Guest guest Posted May 3, 1999 Report Share Posted May 3, 1999 "WWW: Janesvara (Dasa) ACBSP (Syracuse - USA)" wrote: > [Text 2284927 from COM] > > On 03 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > > > It is the duty of the > > Vaisya to protect the cow not to make money from the milk. > > What did Maharaj Nanda do with all his millions of gallons of milk a day? How > did he become so opulent? Is trade different than "making money"? The description of his opulences were that he had a lot of milk products. Also, money itself is not Vedic. It was all barter system. Also, it was a different yuga. they were nomads who traveled when they needed more land. That abundance of land doesn't exist now. Also , they lived in a society where noone was slaughtering cows, or using oil, so the economic playing field was level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 1999 Report Share Posted May 3, 1999 "WWW: Janesvara (Dasa) ACBSP (Syracuse - USA)" wrote: > [Text 2284927 from COM] > > On 03 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > > > It is the duty of the > > Vaisya to protect the cow not to make money from the milk. > > What did Maharaj Nanda do with all his millions of gallons of milk a day? How > did he become so opulent? Is trade different than "making money"? The description of his opulences were that he had a lot of milk products. Also, money itself is not Vedic. It was all barter system. Also, it was a different yuga. they were nomads who traveled when they needed more land. That abundance of land doesn't exist now. Also , they lived in a society where noone was slaughtering cows, or using oil, so the economic playing field was level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 1999 Report Share Posted May 3, 1999 On 03 May 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote: > "WWW: Janesvara (Dasa) ACBSP (Syracuse - USA)" wrote: > > What did Maharaj Nanda do with all his millions of gallons of milk a day? How > > did he become so opulent? Is trade different than "making money"? > The description of his opulences were that he had a lot of milk products. That is not true or at least fully accurate. In Krsna book there is descriptions of Yasoda's and Nanda's extreme wealth in jewels, jewelry, gold, silver, silks, opulent foods and spices (obviously from other parts of the world/Bharatavarsha), marble, . He must also have had immense cow-protection/bull management assets, i.e., yokes, carts, milk pails/containers, etc. He had a million cows. How many bulls? He paid some form of reasonable wages to thousands of cowherds/milkers/manurehandlers/milk shippers/farm workers, etc. > Also, money itself is not Vedic. It was all barter system. Gold coins were certainly used. Jewels were also used. What's the difference? The goods produced in Vrindavana were not the only goods they used. They bought with gold coins/jewels things like silk, marble, coral, silver, etc. Krsna gave millions in gold coins and jewels to the simple and humble Sudama brahmana. Why are we somehow against this? Dvaraka, Indraprastha, Krsna and the Pandavas were extremely opulent with millions of dollars in gold coins and jewels. When you have a billion people in the city of Dvaraka you cetainly have immense needs for importing goods and services which were purchased with currency in whatever form. Millions of gallons of milk had to be shipped into Dvaraka everyday along with millions of pounds of food, etc. They had highways and skyscrapers as described in Krsna book. Obviously we are not going to recreate Dvaraka - that is not the point at all and we need not get lost in that train of thought ("That was then, this is now"). My opinion is devotees can have opulence, money, jewels, etc. and still perform devotional service perfectly. Opulence is a QUALITY of Krsna. Greed, lust (including profit, adoration and distinction) and anger are the problem. Simple living is not the cure-all for those diseases - devotional service is. There are plenty of "self-sufficient" rural inhabitants who suffer from the above three diseases, too. I love simple living and farms and woods and country life too, but without bhakti it is just as material as the city. I would much prefer to live in Dvaraka as a devotee (or any city) than in the country in maya. There are always adjustments to be made in regards to yugas. In my opinion, if anything, in Kali-yuga we should learn to accept some of the contamination which we inherited when our unfortunate birth, due to our karma/fault, put us here and use it constructively for Krsna's service. We are not going to make it Satya-yuga. We are not against technology. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 1999 Report Share Posted May 3, 1999 On 03 May 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote: > "WWW: Janesvara (Dasa) ACBSP (Syracuse - USA)" wrote: > > What did Maharaj Nanda do with all his millions of gallons of milk a day? How > > did he become so opulent? Is trade different than "making money"? > The description of his opulences were that he had a lot of milk products. That is not true or at least fully accurate. In Krsna book there is descriptions of Yasoda's and Nanda's extreme wealth in jewels, jewelry, gold, silver, silks, opulent foods and spices (obviously from other parts of the world/Bharatavarsha), marble, . He must also have had immense cow-protection/bull management assets, i.e., yokes, carts, milk pails/containers, etc. He had a million cows. How many bulls? He paid some form of reasonable wages to thousands of cowherds/milkers/manurehandlers/milk shippers/farm workers, etc. > Also, money itself is not Vedic. It was all barter system. Gold coins were certainly used. Jewels were also used. What's the difference? The goods produced in Vrindavana were not the only goods they used. They bought with gold coins/jewels things like silk, marble, coral, silver, etc. Krsna gave millions in gold coins and jewels to the simple and humble Sudama brahmana. Why are we somehow against this? Dvaraka, Indraprastha, Krsna and the Pandavas were extremely opulent with millions of dollars in gold coins and jewels. When you have a billion people in the city of Dvaraka you cetainly have immense needs for importing goods and services which were purchased with currency in whatever form. Millions of gallons of milk had to be shipped into Dvaraka everyday along with millions of pounds of food, etc. They had highways and skyscrapers as described in Krsna book. Obviously we are not going to recreate Dvaraka - that is not the point at all and we need not get lost in that train of thought ("That was then, this is now"). My opinion is devotees can have opulence, money, jewels, etc. and still perform devotional service perfectly. Opulence is a QUALITY of Krsna. Greed, lust (including profit, adoration and distinction) and anger are the problem. Simple living is not the cure-all for those diseases - devotional service is. There are plenty of "self-sufficient" rural inhabitants who suffer from the above three diseases, too. I love simple living and farms and woods and country life too, but without bhakti it is just as material as the city. I would much prefer to live in Dvaraka as a devotee (or any city) than in the country in maya. There are always adjustments to be made in regards to yugas. In my opinion, if anything, in Kali-yuga we should learn to accept some of the contamination which we inherited when our unfortunate birth, due to our karma/fault, put us here and use it constructively for Krsna's service. We are not going to make it Satya-yuga. We are not against technology. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 1999 Report Share Posted May 3, 1999 "WWW: Janesvara (Dasa) ACBSP (Syracuse - USA)" wrote: > [Text 2286637 from COM] > > On 03 May 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote: > > > > "WWW: Janesvara (Dasa) ACBSP (Syracuse - USA)" wrote: > > > > What did Maharaj Nanda do with all his millions of gallons of milk a day? > How > > > did he become so opulent? Is trade different than "making money"? > > > > The description of his opulences were that he had a lot of milk products. > > That is not true or at least fully accurate. In Krsna book there is > descriptions of Yasoda's and Nanda's extreme wealth in jewels, jewelry, gold, > silver, silks, opulent foods and spices (obviously from other parts of the > world/Bharatavarsha), marble, . He must also have had immense > cow-protection/bull management assets, i.e., yokes, carts, milk > pails/containers, etc. He had a million cows. How many bulls? He paid some > form of reasonable wages to thousands of cowherds/milkers/manurehandlers/milk > shippers/farm workers, etc. > BArtered for with milk products, wages paid in kind. > > > > Also, money itself is not Vedic. It was all barter system. > > Gold coins were certainly used I must have missed that reference. In any case, gold has intrinsic value, unlike money. > . Jewels were also used. What's the difference? With jewels I can keep my wife happy, decorate the Deities , do healing. Jewels have intrinsic