Guest guest Posted April 21, 1999 Report Share Posted April 21, 1999 On 19 Apr 1999, Madhusudani Radha wrote: > Sorry, not even chromosomes come in neat bimodal distributions. While certainly true, this mainly applies to rare deformities, and the bimodal distribution is indeed accurate for 99.xxx% of the human population. (Incidentally, such chromosome defects are also seen in other species but have different effects; for example, humans with even one Y in there are typically male, whereas insects with two or more X's are typically female.) > 1) There are also people with XX who are anatomically male (there is a > smidgen of the Y chromosome - a gene called SRY present on the XX) > 2) There are also people with XY who are anatomically female (same SRY is > missing from their Y) > 3) There are also people born with XXY or XXXY (about 1/500 live male births) > 4) There are also men with XYY (tall, dull, less fertile...) > 5) There are anatomical females born with XO (Turner's syndrome, ovaries > don't develop properly, no mestruation, no puberty etc.) > 6) There are women with XXX (often retarded or mentally disturbed) > 7) There are people with both XX and XY cells, e.g. Stella Walsh who won an > Olympic gold medal in the 100 meter dash in 1932 (found after her death > upon autopsy) > etc etc. > All in all there are over 70 known irregularities involving the sex > chromosomes. I will graciously accept your point by agreeing that individuals with such irregularities cannot be classified easily according to their chromosomes. However, that only affects a _tiny_ portion of the total human population; the above observations are irrelevant to the situation of most transgendered individuals. Yours, Vijay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.