Guest guest Posted June 9, 1999 Report Share Posted June 9, 1999 "COM: Samba (das) SDG (Mauritius)" wrote: > [Text 2385059 from COM] > > ...I was not talking about the devotees being satisfied with ISKCON. I was > refering to the comforts the material world offers at great ecological (and > other) expense; the results of an 'Ugrakarmic' society. It is these > devotees, who make nice profits from paintings, so that they can relax for > half the year, who are often the most vocal criticisers of the ISKCON > regime. > > We understand that we are to 'work'. And this work must be according to our > nature, but also according to the necesities or needs and responsibilities > of life. If people were engaged in the cultivation of their own food, in > cooperation with the laws of nature, they would always have some meaningful > engagement. When one is flush with cash, he is in danger of becoming idle, > which then presents all sorts of problems, as we know what the devil does > with such unengaged minds. > > YS. First of all, a couple points in favor of our vaisya businessmen. 1. In many countries, it is very difficult to get started in farming. In the U.S., there is a saying that practically speaking you cannot go into farming unless you inherit the farm from someone else. Farmland is expensive, especially if one has to acquire it on a commercial scale. Near urban areas, often the tax rate drives the farmer out of business, since he is taxed at the rate it would sell for, if developers were selling it for expensive homes or office buildings. [Note: this is totally the opposite of Srila Prabhupada's explanation how we should organize taxation in varnasrama -- based on production, and paid in-kind, not in cash after the product's price has been beated down through market-place competition.] 2. It is very difficult to get training in farming. On the other side of the coin: I am in anxiety for our painting-salesmen vaisyas you describe. I wonder if they have any inkling of the possibility that their affluent lifestyle could be on the verge of collapse in 6 more months. Many of the countries which provide the cheap labor which make possible profitable businesses like this are such poor countries that they cannot afford to properly upgrade their systems for Y2K. How will these profitable businesses which are based on cheap foreign labor continue next January if it is no longer possible to telephone the countries where the suppliers are? What if their ocean ports no longer function? What if their banking systems break down? What if their electicity shuts down? What if the municiple water and sewage systems fail? What if they can no longer obtain sufficient petroleum to keep their economies going? What if the government is not able to meet its responsibilities to the people and certain groups use this as an opportunity to stir up riiots to overthrow the government? What if one or several of these things happen? How profitable will their business be then? So, I hope they are starting to consider other possibilities. Samba is right, of course, ideally these vaisyas should be growing food. But, at the same time, we have to join together to begin to provide training opportunities. It won't be very fruitful to simply criticize them. Speaking of which -- we are still planning our KANDAVAPRASTHA: Varnasrama Curriculum Development sessions for June 27-July 3 in Vienna, Maine. All are invited to chant Hare Krsna to the mosquitos and join in hewing out the details to Srila Prabhupada's varnasrama colleges. your servant, Hare Krsna dasi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.