value. > > The goods produced in Vrindavana were not the only goods they used. They > bought with gold coins/jewels things like silk, marble, coral, silver, etc. > Krsna gave millions in gold coins and jewels to the simple and humble Sudama > brahmana. Why are we somehow against this? Not against it. I'm not against paper money. Just you used Nanda Maharajah as an example, and I was pointing out how he lived in a different set of circumstances where money wasn't used. Of if we count gold coins, at least paper money wasn't used. Paper money creates ability to artifically concentrate wealth. Even a gold-standard exchange and currency is bad. Gold-standard currency is based on falsehood because the currency is not on a par with the reserved gold. The basic principle is falsity because currency notes are issued in value beyond that of the actual reserved gold. This artificial inflation of currency by the authorities encourages prostitution of the state economy. The price of commodities becomes artificially inflated because of bad money, or artificial currency notes. Bad money drives away good money. Instead of paper currency, actual gold coins should be used for exchange, and this will stop prostitution of gold. Gold ornaments for women may be allowed by control, not by quality, but by quantity. This will discourage lust, envy and enmity. When there is actual gold currency in the form of coins, the influence of gold in producing falsity, prostitution, etc., will automatically cease. There will be no need of an anticorruption ministry for another term of prostitution and falsity of purpose. >>> Ref. VedaBase => SB 1.17.39 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 1999 Report Share Posted May 3, 1999 "WWW: Janesvara (Dasa) ACBSP (Syracuse - USA)" wrote: > [Text 2286637 from COM] > > On 03 May 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote: > > > > "WWW: Janesvara (Dasa) ACBSP (Syracuse - USA)" wrote: > > > > What did Maharaj Nanda do with all his millions of gallons of milk a day? > How > > > did he become so opulent? Is trade different than "making money"? > > > > The description of his opulences were that he had a lot of milk products. > > That is not true or at least fully accurate. In Krsna book there is > descriptions of Yasoda's and Nanda's extreme wealth in jewels, jewelry, gold, > silver, silks, opulent foods and spices (obviously from other parts of the > world/Bharatavarsha), marble, . He must also have had immense > cow-protection/bull management assets, i.e., yokes, carts, milk > pails/containers, etc. He had a million cows. How many bulls? He paid some > form of reasonable wages to thousands of cowherds/milkers/manurehandlers/milk > shippers/farm workers, etc. > BArtered for with milk products, wages paid in kind. > > > > Also, money itself is not Vedic. It was all barter system. > > Gold coins were certainly used I must have missed that reference. In any case, gold has intrinsic value, unlike money. > . Jewels were also used. What's the difference? With jewels I can keep my wife happy, decorate the Deities , do healing. Jewels have intrinsic value. > > The goods produced in Vrindavana were not the only goods they used. They > bought with gold coins/jewels things like silk, marble, coral, silver, etc. > Krsna gave millions in gold coins and jewels to the simple and humble Sudama > brahmana. Why are we somehow against this? Not against it. I'm not against paper money. Just you used Nanda Maharajah as an example, and I was pointing out how he lived in a different set of circumstances where money wasn't used. Of if we count gold coins, at least paper money wasn't used. Paper money creates ability to artifically concentrate wealth. Even a gold-standard exchange and currency is bad. Gold-standard currency is based on falsehood because the currency is not on a par with the reserved gold. The basic principle is falsity because currency notes are issued in value beyond that of the actual reserved gold. This artificial inflation of currency by the authorities encourages prostitution of the state economy. The price of commodities becomes artificially inflated because of bad money, or artificial currency notes. Bad money drives away good money. Instead of paper currency, actual gold coins should be used for exchange, and this will stop prostitution of gold. Gold ornaments for women may be allowed by control, not by quality, but by quantity. This will discourage lust, envy and enmity. When there is actual gold currency in the form of coins, the influence of gold in producing falsity, prostitution, etc., will automatically cease. There will be no need of an anticorruption ministry for another term of prostitution and falsity of purpose. >>> Ref. VedaBase => SB 1.17.39 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 1999 Report Share Posted May 3, 1999 On 02 May 1999, Niscala dd wrote: > Yes, technology can be used for preaching Krsna consciousness- e.g. printing books, but it is NOT preaching for our agriculture to be dependent on it Comment: Precisely, we always seem to think that because we have been given permission to use something that it is alright to use it however we want. If it is not directly used for preaching it is not essential and therefore we should not be dependent upon it. “Whatever is available easily we can use. There is no objection to using electricity. But we should not be dependent upon it.” Letter to Nityananda dated 16th March, 1977. Ys, Rohita dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 1999 Report Share Posted May 3, 1999 On 02 May 1999, Niscala dd wrote: > Yes, technology can be used for preaching Krsna consciousness- e.g. printing books, but it is NOT preaching for our agriculture to be dependent on it Comment: Precisely, we always seem to think that because we have been given permission to use something that it is alright to use it however we want. If it is not directly used for preaching it is not essential and therefore we should not be dependent upon it. “Whatever is available easily we can use. There is no objection to using electricity. But we should not be dependent upon it.” Letter to Nityananda dated 16th March, 1977. Ys, Rohita dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 1999 Report Share Posted May 3, 1999 On 03 May 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote: > He had a million cows. How many bulls? He paid some > > form of reasonable wages to thousands of cowherds/milkers/manurehandlers/milk > > shippers/farm workers, etc. > > > > BArtered for with milk products, wages paid in kind. I agree but they needed more than milk and some things they needed were paid for with "money", gold or whatever name. > > Gold coins were certainly used > > I must have missed that reference. In any case, gold has intrinsic value, > unlike money. No question. Far superior to paper. > > . Jewels were also used. What's the difference? > > With jewels I can keep my wife happy, decorate the Deities , do healing. > Jewels > have intrinsic value. No question. > > Krsna gave millions in gold coins and jewels to the simple and humble Sudama > > brahmana. Why are we somehow against this? > > Not against it. I'm not against paper money. Just you used Nanda Maharajah as > an > example, and I was pointing out how he lived in a different set of > circumstances > where money wasn't used. Of if we count gold coins, at least paper money > wasn't > used. The principle behind money was still there - pay, in some form, reasonable remuneration for services or products. If we can improve on the present system of paper via bartering...great! I just want to avoid a voluntary poverty consciousness which sometimes is an excuse for laziness and space-out. "Srila Prabhupada: Are you under the impression that spiritual life means voluntarily accepting poverty? Reporter: Well, I don't know. Srila Prabhupada: A poverty-stricken man may be materialistic and a wealthy man may be very spiritual. Spiritual life does not depend on either poverty or wealth." SSR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 1999 Report Share Posted May 3, 1999 On 03 May 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote: > He had a million cows. How many bulls? He paid some > > form of reasonable wages to thousands of cowherds/milkers/manurehandlers/milk > > shippers/farm workers, etc. > > > > BArtered for with milk products, wages paid in kind. I agree but they needed more than milk and some things they needed were paid for with "money", gold or whatever name. > > Gold coins were certainly used > > I must have missed that reference. In any case, gold has intrinsic value, > unlike money. No question. Far superior to paper. > > . Jewels were also used. What's the difference? > > With jewels I can keep my wife happy, decorate the Deities , do healing. > Jewels > have intrinsic value. No question. > > Krsna gave millions in gold coins and jewels to the simple and humble Sudama > > brahmana. Why are we somehow against this? > > Not against it. I'm not against paper money. Just you used Nanda Maharajah as > an > example, and I