See the world through the eyes of the soul?

[Guest guest]

> I reacted on, and that is what I call VERY daring. Do you really think

> that you are steadily above the platform where you identify yourself with

> your body?

I have myself been long times and many times as a child at hospital as a

patient and suffered terrible pains--so that surely has *decreased* my

identification as a body, but surely not lifted me above the bodily

platform. I have not been living a safe life in a temple. I stand behind

what I have written and if you read carefully what I have written then you

maybe can understand me and my situation better.

 

Have you in practice noticed that I would be a proud, buffed-up predenter?

 

> If you really are on that level, you are far from a fallen servant any

> more, and you are far from being one of the lowest beings in the material

> world.

To learn and realize ONE little thing is not to learn everything and realize

the WHOLE Vedic knowledge. I didn't say I was on the platform of soul, I

wished to clarify that if I *at my work* wouldn't HANDLE and DEAL with the

other living (and often suffering creatures) AS SOULS (of course

understanding their special needs depending on their bodily form) then I

would become crazy or kicked out--or then I should think that they are just

material machines as the others do.

 

> (Most of the devotees in ISKCON are probably more advanced than me, but

> that does not mean that very many are above the platform of identifying

> themselves with the body. A Prabhupada disciple who was seriously

When I said "to see the world through the eyes of the soul" I didn't mean

that Bhakta M. should immedeately lift himself to the highest platform.

I wished he would give up these distinctions and sweeping definitions of

real macho men and real feminine women and their duties as innate definitive

principles in this awful age of Kali-yuga.