Rtvik argument: Prabhupada still gives diksa

[Guest guest]

On 24 May 1999, Hare Krsna dasi wrote:

 

> Prabhu, can you please clarify this for all the devotees. Do you agree with

> the

> argument of the rtviks that a devotee can still take diksa initiation from

> Srila

> Prabhupada? If your position differs from theirs, could you please explain

the

> difference.

 

 

 

And the witchhunt begins.

 

 

You can call me any name you wish. I find it immature and naive, but that is

only my opinion.

 

If you are planning a long, drawn out trial to determine if I am a heretic

I'll save you the trouble and exit from COM at your request.

[Guest guest]

At 19:20 -0800 5/24/99, WWW: Janesvara (Dasa) ACBSP (Syracuse - USA) wrote:

 

 

>If you are planning a long, drawn out trial to determine if I am a heretic

>I'll save you the trouble and exit from COM at your request.

 

No, please don't. Besides, you're entitled to your opinion, even if it is

that Prabhupada can still give diksa (I'm not saying that's what you

think).

 

>And the witchhunt begins.

 

May s/he who has never had any disagreement with the GBC throw the first

stone..... oooops, where did everyone go? ;-)

 

Ys,

Madhusudani dasi

[Guest guest]

"WWW: Janesvara (Dasa) ACBSP (Syracuse - USA)" wrote:

 

> [Text 2343630 from COM]

>

> On 24 May 1999, Hare Krsna dasi wrote:

>

> > Prabhu, can you please clarify this for all the devotees. Do you agree

with

> > the

> > argument of the rtviks that a devotee can still take diksa initiation from

> > Srila

> > Prabhupada? If your position differs from theirs, could you please explain

> the

> > difference.

>

> And the witchhunt begins.

>

> You can call me any name you wish. I find it immature and naive, but that is

> only my opinion.

>

> If you are planning a long, drawn out trial to determine if I am a heretic

> I'll save you the trouble and exit from COM at your request.

 

Lighten up Janesh. It's just a question seeking clarification. Please set the

example of allowing others the opportunity to have their confusions cleared up

about your publicly stated conclusions.

 

Frankly, your response is eerily similar to that often given by your

godbrother

Kirtanananda. When a question would get a little too close for comfort he

would

just attack the qualifications of the questioner. Surely you don't mean to

follow

in those footsteps?