was pointing out how he lived in a different set of > circumstances > where money wasn't used. Of if we count gold coins, at least paper money > wasn't > used. The principle behind money was still there - pay, in some form, reasonable remuneration for services or products. If we can improve on the present system of paper via bartering...great! I just want to avoid a voluntary poverty consciousness which sometimes is an excuse for laziness and space-out. "Srila Prabhupada: Are you under the impression that spiritual life means voluntarily accepting poverty? Reporter: Well, I don't know. Srila Prabhupada: A poverty-stricken man may be materialistic and a wealthy man may be very spiritual. Spiritual life does not depend on either poverty or wealth." SSR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 > On 03 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > > > It is the duty of the > > Vaisya to protect the cow not to make money from the milk. > > What did Maharaj Nanda do with all his millions of gallons of milk a day? > How did he become so opulent? Is trade different than "making money"? Value adding maybe, the gopis would go to sell milksweets. Maybe his wealth was from grains. On our farm we are trying to come to grips with an economic policy for the devotees on the farm. We have not milked on this farm since 1995 and have reduced the herd from 50 to 40 through natural attrition. In the meantime we have been purchasing blood milk. In our family budget, milk products are our biggest expense. Two families on the farm have agreed to share in the responsibility of maintaining a milking cow and have agreed to share the milk at no cost with the others while production is high. They may value add and sell the product if they like. I believe that if milk is not a commodity then there is less incentive to exploit the cow. Milk, what a great gift to give in charity. Your servant, Gokula das. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 > On 03 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > > > It is the duty of the > > Vaisya to protect the cow not to make money from the milk. > > What did Maharaj Nanda do with all his millions of gallons of milk a day? > How did he become so opulent? Is trade different than "making money"? Value adding maybe, the gopis would go to sell milksweets. Maybe his wealth was from grains. On our farm we are trying to come to grips with an economic policy for the devotees on the farm. We have not milked on this farm since 1995 and have reduced the herd from 50 to 40 through natural attrition. In the meantime we have been purchasing blood milk. In our family budget, milk products are our biggest expense. Two families on the farm have agreed to share in the responsibility of maintaining a milking cow and have agreed to share the milk at no cost with the others while production is high. They may value add and sell the product if they like. I believe that if milk is not a commodity then there is less incentive to exploit the cow. Milk, what a great gift to give in charity. Your servant, Gokula das. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 >"WWW: Janesvara (Dasa) ACBSP (Syracuse - USA)" <jdf1 (AT) stsi (DOT) net> >jdf1 (AT) stsi (DOT) net, Cow (AT) com (DOT) bbt.se, >Varnasrama.development (AT) com (DOT) bbt.se >"COM: Cow (Protection and related issues)" <Cow (AT) com (DOT) bbt.se>, "COM: >Varnasrama development" <Varnasrama.development (AT) com (DOT) bbt.se> >Re: Cowslaughter in ISKCON? >Mon, 3 May 99 19:11 -0400 > >[Text 2287378 from COM] > >On 03 May 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote: > > > He had a million cows. How many bulls? He paid some > > > form of reasonable wages to thousands of >cowherds/milkers/manurehandlers/milk > > > shippers/farm workers, etc. > > > > > > > BArtered for with milk products, wages paid in kind. > > >I agree but they needed more than milk and some things they needed were >paid >for with "money", gold or whatever name. > > > > > Gold coins were certainly used > > > > I must have missed that reference. In any case, gold has intrinsic >value, > > unlike money. > > >No question. Far superior to paper. > > > > > > . Jewels were also used. What's the difference? > > > > With jewels I can keep my wife happy, decorate the Deities , do >healing. > > Jewels > > have intrinsic value. > > >No question. > This is not such a problem in Kali- yuga- there's so little of it. Wealth like anything else can be used if its favorable to Krsna's service. If its not engaged in Krsna's service, even jewels have no value- like the jewels on the head of a serpent. They only have value when combined with Krsna. However, maya is so strong that one may start out in business, intending to use the profit for Krsna, and be attracted instead into using it for sense-gratification, then its the source of misfortune. This has been the tendency. Therefore, Srila Prabhupada desired our devotee vaisyas to produce food- (the real type) and protect cows, both of which there is a dire shortage in Kali-yuga, and by doing this gain real wealth. Vedically, one's wealth is measured by one's stock of grains and one's number of cows. If these are ample, other types of wealth will be present automatically. Wealth was stored in the form of golden ornaments on the bodies of the ladies, but when there was food shortage, they were traded for food. > > > > Krsna gave millions in gold coins and jewels to the simple and humble >Sudama > > > brahmana. Why are we somehow against this? > > > > Not against it. I'm not against paper money. Just you used Nanda >Maharajah >as > > an > > example, and I was pointing out how he lived in a different set of > > circumstances > > where money wasn't used. Of if we count gold coins, at least paper >money > > wasn't > > used. > > >The principle behind money was still there - pay, in some form, reasonable >remuneration for services or products. > > >If we can improve on the present system of paper via bartering...great! > >I just want to avoid a voluntary poverty consciousness which sometimes is >an >excuse for laziness and space-out. > >"Srila Prabhupada: Are you under the impression that spiritual life means >voluntarily accepting poverty? >Reporter: Well, I don't know. >Srila Prabhupada: A poverty-stricken man may be materialistic and a wealthy >man may be very spiritual. Spiritual life does not depend on either poverty >or >wealth." No, but why do the brahmanas voluntarily accept vows of poverty? >Because its entangling, this wealth, - Niscala > > ____ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 >"WWW: Janesvara (Dasa) ACBSP (Syracuse - USA)" <jdf1 (AT) stsi (DOT) net> >jdf1 (AT) stsi (DOT) net, Cow (AT) com (DOT) bbt.se, >Varnasrama.development (AT) com (DOT) bbt.se >"COM: Cow (Protection and related issues)" <Cow (AT) com (DOT) bbt.se>, "COM: >Varnasrama development" <Varnasrama.development (AT) com (DOT) bbt.se> >Re: Cowslaughter in ISKCON? >Mon, 3 May 99 19:11 -0400 > >[Text 2287378 from COM] > >On 03 May 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote: > > > He had a million cows. How many bulls? He paid some > > > form of reasonable wages to thousands of >cowherds/milkers/manurehandlers/milk > > > shippers/farm workers, etc. > > > > > > > BArtered for with milk products, wages paid in kind. > > >I agree but they needed more than milk and some things they needed were >paid >for with "money", gold or whatever name. > > > > > Gold coins were certainly used > > > > I must have missed that reference. In any case, gold has intrinsic >value, > > unlike money. > > >No question. Far superior to paper. > > > > > > . Jewels were also used. What's the difference? > > > > With jewels I can keep my wife happy, decorate the Deities , do >healing. > > Jewels > > have intrinsic value. > > >No question. > This is not such a problem in Kali- yuga- there's so little of it. Wealth like anything else can be used if its favorable to Krsna's service. If its not engaged in Krsna's service, even jewels have no value- like the jewels on the head of a serpent. They only have value when combined with Krsna. However, maya is so strong that one may start out in business, intending to use the profit for Krsna, and be attracted instead into using it for sense-gratification, then its the source of misfortune. This has been the tendency. Therefore, Srila Prabhupada desired our devotee vaisyas to produce food- (the real type) and protect cows, both of which there is a dire shortage in Kali-yuga, and by doing this gain real wealth. Vedically, one's wealth is measured by one's stock of grains and one's number of cows. If these are ample, other types of wealth will be present automatically. Wealth was stored in the form of golden ornaments on the bodies of the ladies, but when there was food shortage, they were traded for food. > > > > Krsna gave millions in gold coins and jewels to the simple and humble >Sudama > > > brahmana. Why are we somehow against this? > > > > Not against it. I'm not against paper money. Just you used Nanda >Maharajah >as > > an > > example, and I was pointing