Guest guest Posted June 22, 1999 Report Share Posted June 22, 1999 Recently Jitakrodha prabhu has raised the issue of whether it is acceptable to earn one's livelihood by relying on the cow slaughter industry, since he heard some devotees were proposing such an enterprise. Following is a letter from Paramananda dasa, ISKCON Minister of Agriculture for about 10 years, from the late 1970s to the late 1980s. I thought it would be of historical interest. I have also included pertinent quotes from Srila Prabhupada on the topic of earning one's living through fair and honest means. Because it is Kali Yuga and we live in an economy which is "centered on animal killing" often it is difficult to avoid undesirable work. Nevertheless, we should carefully consider the instructions put forth below. After receiving the letter from the Minister of Agriculture, the GBC dropped its plans to raise funds by selling a karmi milk product. your servant Hare Krsna dasi 22 June 1999 **************************************** Letter to the GBC from Paramananda dasa, ISKCON Minister of Agriculture December 5, 1981 Dear Prabhus, Please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada. This is a letter concerning the selling of Meadow Fresh, the milk substitute that is being marketed by some of our ISKCON temples now. My support and participation have been solicited in the selling of Meadow Fresh. As the ISKCON farm minister, I have to decline from supporting or participating in this program. The reason is mainly that the dairy industry, of which this is a product, is actually the same industry as the cow slaughter industry. They are one and the same. This should be understood. I am completely convinced that the devotees who are selling this are purely motivated and their interest is to make money to spread Krsna Consciousness. But not having contact with this dairy industry, you are unaware of this fact, **that it is non-different from the cow slaughter industry.** In one hand they are holding the carcass of the cow and in the other hand they are holding the bucket of milk. And they will sell whichever one they get the most money for. This should be understood. So to sell this product is bolstering up this dairy industry and participating in it in a very direct way. Srila Prabhupada said a lot of things about cow protection. It was very dear to him. He made it very clear to those of us who inquired from him about it that it is not within our jurisdiction to take the life of the cow. "The cow is mother. Don't kill mother. No matter what you do, don't kill mother. Don't kill the cow." So I feel very sure that anything this closely linked with the slaughter of the cow would be rejected by Srila Prabhupada for an ISKCON business. The same man who is taking this cow and chopping off its head, who's taking the cow when she is five of six years old, after giving milk for several years, and chopping off her head and serving her up for dinner, he's the same man who is selling this milk and making the money to sustain and develop these activities of slaughtering the cow, killing mother. This is much too direct. We understand that Srila Prabhupada allowed us to drink milk from these karmi dairies when there was no other milk to drink. In this connection he said, "A blind uncle is better than no uncle at all." So to drink this milk is better than not to drink any milk. But for ISKCON to engage in a big business to sell this milk product from the karmi dairies is a completely different thing. It is a different degree of involvement - much more direct and premeditated. ....So don't be confused about this issue please. Srila Prabhupada made it quite clear that there was no circumstance that anyone could think of that would justify the killing of the cow. He said even if you have to eat meat for some reason, then don't eat the cow; eat some lower animal. But don't kill the cow, don't kill mother. It is too sinful. It is so sinful. And he also said here at Gita-nagari that if you protect the cow, you will not be in scarcity. So actually the position that you are taking when you sell the Meadow Fresh, although it is a little unknowing on your part, is that you are saying: "I'm sorry, Mother, we need money to spread this Krsna Consciousness movement and ultimately, when this Krsna Consciousness movement gets spread all over the world, people will stop eating meat and cow protection will be going on. In order to do this, mother, we have to sacrifice you for a higher purpose. For the ultimate purpose of protecting you, we are going to have to take your life." So my point is that Srila Prabhupada would not sanction this. He made it quite clear that it was outside of our jurisdiction to make any decision like that, that for any reason we may kill mother. We may not make that decision, that in order to spread Krsna Consciousness we have to kill our mother, the cow; for the ultimate benefit of the cow, we must sacrifice the lives of so many cows. If you protect the cow, you will not be in scarcity. Just like we don't think that by taking the time every day to chant japa, that we are losing time for the spreading of the Krsna Consciousness movement. No! That time is not lost. So this cow protection is another principle and to renounce it is favor of making money in order to spread Krsna Consciousness is not acceptable. Your servant, Paramananda dasa Minister of Agriculture ***************************************************** ***************************************************** Srila Prabhupada on contaminated means of economic development: ****************************************** Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.17.4 Purport For a Sanatanist (a follower of Vedic principles) it is the duty of every householder to have cows and bulls as household paraphernalia, not only for drinking milk, but also for deriving religious principles. The Sanatanist worships cows on religious principles and respects brahmanas. The cow's milk is required for the sacrificial fire, and by performing sacrifices the householder can be happy. The cow's calf not only is beautiful to look at, but also gives satisfaction to the cow, and so she delivers as much milk as possible. But in the Kali-yuga, the calves are separated from the cows as early as possible for purposes which may not be mentioned in these pages of Srimad-Bhagavatam. The cow stands with tears in her eyes, the sudra milkman draws milk from the cow artificially, and when there is no milk the cow is sent to be slaughtered. These greatly sinful acts are responsible for all the troubles in present society. ***People do not know what they are doing in the name of economic development.