Guest guest Posted June 30, 1999 Report Share Posted June 30, 1999 > ALLAH AKBAR! > > > > Abdullah das. > > (I just got re-initiated by the local imam, so please don't > bother me anymore about your obsession, Harikesa M.) LOL Your servant, Gokula das. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 1999 Report Share Posted June 30, 1999 > [Text 2433930 from COM] > > Srila prabhu wrote: > > >For someone as yourself who made the grave error of mistaking and > >accepting a NON bona fide guru for a spiritual master, you display a decided > >lack of humility, remorse and introspection. It's the sampradaya that is important. Over emphasis on what an individual guru may or may not have been or what he/she may or may not be now, seems to me to be missing that essesntial point. The connection made at initiation is to the guru as representative of the sampradaya, and is not limited to the guru as individual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 1999 Report Share Posted June 30, 1999 Madhava Gosh prabhu wrote: > It's the sampradaya that is important. Over emphasis on what an individual > guru may or may not have been or what he/she may or may not be now, seems to > me to be missing that essential point. The connection made at initiation is > to the guru as representative of the sampradaya, and is not limited to the > guru as individual. A very good and conclusive statement. All glories to you and your inteligence. Ys Harsi das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 1999 Report Share Posted July 7, 1999 On 06 Jul 1999, Sthita-dhi-muni Dasa wrote: > To me, constantly harping on this point almost begins to sound reminiscent of the brahman who constantly meditated on the alleged offenses of the prostitute. My defence of sadhus may sound like harping to those who wish to dismiss the point as having much validity or importance. Hopefully, there are some members on this conference who will take my words seriously, because there is nothing more serious or damaging to our spiritual prospects than slandering senior Vaisnavas. Do you take Prabhupada's books seriously? Sincerely, Srila dasa > I am not sure how healthy it is obsessively meditating on the comparitive potency of both real and imagined offenses towards various Vaisnavas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.