Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Varna determination and who trains

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

>

> > The varna training is indeed received rather from an another

> > experienced person situated in that particular varna,

>

>

> Not according to A.C.Bhaktivedanta Swami:

 

At least we agree that it is not a spiritual master who

does it, or do we really? Not a single quote that you provided

gave the confirmation that it is a *spiritual master* that

is supposed to train people into their varnic occupation.

 

I mean, we are splitting hears about what kind of a Vaisnava

is to be called a bona fide spiritual master on the first

place, finding out that such nittya-siddha is more

rare and more precious than anything else in this creation.

And here you are, right on the very spot, proposing that

such personalities are meant to train millions and billions

of people into their varnic occupations.

 

 

As far as wether it is even just brahmanas that are to be

ones to train everybody else into their varnic skills, a

very indicative Prabhupada's statement appears in the

very quote that you provided:

 

"So brahmana should be expert in every kind of knowledge.

If he requires, he will become teacher. This is brahmana."

 

What I would understand -- if there is no more qualified

carpenters to teach their students how to make the

windows, I guess a brahmana would do it then. Or if

the military officers have become so useless that

they can't train properly their soldiers anymore how

to use their weapons and how to kill the enemy, then

guess what... if it requires...

 

 

----------------------

 

You know what. Before we attempt some further discussion

in this direction, let's first clear one step after another.

Let's start with defining the terms we are using (so that

we don't run into each other's mouth anymore). So, yes. Your

proposal was that it is gurus to be the ones to train

the varnas and asramas (right?). Define this term "guru"

so that we may know wether you think "a pure devotee

of the Lord" or "leader" or "sannyas" or "brahmana"...

 

-----------------------

 

 

 

> > activities). So, you turn a "coin" this way or that way, ISCKON gurus

> > got to get blamed no matter what.

>

>

> Yes. This is their problem.

>

> This is only because the ISKCON gurus have not yet in the last 25 years

> followed Srila Prabhupada's orders to divide themselves into the varnas to

> teach the proper subjects they have developed expertise in.

>

>

> "Srila Prabhupada: We are getting so many sannyasis. They should teach.

> The teaching should be done by the sannyasis."

 

 

Oh... I see now. With "guru" you meant "sannyas".

(actually, you never said it, you are right)

 

"The teaching should be done by sannyasis" is supposed to

read "gurus got the order to divide themselves into the

varnas"??? Santa Maria Virgina!

 

 

 

One sentence only, taken out of somewhere, without any reference

to anything, is just enough for you to "prove" how ISCKON gurus

disregarded the order from Prabhupada to divide themselves into

the varnas to teach the people "the proper subjects".

 

But the best part is yet to come... You know, in order to

give the order to gurus to *divide themselves* into varnas,

Prabhupada got to give them order to become the gurus on

the first place. Only after that they could possibly get the

order to "divide themselves" (into whatever you like to say).

But nobody hold the breath till your answer arrives... NO

WAY! That would mean that they are authorized, bona fide gurus.

And that's something that we can't allow to pass through.

 

 

I mean, you already put them into the quotation marks:

 

<< I would love to see many "gurus" established to train

the varnas and asramas. >>

 

.... indicating that they are not real gurus, but so-called

gurus. What further insisting on producing some additional

"order disobeying" you are in need for anyway??

 

 

ys mnd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

"WWW: Janesvara (Dasa) ACBSP (Syracuse - USA)" wrote:

 

> [Text 2345282 from COM]

>

> On 25 May 1999, Mahanidhi das wrote:

>

> > > Hare Krsna dasi wrote:

> > > But in Srila Prabhupada's description below, it appears that the guru

> > > would be the one who determines what is the appropriate varna for the

> > > disciple to serve Krsna.

> > > Once the guru designates the varna of the disciple, then the disciple

> > > might even be sent to someone else to train him.

>

> This interpretation I disagree with. This would be more applicable to an

ideal

> Vedic community or city with well established and numerous grihasta-brahmana

> gurus who know their job in the varnasrama-dharma institution. They teach a

> particular varna because that is what brahmanas do.

 

It is really stupendous to me how you have this tendency to brush away complete

sections of what other people write in their posts. I specifically

acknowledged

that in many cases brahmanas will do the training. I specifically referred to

the

Varnasrama walks which you quote below. But I also quoted another statement

which

Srila Prabhupada made only one month later when he seemed to expand on who

could

do the training -- not only brahmanas, but experts in other varnas as well

Please

note:

 

<<In the Varnasrama Walks (March 1974), Srila Prabhupada proposes that it is

brahmanas who will be teaching all the subjects, whether brahmana, ksatriya,

vaisya, or sudra. In this version (only one month later) Srila Prabhupada

presents another possible method of training -- that the teacher would not

necessarily be a brahmana, he might in fact be a vaisya, ksatriya, sudra, etc.

