Sentimentalism vs Sadhu's knife

[Guest guest]

>

> Not to say that Harikesa Prabhu is not an advanced soul. But his tenure of

> "advancement" is in a state of limbo. As bonafide disciples, it behooves

> you to take shelter of genuinely advanced souls for proper guidance during

> this difficult period. This "taking shelter" has little to do with any

> institutional rigamarole ("complex rules and rituals"). To dismiss HKS's

> changed situation as not out of the ordinary is simply naive and foolish,

> frankly speaking. It is an emergency!

>

> If you cannot accept this fact, then there is hardly anything more I can

> say to you beyond this except, "Please forgive me for disturbing your

> faith. Hare Krsna."

 

 

This is a hypocrisy, Srila prabhu.

 

To one disciple of HKS (Sraddha dd) you are referring as a bona

fide disciple of him, giving her advices how to behave "during this

difficult period". And to another one (Mahanidhi das), you were just

some days ago cutting of the head (in a "Balarama style") as someone

NEVER having a bona fide guru at al and NEVER being properly initiated

by a BONA FIDE guru, "exposing" thus to the public the hypocrisy of his

position as a somebody of a poor judgment in accepting someone for a

guru that was not bona fide...

 

One never can be sure with you, what kind of a dirty under-belt

kick to receive from. You are twisted in your speaking the "facts"

and "truths". As the current winds blow, so you "facts" and speeches

are turning that direction also.

 

 

>

> If you are actually inquisitive, however, I will try address your points

> as tactfully but as truthfully as I can.

 

"Truth" can be a prostitute. So let's watch out.

 

 

>

> Let us hear his sincere regrets for his past misdeeds, and I will offer my

> most humble dandavats before him and my embarrassed apologies to everyone.

> Until then, I pay my respects at a distance.

 

And since you have taken the position of someone *dictating* what

exactly his past misdeeds were that he got to regret for, and

since you are the one to decide wether his eventual regrets for

it are to be acknowledged as *sincere* or not... tus this leaves

us with but a rhetorics of yours.

 

The point being made was not about wether you are interested in

offering your humble dandavats to HKS or not. Just that you were

perceived as a someone exploiting his case and his condition for

whatever goals you got on your mind. The above mentioned duplicitous

dealing of yours with the different disciples of the same guru, is an

obvious example.

 

 

 

- mnd