out how he lived in a different set of > > circumstances > > where money wasn't used. Of if we count gold coins, at least paper >money > > wasn't > > used. > > >The principle behind money was still there - pay, in some form, reasonable >remuneration for services or products. > > >If we can improve on the present system of paper via bartering...great! > >I just want to avoid a voluntary poverty consciousness which sometimes is >an >excuse for laziness and space-out. > >"Srila Prabhupada: Are you under the impression that spiritual life means >voluntarily accepting poverty? >Reporter: Well, I don't know. >Srila Prabhupada: A poverty-stricken man may be materialistic and a wealthy >man may be very spiritual. Spiritual life does not depend on either poverty >or >wealth." No, but why do the brahmanas voluntarily accept vows of poverty? >Because its entangling, this wealth, - Niscala > > ____ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 On 04 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > Maybe his wealth > was from grains. No. His wealth was from working his devotee butt off. Perspiration. And emplying thousands and thousands of others in the milk production "business" or whatever name you want to give it. Nanda had a million cows! Do you realize how many gallons of milk, pounds of butter, curd and yogurt that is daily? Was he just throwing the milk on the ground? I doubt it. How many residents of Vrindavana were there? Certainly not even close to enough to consume tis amount of milk products. Wouldn't it seem common sense that Nanda was serving his king faithfully and producing the milk required by the inhabitants of the nearby cities who could not produce milk in the city? And the king was assuring Nanda that all of his necessities were taken care of and much more in the way of wealth? It was a gigantic enterprise the likes of which we do not even see nowadays. A MILLION cows! How many millions of acres of land were being managed? Employees? Hard work every single day. Or do we not really believe this? > On our farm we are trying to come to grips with an economic policy for the > devotees on the farm. We have not milked on this farm since 1995 and have > reduced the herd from 50 to 40 through natural attrition. In the meantime we > have been purchasing blood milk. In our family budget, milk products are our > biggest expense. I can understand that everyone must be very sad about the situation and that everyone wishes it could be different. It is sometimes very hard to organize and instill incentive and inspiration into people to do things that they otherwise know would be a positive thing. But, with all due respect, this situation does not sound like the typical vaisya community one would envision for followers of Krsna. I take it that reducing the herd through "natural attrition" means the cows are dying? 40 cows on a devotee farm, none milking for 4 years, and everyone is buying blood milk? Hardly the ideal of varnasrama-dharma. I do not mean to criticize the individuals involved (unless they are the leaders of the community and are mismanaging at the expense of the sacred cows and bulls) but this just seems so impractical and downright irresponsible. I presume what we are saying is that because we cannot inspire our devotees to take up the task of vaisya responsibilities in the IDEAL manner then just forget about it all together and let the cows and bulls die "naturally"? At least they are being protected from cow slaughter? In my opinion it sounds like the same old ISKCON devotee story of clear cut laziness due to false renunciation of the varnsrama-dharma institution which requires perspiration from hard work. Renounce the varnas other than "brahmana" (so-called) and depend upon the karmis to supply all of our needs while condemning them as fruitive. It would seem far more practical to accept our fallen nature of not being able to fulfill on the "ideal" of simple living without so-called "ugra-karma" acts and at least make as much money at agriculture as common farmers do everyday. We think that we MUST milk by hand and farm with oxen only otherwise we are failing the "Vedicdevotee" ways so we just give up all together instead of engaging the modes of nature in the service of the Lord. Take up the tractor and milking machine if you have to in order to earn a livelihood. Many more young devotees would be inspired to work on farms if they had the modern technologies afforded to the "karmis" and were paid normal wages. Make a smooth but practical transition to more "ideal" ways but don't falsely renounce work. Every occupation has its "faults" but if dovetailed in the service of the Lord all is purified. What would happen if we had disallowed all book distributors and city temple devotees from utilizing gasoline? They had to walk wherever they wanted to go and distribute the books. And the books themselves would have to be published without the use of electricity. No cars, no airplanes for the sannyasis. Walk to Mayapura. What would Srila Prabhupada have said about that? Is not devotee farming preaching? ITS ALL PREACHING. If we have to accept some less than ideal means so be it. > I believe that if milk is not a commodity then there is less > incentive to exploit the cow. It IS a commodity. Until Satya yuga comes around again I'd get used to the facts of Kali life. We obviously aren't doing very well at stemming the tide of Kali's influence even in devotee communities. Transition is the key. Practical, managed, real time transition. > Milk, what a great gift to give in charity. Charity starts at home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 On 04 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > Maybe his wealth > was from grains. No. His wealth was from working his devotee butt off. Perspiration. And emplying thousands and thousands of others in the milk production "business" or whatever name you want to give it. Nanda had a million cows! Do you realize how many gallons of milk, pounds of butter, curd and yogurt that is daily? Was he just throwing the milk on the ground? I doubt it. How many residents of Vrindavana were there? Certainly not even close to enough to consume tis amount of milk products. Wouldn't it seem common sense that Nanda was serving his king faithfully and producing the milk required by the inhabitants of the nearby cities who could not produce milk in the city? And the king was assuring Nanda that all of his necessities were taken care of and much more in the way of wealth? It was a gigantic enterprise the likes of which we do not even see nowadays. A MILLION cows! How many millions of acres of land were being managed? Employees? Hard work every single day. Or do we not really believe this? > On our farm we are trying to come to grips with an economic policy for the > devotees on the farm. We have not milked on this farm since 1995 and have > reduced the herd from 50 to 40 through natural attrition. In the meantime we > have been purchasing blood milk. In our family budget, milk products are our > biggest expense. I can understand that everyone must be very sad about the situation and that everyone wishes it could be different. It is sometimes very hard to organize and instill incentive and inspiration into people to do things that they otherwise know would be a positive thing. But, with all due respect, this situation does not sound like the typical vaisya community one would envision for followers of Krsna. I take it that reducing the herd through "natural attrition" means the cows are dying? 40 cows on a devotee farm, none milking for 4 years, and everyone is buying blood milk? Hardly the ideal of varnasrama-dharma. I do not mean to criticize the individuals involved (unless they are the leaders of the community and are mismanaging at the expense of the sacred cows and bulls) but this just seems so impractical and downright irresponsible. I presume what we are saying is that because we cannot inspire our devotees to take up the task of vaisya responsibilities in the IDEAL manner then just forget about it all together and let the cows and bulls die "naturally"? At least they are being protected from cow slaughter? In my opinion it sounds like the same old ISKCON devotee story of clear cut laziness due to false renunciation of the varnsrama-dharma institution which requires perspiration from hard work. Renounce the varnas other than "brahmana" (so-called) and depend upon the karmis to supply all of our needs while condemning them as fruitive. It would seem far more practical to accept our fallen nature of not being able to fulfill on the "ideal" of simple living without so-called "ugra-karma" acts and at least make as much money at agriculture as common farmers do everyday. We think that we MUST milk by hand and farm with oxen only otherwise we are failing the "Vedicdevotee" ways so we just give up all together instead of engaging the modes of nature in the service of the Lord. Take up the tractor and milking machine if you have to in order to earn a livelihood. Many more young devotees would be inspired