Guest guest Posted July 7, 1999 Report Share Posted July 7, 1999 On 29 Jun 1999, Sthita-dhi-muni Dasa wrote: > Yes, that is personalism. There will be different perspectives and so on within the more general principles of Gaudiya Vaisnavism. But for me a > sticking point might remain concerning maintaining a focus on Prabhupada's perspective within his own institution -- judging from some of the things being attributed to various gaudiya camps. I don't think that needs to be a sticking point though, just a matter of basic respect for the principle of what it means to be the founder/acaraya of a particular institution. For me, the "sticky" point is that we have enshrined sectarianism and anachronisms of the past in the name of "keeping our focus on Srila Prabhupada." Srila B.R. Sridhara Maharaja nailed the problem on the head many years ago in "Sri Guru and His Grace" when we termed what was going on in ISKCON as "Society consciousness" instead of what we should be doing, Krsna consciousness. Similarly, ISKCON stands to gain a tremendous wealth of transcendental wisdom and Gaudiya Vaisnava culture by intimating associating with Gaudiya Math stalwarts. This doesn't necessitate losing our identity as Prabhupada's followers or forgeting whatever we have learned from him. Every new knowledge requires assimilation and accommodation. It's called *LEARNING*! Sometimes this is a painful or an awkward process. Truth isn't always palatable. "You are diseased," may seem like harsh words. But if it's true, we had best heed them and take the appropriate action. Our tattered history in ISKCON has shown that in the name of "following Prabhupada strictly" (expression coined and liberally used in GBC position papers during the Zonal Acarya era), our beloved leaders deviated us more from the straight and narrow than anything we could possibly hear from Prabhupada's godbrothers. Sthita Prabhu's apprehension about the Gaudiya Math is therefore a *red herring* -- an excuse that distracts us from the issues we urgently need to address. FACTS: Over the years, most devotees, Prabhupada disciples and grand-disciples included, have lost faith in the leaders of ISKCON as spiritual authorities. EVIDENCE: The hundreds and tens of thousands of disciples of Bhagavan, Bhavananda, Ramesvara, Kirtanananda, Jagadisa, Hansadutta, etc and now Harikesa have become orphans, suffering massive losses in faith and many of them leaving devotional service /ISKCON as a direct consequence. Over the years, these devotees have comprised the major part of ISKCON's active members. Furthermore, we know that many senior disciples of gurus WHO ARE NOT (yet) considered "FALLEN" are losing faith that their gurus are competent enough to lead them across the ocean of material existence. And it goes without saying that the vast majority of Prabhupada's disciples have little faith in ISKCON's leadership as a vital spiritual force. ISKCON needs a spiritual shot in the arm, and it is not going to come from the GBC -- or Bhakta Joe or Bhaktin Mary. Let's get real. It's time to go back to our roots (something most of us generally do in midlife) and recognize our greater Vaisnava family from which ISKCON originally came and where we derive our strength. Let's graft the ISKCON branch back onto the Gaudiya tree before it falls away completely (what with rtvikvada, soft rtviik, sadhu-ninda, etc.) Soberly, Dasanudasa, Srila dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.