*** [Emphasis added.] The influence of Kali will keep them in the darkness of ignorance. Despite all endeavors for peace and prosperity, they must try to see the cows and the bulls happy in all respects. Foolish people do not know how one earns happiness by making the cows and bulls happy, but it is a fact by the law of nature. Let us take it from the authority of Srimad-Bhagavatam and adopt the principles for the total happiness of humanity. *************************************** THE MEANS OF LIVELIHOOD MUST BE VERY FAIR Prabhupada's Lectures Srimad-Bhagavatam 1976 760522S3.HON Prabhupada: (leads verse recitation) Bandy-aksaih kaitavais cauryair garhitam vrttim asthitah bibhrat kutumbam asucir yatayam asa dehinah. So in this way, Ajamila, he practiced this unfair way of livelihood, bandy-aksaih kaitavais cauryair garhitam vrttim asthitah. So vrtti means livelihood. If one adopts abominable livelihood, there is no, I mean to say, hope of spiritual advancement. Finished. *************************************** Srimad-Bhagavatam Canto 1: Chapter Fourteen, Text 3 :TRANSLATION TRANSLATION ...He saw that the direction of eternal time had changed, and this was very fearful. There were disruptions in the seasonal regularities. The people in general had become very greedy, angry and deceitful. And he saw that they were adopting foul means of livelihood. PURPORT When civilization is disconnected from the loving relation of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, symptoms like changes of seasonal regulations, foul means of livelihood, greed, anger and fraudulence become rampant. The change of seasonal regulations refers to one season's atmosphere becoming manifest in another season--for example the rainy season's being transferred to autumn, or the fructification of fruits and flowers from one season in another season. A godless man is invariably greedy, angry and fraudulent. Such a man can earn his livelihood by any means, black or white. *************************************** Srimad-Bhagavatam Canto 2: Chapter Seven, Text 6 :PURPORT The brahmacari, or a boy from the age of five years, especially from the higher castes, namely from the scholarly parents (the brahmanas), the administrative parents (the ksatriyas), or the mercantile or productive parents (the vaisyas), is trained until twenty-five years of age under the care of a bona fide guru or teacher, and under strict observance of discipline he comes to understand the values of life along with taking specific training for a livelihood. *************************************** Srimad-Bhagavatam Canto 2: Chapter Eight, Text 21 :PURPORT One should earn his livelihood easily and honestly, for it is better to become a coolie for an honest livelihood than to become a great man in society by hook and crook. There is no harm if one becomes the richest man in the world by honest dealings, but one should not sacrifice the honest means of livelihood simply to accumulate wealth. Such an endeavor is harmful to devotional service. *************************************** Srimad-Bhagavatam Canto 3: Chapter Six, Text 32 :TRANSLATION The means of livelihood of all persons, namely production of grains and their distribution to the prajas, was generated from the thighs of the Lord's gigantic form. The mercantile men who take charge of such execution are called vaisyas. PURPORT Human society's means of living is clearly mentioned here as visa, or agriculture and the business of distributing agricultural products, which involves transport, banking, etc. Industry is an artificial means of livelihood, and large-scale industry especially is the source of all the problems of society. In Bhagavad-gita also the duties of the vaisyas, who are engaged in visa, are stated as cow protection, agriculture and business. We have already discussed that the human being can safely depend on the cow and agricultural land for his livelihood. *************************************** Srimad-Bhagavatam Canto 3: Chapter Thirty, Text 33 :PURPORT One should work honestly according to his qualification. He should not earn his livelihood unfairly, by means for which he is not qualified. If a brahmana who works as a priest so that he may enlighten his followers with the spiritual way of life is not qualified as a priest, then he is cheating the public. One should not earn by such unfair means. The same is applicable to a ksatriya or to a vaisya. It is especially mentioned that the means of livelihood of those who are trying to advance in Krsna consciousness must be very fair and uncomplicated. Here it is mentioned that he who earns his livelihood by unfair means (kevalena) is sent to the darkest hellish region. *************************************** Srimad-Bhagavatam Canto 6: Chapter Five, Text 36 :PURPORT Vaisyas should earn their livelihood through agriculture and cow protection. *************************************** Srimad-Bhagavatam Canto 7: Chapter Fourteen, Text 10 :PURPORT These are the different occupational duties by which men should earn their livelihood, and in this way human society should be simple. At the present moment, however, everyone is engaged in technological advancement, which is described in Bhagavad-gita as ugra-karma--extremely severe endeavor. This ugra-karma is the cause of agitation within the human mind. Men are engaging in many sinful activities and becoming degraded by opening slaughterhouses, breweries and cigarette factories, as well as nightclubs and other establishments for sense enjoyment. In this way they are spoiling their lives. In all of these activities, of course, householders are involved, and therefore it is advised here, with the use of the word api, that even though one is a householder, one should not engage himself in severe hardships. One's means of livelihood should be extremely simple. ************************** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.