to work on farms if they had the modern technologies afforded to the "karmis" and were paid normal wages. Make a smooth but practical transition to more "ideal" ways but don't falsely renounce work. Every occupation has its "faults" but if dovetailed in the service of the Lord all is purified. What would happen if we had disallowed all book distributors and city temple devotees from utilizing gasoline? They had to walk wherever they wanted to go and distribute the books. And the books themselves would have to be published without the use of electricity. No cars, no airplanes for the sannyasis. Walk to Mayapura. What would Srila Prabhupada have said about that? Is not devotee farming preaching? ITS ALL PREACHING. If we have to accept some less than ideal means so be it. > I believe that if milk is not a commodity then there is less > incentive to exploit the cow. It IS a commodity. Until Satya yuga comes around again I'd get used to the facts of Kali life. We obviously aren't doing very well at stemming the tide of Kali's influence even in devotee communities. Transition is the key. Practical, managed, real time transition. > Milk, what a great gift to give in charity. Charity starts at home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 > > > The principle behind money was still there - pay, in some form, reasonable > remuneration for services or products. > > If we can improve on the present system of paper via bartering...great! Yes, being production oriented is a necessary thing. the society has to be fed. For the immediate future, I am afraid we are stuck with paper money. > > > I just want to avoid a voluntary poverty consciousness which sometimes is an > excuse for laziness and space-out. There is also a lifestyle based on the artificial manipulation of paper and electronic funds that breeds laziness and being spaced out that needs to be avoided. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 > > > The principle behind money was still there - pay, in some form, reasonable > remuneration for services or products. > > If we can improve on the present system of paper via bartering...great! Yes, being production oriented is a necessary thing. the society has to be fed. For the immediate future, I am afraid we are stuck with paper money. > > > I just want to avoid a voluntary poverty consciousness which sometimes is an > excuse for laziness and space-out. There is also a lifestyle based on the artificial manipulation of paper and electronic funds that breeds laziness and being spaced out that needs to be avoided. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 > Was > he just throwing the milk on the ground? Why you are cutting the throat of the cows? After all, you have to get from the mahi, from the land. So as they are, the animal which you are eating, they are getting their eatables from the land. Why don't you get your eatables from the land? Therefore it is said, sarva-kama-dugha mahi. You can get all the necessities of your life from land. So dugha means produce. You can produce your food. Some land should be producing the foodstuff for the animals, and some land should be used for the production of your foodstuffs, grains, fruits, flowers, and take milk. Why should you kill these innocent animals? You take. You keep them muda, happy, and you get so much milk that it will moist, it will make wet the ground. This is civilization. This is civilization. That was being maintained during the time of Maharaja Yudhisthira. That is being described. Maharaja Yudhisthira maintained this standard of civilization. Just see how the economic problems will be solved simply by one movement, this Krsna consciousness movement. Try to understand. Mahi. Because mahi will produce everything. >>> Ref. VedaBase => HIGHLIGHTS: Regulative principles to fulfill desires...protect cows and prosper, kill cows and suffer...get all your necessities fr [sB 1.10.4] "During the reign of Maharaja Yudhisthira, the clouds showered all the water that people needed, and the earth produced all the necessities of man in profusion. Due to its fatty milk bag, and cheerful attitude, the cow used to moisten the grazing ground with milk." Prabhupada: Now, happy attitude. Now the cow are going to be killed. They know it, that "We are going to be killed." They're also intelligent living entity. So how they can be happy? If some human being concentrated in a camp, and they know that "We are going to be killed," can they be happy? So if one is not happy, if the cow is not happy, can she supply sufficient milk? No. No. Therefore just they were happy. Therefore milk was supplied so much that the grazing ground became wet with milk. Muddy. With milk, not with water. So we, we have no intelligence how to live. We... Our Bhagavad-gita says, krsi-go-raksya vaisya. Means krsi-go-raksya, to protect cows. Nowadays not to protect cows -- to kill cows. Just see, business. Vaisya means businessman. So vaisya's business is krsi-go-raksya-vanijyam vaisya-karma svabhava-jam [bg. 18.44]. But no go-raksya. Cutting the throat of go. This kind of sinful activities are going on, and they want to be happy. Instead of giving protection to the cows... In the Bible, also it is said that the animals are given under the protection of the human being. Paramahamsa: Man, yeah, yes. Prabhupada: Man. The protection means to kill them. Just see. They have interpreted like that, that "The animals have been given to us to kill them and eat." This is their interpretation. >>> Ref. VedaBase => Room Conversation with Indian Ambassador -- September 5, 1973, Stockholm > > > But, with all due respect, this situation does not sound like the typical > vaisya community one would envision for followers of Krsna. I take it that > reducing the herd through "natural attrition" means the cows are dying? 40 > cows on a devotee farm, none milking for 4 years, and everyone is buying blood > milk? Hardly the ideal of varnasrama-dharma. Yet an undeniable reality of a failed attempt to establish VAD that can't just be wished away. > > > I do not mean to criticize the individuals involved (unless they are the > leaders of the community and are mismanaging at the expense of the sacred cows > and bulls) but this just seems so impractical and downright irresponsible. > A painful learning experience. > > Take up the tractor and milking machine if you have to in order to earn a > livelihood. Been there, done that, and have 200+ cows now instead of 40. It is not possible to earn a living from milking cows if you don't slaughter the unproductive ones, unless it is subsidized. If the devotees working in the paper money economy will purify their wealth by contributing to Trust Funds that subsidize the cow protection, then it might possibly all work as a team effort. > Many more young devotees would be inspired to work on farms if > they had the modern technologies afforded to the "karmis" and were paid normal > wages. Make a smooth but practical transition to more "ideal" ways but don't > falsely renounce work. Every occupation has its "faults" but if dovetailed in > the service of the Lord all is purified. Actually, having been that route at NV, i can say with some authority, the "modern " technologies are pretty hellish and not many devotees wanted to go that way. But I definately agree with you strong position on work. No matter what the system, without a productive class, the whole thing will perish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 > Was > he just throwing the milk on the ground? Why you are cutting the throat of the cows? After all, you have to get from the mahi, from the land. So as they are, the animal which you are eating, they are getting their eatables from the land. Why don't you get your eatables from the land? Therefore it is said, sarva-kama-dugha mahi. You can get all the necessities of your life from land. So dugha means produce. You can produce your food. Some land should be producing the foodstuff for the animals, and some land should be used for the production of your foodstuffs, grains, fruits, flowers, and take milk. Why should you kill these innocent animals? You take. You keep them muda, happy, and you get so much milk that it will moist, it will make wet the ground. This is civilization. This is civilization. That was being maintained during the time of Maharaja Yudhisthira. That is being described. Maharaja Yudhisthira maintained this standard of civilization. Just see how the economic problems will be solved simply by one movement, this Krsna consciousness movement. Try to understand. Mahi. Because mahi will produce everything. >>> Ref. VedaBase => HIGHLIGHTS: Regulative principles to fulfill desires...protect cows and prosper, kill cows and suffer...get all your necessities fr [sB 1.10.4] "During the reign of Maharaja Yudhisthira, the clouds showered all the water that people needed, and the earth produced all the necessities of man in profusion. Due to its fatty milk bag, and cheerful attitude, the cow used to moisten the grazing ground with milk." Prabhupada: Now, happy attitude. Now the cow are