Guest guest Posted May 15, 1999 Report Share Posted May 15, 1999 On 15 May 1999, Samba das wrote: > I am happy that I now > count Satsvarupa Das Goswami as my initiating spiritual master. I will ask this as humbly and sincerely as I can: You have told us all many times that one should never take a guru who is less than a living uttama-adhikari/mahabhagavata pure devotee. You are therefore telling us that Satsvarupa Maharaja is such a personality on this planet at this time? I am not asking this sarcastically. I have always liked my godbrother Satsvarupa Maharaja. He has given me good siksa instructions in his lectures. But I have not kept track of his activities. I have read his books, but reading, of course, is of no real merit. If Satsvarupa Maharaja is such a mahabhagavata as you imply then shouldn't he be installed as the next acarya, number 33 on the list? This would certainly put to rest any further argumentation as to who should be the acarya in the movement and he could give diksa to everyone seeking the same. It would really end a lot of devisiveness. I'm serious. And if you tell us he is not a mahabhagavata or you do not know if he is such, why would you accept him as your guru? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.