Call Off The Dogs!

[Guest guest]

"WWW: Vyapaka (Dasa) ACBSP (Montreal - CAN)" wrote:

 

> [Text 2249674 from COM]

>

> Obviously, from this posting and the one you made before on this matter you

> don't understand english. Please don't bother me with your nonsense. It is

not

> my fault you are so attached to that rascal Kirtananda. When are you going to

> take the statue of the Christian saint off of your lawn? Obviously, Bhakti

> Keith is still honoured by some.

>

> On 19 Apr 1999, Madhava Gosh wrote:

>

> .

> >

> > So , since sannyasis are not supposed to manage men or money according to

> > religious principles, if would appear you are saying most of our sannyasis

> are

> > demons?

> >

 

You amuse me. If you want a philosophical discussion, then I will talk

philosophy. You called Kirtananada a demon on the basis he didn't follow

religious principles. I ask a question about the premise, and your answer is I

don't understand English?

 

Instead of philosophy you hurl an implied accusation against me. Where is the

sastra in that? I use a statue of a Christian saint as a lawn ornament and

you

wonder when I will remove it? What do you suggest I replace it with? A

flamingo?

 

 

What was the name of the demon who in Krsna book was invoked, and when he

wasn't

able to accomplish the purpose he was invoked for, turned back on the invoker?

I

would be careful about calling someone a demon. That sort of invocation can be

dangerous to your own spiritual health.

 

Incidentally, if you wish to go ad hominem against me, there are much more

fruitful avenues then my choice of lawn ornamentation. For instance,

Kirtanananda frequently used my lack of attendance at mangala arotik to

denigrate

me. That was quite effective amongst his followers. If you would be

interested

in others, just ask, and I can point you in many more directions.

[Guest guest]

On 21 Apr 1999, Prsnigarbha das wrote:

 

> > Not exactly, it's an almost female body--sans ovarys, uterus, the full

bliss of the pre-menopausal experience, and a 32 oz brain. (Sorry, I couldn't

resist!)

> >

 

> Why should some men, who have exactly nil experience and knowledge

> about how it is to be a woman, insist on speaking the same thing over

> and over again. Isn't it the same thing like always? Men constantly trying

to define what it is to be a woman, always based on pure speculations, and of

course, never asking women for advice.

>

> I find it truly amazing.

>

 

 

Amazing, possibly, but it is still a biologically true statement. Being your

status as a newly self-proclaimed women, I raise the concern that you are

unable to appreciate how smart us men really are.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

..