going to be killed. They know it, that "We are going to be killed." They're also intelligent living entity. So how they can be happy? If some human being concentrated in a camp, and they know that "We are going to be killed," can they be happy? So if one is not happy, if the cow is not happy, can she supply sufficient milk? No. No. Therefore just they were happy. Therefore milk was supplied so much that the grazing ground became wet with milk. Muddy. With milk, not with water. So we, we have no intelligence how to live. We... Our Bhagavad-gita says, krsi-go-raksya vaisya. Means krsi-go-raksya, to protect cows. Nowadays not to protect cows -- to kill cows. Just see, business. Vaisya means businessman. So vaisya's business is krsi-go-raksya-vanijyam vaisya-karma svabhava-jam [bg. 18.44]. But no go-raksya. Cutting the throat of go. This kind of sinful activities are going on, and they want to be happy. Instead of giving protection to the cows... In the Bible, also it is said that the animals are given under the protection of the human being. Paramahamsa: Man, yeah, yes. Prabhupada: Man. The protection means to kill them. Just see. They have interpreted like that, that "The animals have been given to us to kill them and eat." This is their interpretation. >>> Ref. VedaBase => Room Conversation with Indian Ambassador -- September 5, 1973, Stockholm > > > But, with all due respect, this situation does not sound like the typical > vaisya community one would envision for followers of Krsna. I take it that > reducing the herd through "natural attrition" means the cows are dying? 40 > cows on a devotee farm, none milking for 4 years, and everyone is buying blood > milk? Hardly the ideal of varnasrama-dharma. Yet an undeniable reality of a failed attempt to establish VAD that can't just be wished away. > > > I do not mean to criticize the individuals involved (unless they are the > leaders of the community and are mismanaging at the expense of the sacred cows > and bulls) but this just seems so impractical and downright irresponsible. > A painful learning experience. > > Take up the tractor and milking machine if you have to in order to earn a > livelihood. Been there, done that, and have 200+ cows now instead of 40. It is not possible to earn a living from milking cows if you don't slaughter the unproductive ones, unless it is subsidized. If the devotees working in the paper money economy will purify their wealth by contributing to Trust Funds that subsidize the cow protection, then it might possibly all work as a team effort. > Many more young devotees would be inspired to work on farms if > they had the modern technologies afforded to the "karmis" and were paid normal > wages. Make a smooth but practical transition to more "ideal" ways but don't > falsely renounce work. Every occupation has its "faults" but if dovetailed in > the service of the Lord all is purified. Actually, having been that route at NV, i can say with some authority, the "modern " technologies are pretty hellish and not many devotees wanted to go that way. But I definately agree with you strong position on work. No matter what the system, without a productive class, the whole thing will perish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 On 04 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > > Maybe his wealth was from grains. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: > No. His wealth was from working his devotee butt off. Perspiration. And emplying thousands and thousands of others in the milk production "business" or whatever name you want to give it. Nanda had a million cows! Do you realize how many gallons of milk, pounds of butter, curd and yogurt that is daily? Was he just throwing the milk on the ground? Comment: Indirectly yes, the cows wet the fields with their milk and the Vaisya community on occasion threw butter lavishly on each other’s bodies without restriction. SB ch. 5 of the 10th canto. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: I doubt it. How many residents of Vrindavana were there? Comment: They were living in Gokula a small sub-village of Vrndavan, the population of the world was much greater then it is today. Just see how many persons inhabited Dvarka and Mathura. Nanda was in his own right a king, sure he was a lesser king but still a king with subjects and large tracts of land. He paid annual taxes to Kamsa because he managed a portion of Kamsa’s kingdom. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: Certainly not even close to enough to consume tis amount of milk products. Wouldn't it seem common sense that Nanda was serving his king faithfully and producing the milk required by the inhabitants of the nearby cities who could not produce milk in the city? Comment: Very likely according to the evidence Srila Prabhupada gives us in KRSNA BOOK. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: And the king was assuring Nanda that all of his necessities were taken care of and much more in the way of wealth? It was a gigantic enterprise the likes of which we do not even see nowadays. A MILLION cows! How many millions of acres of land were being managed? Employees? Hard work every single day. Or do we not really believe this? Comment: It sounds astonishing but is the word of Guru. If one does not believe these plain statements of KRSNA BOOK it indicates to me he has no faith in guru-sadhu-sastra and if he does so it is likely he will not be chanting. No chanting or offering in charity indicates poverty and one is doomed to repeated birth and death in this material world. On 04 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > > On our farm we are trying to come to grips with an economic policy for the devotees on the farm. We have not milked on this farm since 1995 and have reduced the herd from 50 to 40 through natural attrition. In the meantime we have been purchasing blood milk. In our family budget, milk products are our biggest expense. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: > I can understand that everyone must be very sad about the situation and that everyone wishes it could be different. It is sometimes very hard to organize and instill incentive and inspiration into people to do things that they otherwise know would be a positive thing. > But, with all due respect, this situation does not sound like the typical vaisya community one would envision for followers of Krsna. I take it that reducing the herd through "natural attrition" means the cows are dying? 40 cows on a devotee farm, none milking for 4 years, and everyone is buying blood milk? Hardly the ideal of varnasrama-dharma. I do not mean to criticize the individuals involved (unless they are the leaders of the community and are mismanaging at the expense of the sacred cows and bulls) but this just seems so impractical and downright irresponsible. Comment: I agree and this is applicable to all farms that are now managing their herds in the same manner (from what I have seen this is the present standard in ISKCON). On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: I presume what we are saying is that because we cannot inspire our devotees to take up the task of vaisya responsibilities in the IDEAL manner then just forget about it all together and let the cows and bulls die "naturally"? At least they are being protected from cow slaughter? Comment: This is what we are doing. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: In my opinion it sounds like the same old ISKCON devotee story of clear cut laziness due to false renunciation of the varnsrama-dharma institution which requires perspiration from hard work. Renounce the varnas other than "brahmana" (so-called) and depend upon the karmis to supply all of our needs while condemning them as fruitive. Comment: Call the kettle black and throw out the baby with the bath water. If the shoe fits wear it. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: It would seem far more practical to accept our fallen nature of not being able to fulfill on the "ideal" of simple living without so-called "ugra-karma" acts and at least make as much money at agriculture as common farmers do everyday. We think that we MUST milk by hand and farm with oxen only otherwise we are failing the "Vedicdevotee" ways so we just give up all together instead of engaging the modes of nature in the service of the Lord. Take up the tractor and milking machine if you have to in order to earn a livelihood. Many more young devotees would be inspired to work on farms if they had the modern technologies afforded to the "karmis" and were paid normal wages. Make a smooth but practical transition to more "ideal" ways but don't falsely renounce work. Every occupation has its "faults" but if dovetailed in the service of the Lord all is purified. Comment: This is also not acceptable. It will lead to involvement with those wrapped up in returning again for another birth. We have to be ready to give everything to Krsna without reservation not just a token nod of the head. For that is what we are doing now. Srila Prabhupada requested us to do it immediately (what is the count since that day?) not to be dependent (milk machine and tractor mean this). “Our principle we are against nothing and for nothing. Only for Krsna. We want what ever is favourable for Krsna.” So we must be ready to perspire, give substantial recognition to the Real Proprietor by our charity and always decorate our tongue with His holy names. We must have full faith in guru and Krsna that nothing is impossible, if we act in that way all will come to be as it should be. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: What would happen if we had disallowed all book distributors and city temple devotees from utilizing gasoline? They had to walk wherever they wanted to go and distribute the books. And the books themselves would have to be published without the use of electricity. No cars, no airplanes for the sannyasis. Walk to Mayapura. What would Srila Prabhupada have said about that? Is not devotee farming preaching? ITS ALL PREACHING. If we have to accept some less than ideal means so be it. Comment; It is all preaching only as long as the results are given away in charity. Those activities were all engaged in without expectation of remuneration, or in pursuance of giving Krsna to others. All ones endeavour to glorify the Lord. If you get 50 gallons of milk a day then 25 must be given to the temple administrator who will direct the temple brahmanas to cook and offer 12.5 gallons to the Deities. The other 12.5 gallons he will see is distributed to the less fortunate. Twelve and a half gallons you are to use for your families needs (milk, butter, etc.) if you are unable to use then this portion you must sell/trade for the rest of your needs. The last 12.5 gallons are to be turned into ghee and stored in case of emergency. You must do this with the results of all your sweat. The renounced orders (brahmacari, vanaprasta and sannyas) can only take what is needed for simple sustenance and get no material returns. So if you want to live above the poverty level you really got to sweat or inherit it from your ancestors (who had to sweat, some one has to sweat). But remember sadhana comes first and then the emotional needs of the family members. Followed by sweating. The higher the standard you want the more you have to sweat. Follow in the path of Bhaktivinode Thakura. On 04 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > > I believe that if milk is not a commodity then there is less incentive to exploit the cow. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: > It IS a commodity. Until Satya yuga comes around again I'd get used to the facts of Kali life. We obviously aren't doing very well at stemming the tide of Kali's influence even in devotee communities. Transition is the key. Practical, managed, real time transition. Comment: It is a commodity, a symbol of our wealth. If the number of cows are decreased and you depend on the non-devotees for milk or diesel you are in the same boat destined to become stuck on the wheel of samsara. This is the practically of the situation. Gaudiya means no compromise on the order of guru. We are not doing well because we have not got full faith in the holy name and the directions of guru. It will require a lot of sweat and anxiety, it is a test of our sincerity. The way back home is narrow, rocky and you are tested at every step be worthy and do not take to the wider and less rocky ways that only lead back again to this material world. On 04 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > > Milk, what a great gift to give in charity. Charity starts at home. Comment: Remember whose home this is, it is Krsna’s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 On 04 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > > Maybe his wealth was from grains. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: > No. His wealth was from working his devotee butt off. Perspiration. And emplying thousands and thousands of others in the milk production "business" or whatever name you want to give it. Nanda had a million cows! Do you realize how many gallons of milk, pounds of butter, curd and yogurt that is daily? Was he just throwing the milk on the ground? Comment: Indirectly yes, the cows wet the fields with their milk and the Vaisya community on occasion threw butter lavishly on each other’s bodies without restriction. SB ch. 5 of the 10th canto. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: I doubt it. How many residents of Vrindavana were there? Comment: They were living in Gokula a small sub-village of Vrndavan, the population of the world was much greater then it is today. Just see how many persons inhabited Dvarka and Mathura. Nanda was in his own right a king, sure he was a lesser king but still a king with subjects and large tracts of land. He paid annual taxes to Kamsa because he managed a portion of Kamsa’s kingdom. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: Certainly not even close to enough to consume tis amount of milk products. Wouldn't it seem common sense that Nanda was serving his king faithfully and producing the milk required by the inhabitants of the nearby cities who could not produce milk in the city? Comment: Very likely according to the evidence Srila Prabhupada gives us in KRSNA BOOK. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: And the king was assuring Nanda that all of his necessities were taken care of and much more in the way of wealth? It was a gigantic enterprise the likes of which we do not even see nowadays. A MILLION cows! How many millions of acres of land were being managed? Employees? Hard work every single day. Or do we not really believe this? Comment: It sounds astonishing but is the word of Guru. If one does not believe these plain statements of KRSNA BOOK it indicates to me he has no faith in guru-sadhu-sastra and if he does so it is likely he will not be chanting. No chanting or offering in charity indicates poverty and one is doomed to repeated birth and death in this material world. On 04 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > > On our farm we are trying to come to grips with an economic policy for the devotees on the farm. We have not milked on this farm since 1995 and have reduced the herd from 50 to 40 through natural attrition. In the meantime we have been purchasing blood milk. In our family budget, milk products are our biggest expense. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: > I can understand that everyone must be very sad about the situation and that everyone wishes it could be different. It is sometimes very hard to organize and instill incentive and inspiration into people to do things that they otherwise know would be a positive thing. > But, with all due respect, this situation does not sound like the typical vaisya community one would envision for followers of Krsna. I take it that reducing the herd through "natural attrition" means the cows are dying? 40 cows on a devotee farm, none milking for 4 years, and everyone is buying blood milk? Hardly the ideal of varnasrama-dharma. I do not mean to criticize the individuals involved (unless they are the leaders of the community and are mismanaging at the expense of the sacred cows and bulls) but this just seems so impractical and downright irresponsible. Comment: I agree and this is applicable to all farms that are now managing their herds in the same manner (from what I have seen this is the present standard in ISKCON). On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: I presume what we are saying is that because we cannot inspire our devotees to take up the task of vaisya responsibilities in the IDEAL manner then just forget about it all together and let the cows and bulls die "naturally"? At least they are being protected from cow slaughter? Comment: This is what we are doing. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: In my opinion it sounds like the same old ISKCON devotee story of clear cut laziness due to false renunciation of the varnsrama-dharma institution which requires perspiration from hard work. Renounce the varnas other than "brahmana" (so-called) and depend upon the karmis to supply all of our needs while condemning them as fruitive. Comment: Call the kettle black and throw out the baby with the bath water. If the shoe fits wear it. