Guest guest Posted June 28, 1999 Report Share Posted June 28, 1999 Pamho. AgtSP. > This is not to support the ritvik idea, but we should be careful in not > watering down our Gaudiya Vaisnava siddhanta by propounding that a > bona-fide guru may fall down. In order to understand the real > qualification of a guru, we should study the life of the immediate > followers of Lord Caitanya and all great maha-bhagavasts in Srimad > Bhagavatam. "The Mayavadi philosophers have presented their arguments in such attractive, flowery language that hearing Mayavada philosophy may sometimes change the mind of even a maha-bhagavata, or very advanced devotee." (Adi 7.110, Purport) "The Mayavada commentary Sariraka-bhasya is like poison for a Vaisnava. It should not be touched at all. Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura remarks that even a maha-bhagavata, or highly elevated devotee who has surrendered himself unto the lotus feet of Krsna, sometimes falls down from pure devotional service if he hears the Mayavada philosophy of Sariraka-bhasya. This commentary should therefore be shunned by all Vaisnavas." ((Antya 2.95, Purport) TEXT 96 maha-bhagavata yei, krsna prana-dhana yara mayavada-sravane citta avasya phire tanra" SYNONYMS maha-bhagavata yei—one who is a highly elevated devotee; krsna—Lord Krsna; prana-dhana yara—whose life and soul; mayavada-sravane—by hearing the Mayavada philosophy; citta—the heart; avasya—certainly; phire—changes; tanra—his. TRANSLATION "The Mayavada philosophy presents such a jugglery of words that even a highly elevated devotee who has accepted Krsna as his life and soul changes his decision when he reads the Mayavada commentary on Vedanta-sutra." (Antya 2.96) Ys Svarupa das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.