 

<<So, the teacher might be a brahmana or even a sudra (in this example, a

musician),

but Prabhupada specifically states that the guru will test the candidate and

see

*which* varna is best suited to him. Therefore, it seems that the guru would

not

really be specialized to accepting disciples only from one particular varna.

 

************************

 

Again, here is my example, wherein Srila Prabhupada indicates that it is not

only

the brahmanas who can provide varna training.

 

**************************

 

Morning Walk Hyderabad, April 20, 1974

740420MW.HYD

 

Pancadravida: How do you teach a varnasrama college? In varnasrama college if

somebody comes in... They say, "I want to be ksatriya" or "I want to be

vaisya."

Is it like that? Prabhupada: No, that will be tested by the teachers, what for

he

is fit. He will be test by the guru.

 

Pancadravida: Who will teach him to be a ksatriya or who will teach him to be a

vaisya?

Prabhupada: A ksatriya, a brahmana. Just like if you want to learn music, you

have

to go to a musician.

Pancadravida: So where will we get ksatriyas and...?

 

Prabhupada: That is in the sastra. Anyone can learn it. Just like if you want

to

be doctor, so you must have this qualification. Similarly, these things are

stated

in the Bhagavad-gita. Ksatriya means if there is fight, he must go forward

first

of all, risking his life. That is ksatriya.

 

Pancadravida: So we have men who could teach this? Do we have men...?

Prabhupada: Yes. (break) Because he knows how to teach. That's all.

 

Pancadravida: The brahmanas, they all become devotee... They would all be

engaged

in devotional life as...

Prabhupada: This is also devotion, to teach a ksatriya, because this is

necessary

in the society. This is also devotion.

 

Pancadravida: And vaisyas?

Prabhupada: Just like when Krsna is fighting. Krsna is fighting, killing the

demons. So that is also devotion, if you help Krsna by killing demons, not that

simply by chanting, you supply... Just like Bhismadeva. He even injured Krsna,

and

Krsna took it very pleasant. Instead of throwing flowers, he pierced His body

with

arrow.

 

So everything for the service. If Krsna is pleased being pierced by the arrow

the

devotee will do that. His only business is how to please Krsna.

 

*************************

 

Now here is your example, which I have already acknowledged as *one example* of

how a person may be trained in his varna.

 

*************************

 

> Besides, why guess, Srila Prabhupada told us how it is to happen:

>

> "Prabhupada: ...This is brahmana.

> Hrdayananda: So what kind of practical work can we engage them in?

> Prabhupada: They will all be teachers. Just like Drona. He was brahmana, but

> he was teaching military art to the Pandavas.... So brahmana should be expert

> in every kind of knowledge. If he requires, he will become teacher. This is

> brahmana.

 

**************************

 

When I offer Srila Prabhupada's suggestion that a guru could guide his disciple

to

a member of a particular varna for training you reject that idea:

 

> > Hare Krsna dasi wrote:

> > But in Srila Prabhupada's description below, it appears that the guru

> > would be the one who determines what is the appropriate varna for the

> > disciple to serve Krsna.

> > Once the guru designates the varna of the disciple, then the disciple

> > might even be sent to someone else to train him.

 

Janesvara commented:

 

This interpretation I disagree with. This would be more applicable to an ideal

Vedic community or city with well established and numerous grihasta-brahmana

gurus who know their job in the varnasrama-dharma institution.

 

*******************

 

But if you look back very carefully to the April 20th conversation, you will

see

that Prabhupada is not speaking of an ideal Vedic community. He is speaking of

a

transitional community, for right now. In an ideal Vedic community, there is

no

such thing as a varnasrama college, because learning can take place in a

spontaneous, much less structured way, because many people already know how to

do

different tasks. The varnasrama college that Srila Prabhupada proposes is a

brand

new thing -- never seen before by any traditional Vedic community.

 

So, when Prabhupada speaks of getting training from those who are not

brahmanas,

he means right now, not in some idylic state. But, once again, we must also

see

how brahmana instruction will fit in and where it will be essential.

 

For example, we can learn quite a bit from non-devotee cowherds about

rotational

grazing, etc. Nevertheless, there are also gaps in the knowledge that we could

receive from them because they know nothing of the philosophy of cow

protection.

Therefore, any training that we get from a non-devotee cowherd also needs to be

overseen by a brahmana advisor.

 

your servant,

 

Hare Krsna dasi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...