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: It would seem far more practical to accept our fallen nature of not being able to fulfill on the "ideal" of simple living without so-called "ugra-karma" acts and at least make as much money at agriculture as common farmers do everyday. We think that we MUST milk by hand and farm with oxen only otherwise we are failing the "Vedicdevotee" ways so we just give up all together instead of engaging the modes of nature in the service of the Lord. Take up the tractor and milking machine if you have to in order to earn a livelihood. Many more young devotees would be inspired to work on farms if they had the modern technologies afforded to the "karmis" and were paid normal wages. Make a smooth but practical transition to more "ideal" ways but don't falsely renounce work. Every occupation has its "faults" but if dovetailed in the service of the Lord all is purified. Comment: This is also not acceptable. It will lead to involvement with those wrapped up in returning again for another birth. We have to be ready to give everything to Krsna without reservation not just a token nod of the head. For that is what we are doing now. Srila Prabhupada requested us to do it immediately (what is the count since that day?) not to be dependent (milk machine and tractor mean this). “Our principle we are against nothing and for nothing. Only for Krsna. We want what ever is favourable for Krsna.” So we must be ready to perspire, give substantial recognition to the Real Proprietor by our charity and always decorate our tongue with His holy names. We must have full faith in guru and Krsna that nothing is impossible, if we act in that way all will come to be as it should be. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: What would happen if we had disallowed all book distributors and city temple devotees from utilizing gasoline? They had to walk wherever they wanted to go and distribute the books. And the books themselves would have to be published without the use of electricity. No cars, no airplanes for the sannyasis. Walk to Mayapura. What would Srila Prabhupada have said about that? Is not devotee farming preaching? ITS ALL PREACHING. If we have to accept some less than ideal means so be it. Comment; It is all preaching only as long as the results are given away in charity. Those activities were all engaged in without expectation of remuneration, or in pursuance of giving Krsna to others. All ones endeavour to glorify the Lord. If you get 50 gallons of milk a day then 25 must be given to the temple administrator who will direct the temple brahmanas to cook and offer 12.5 gallons to the Deities. The other 12.5 gallons he will see is distributed to the less fortunate. Twelve and a half gallons you are to use for your families needs (milk, butter, etc.) if you are unable to use then this portion you must sell/trade for the rest of your needs. The last 12.5 gallons are to be turned into ghee and stored in case of emergency. You must do this with the results of all your sweat. The renounced orders (brahmacari, vanaprasta and sannyas) can only take what is needed for simple sustenance and get no material returns. So if you want to live above the poverty level you really got to sweat or inherit it from your ancestors (who had to sweat, some one has to sweat). But remember sadhana comes first and then the emotional needs of the family members. Followed by sweating. The higher the standard you want the more you have to sweat. Follow in the path of Bhaktivinode Thakura. On 04 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > > I believe that if milk is not a commodity then there is less incentive to exploit the cow. On 04 May 1999, Janesvara Dasa wrote: > It IS a commodity. Until Satya yuga comes around again I'd get used to the facts of Kali life. We obviously aren't doing very well at stemming the tide of Kali's influence even in devotee communities. Transition is the key. Practical, managed, real time transition. Comment: It is a commodity, a symbol of our wealth. If the number of cows are decreased and you depend on the non-devotees for milk or diesel you are in the same boat destined to become stuck on the wheel of samsara. This is the practically of the situation. Gaudiya means no compromise on the order of guru. We are not doing well because we have not got full faith in the holy name and the directions of guru. It will require a lot of sweat and anxiety, it is a test of our sincerity. The way back home is narrow, rocky and you are tested at every step be worthy and do not take to the wider and less rocky ways that only lead back again to this material world. On 04 May 1999, Gokula das wrote: > > Milk, what a great gift to give in charity. Charity starts at home. Comment: Remember whose home this is, it is Krsna’s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 > The principle behind money was still there - pay, in some form, reasonable remuneration for services or products. If we can improve on the present system of paper via bartering...great! On 04 May 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote: > Yes, being production oriented is a necessary thing. the society has to be fed. For the immediate future, I am afraid we are stuck with paper money. I just want to avoid a voluntary poverty consciousness which sometimes is an excuse for laziness and space-out. On 04 May 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote: >There is also a lifestyle based on the artificial manipulation of paper and electronic funds that breeds laziness and being spaced out that needs to be avoided. Comment: It is of the utmost importance that the devotees should try as much as possible to buy from other Vaisnavas. If they did a demand would be there and the devotee farmer would be inclined to fulfill this need. As it is now, they have no market or a best just a very small clientele. If we must conform to the non-devotee economic market then it should be from those products that have the least amount of karmic result. ys, Rohita dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 1999 Report Share Posted May 4, 1999 > The principle behind money was still there - pay, in some form, reasonable remuneration for services or products. If we can improve on the present system of paper via bartering...great! On 04 May 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote: > Yes, being production oriented is a necessary thing. the society has to be fed. For the immediate future, I am afraid we are stuck with paper money. I just want to avoid a voluntary poverty consciousness which sometimes is an excuse for laziness and space-out. On 04 May 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote: >There is also a lifestyle based on the artificial manipulation of paper and electronic funds that breeds laziness and being spaced out that needs to be avoided. Comment: It is of the utmost importance that the devotees should try as much as possible to buy from other Vaisnavas. If they did a demand would be there and the devotee farmer would be inclined to fulfill this need. As it is now, they have no market or a best just a very small clientele. If we must conform to the non-devotee economic market then it should be from those products that have the least amount of karmic result. ys, Rohita dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 5, 1999 Report Share Posted May 5, 1999 Janesvara wrote > > No. His wealth was from working his devotee butt off. Perspiration. And > emplying thousands and thousands of others in the milk production > "business" or whatever name you want to give it. Nanda had a million cows! > Do you realize how many gallons of milk, pounds of butter, curd and yogurt > that is daily? Was he just throwing the milk on the ground? I doubt it. > How many residents of Vrindavana were there? Certainly not even close to > enough to consume tis amount of milk products. Wouldn't it seem common > sense that Nanda was serving his king faithfully and producing the milk > required by the inhabitants of the nearby cities who could not produce > milk in the city? And the king was assuring Nanda that all of his > necessities were taken care of and much more in the way of wealth? It was > a gigantic enterprise the likes of which we do not even see nowadays. A > MILLION cows! How many millions of acres of land were being managed? > Employees? Hard work every single day. > I agree certainly work for everybody. > Or do we not really believe this? > Here are some figures to ponder If Nanda maharaja was able to utilise all of Vrindavan, 64 square miles, and was keeping 900 thousand cows then he was maintaining 55 cows to the hectare. If all the cows were milking then there were 900,000 calves plus, at 50% male birth rate, 900,000 bulls/bullocks this gives us 165 bovines per hectare. A fairly amazing level of carrying capacity of the land which has to be transendentally understood. The land we have in Kali yuga cannot sustain these levels of production so it is wrong to judge the present activities of the farms based on the descriptions in the Krsna book. Our farm of 200 acres has been evaluated to have a sustainable herd of 8 refreshed cows per year, a herd of 120. Melbourne temple and it's restaurants use 100 kg of ghee per week which would require a milking herd of 35, so you can see how difficult it is to equate our apparent inadequacies to the expectation of the temple devotees who, after reading the Krsna book, cannot understand our performance levels. I am sure that farm devotees all over the world are pondering or have pondered the difficulties of maintaining cows and models are being tried everywhere. In the future more answers will be available. I hope my mathematics is correct. Your servant, Gokula das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.