noone can force you to do one thing or the other.

 

Ys

Jkd