Protest!

[Guest guest]

> I also thought we were on friendly terms and was surprised to

> recieve very antagonistic letters, both publicly and privately

> from you.

 

I only did that after you publicly lied about me on COM saying

that I also, like Bob, have invented deviant philosophy to

justify my maya. And after you for the last year together with

others have been questioning my motives and hinting that I don't

care for the abused kids in ISKCON just because I present it from

a different angle than you and other, who seem to be running on

hysteria mode and condemning me and the whole of ISKCON because

these things took place.

 

I think the real issue is that many devotees are bitter at ISKCON

because they somehow couldn't get their material show together in

ISKCON, and now they blame ISKCON for their failed lives and

frustrations in life. Nobody, and especially not you, is going to

accuse me of of being an enemy of the abused children in ISKCON.

That's why I become abusive. It wasn't until I had five

hysterical people on my back getting all worked up because dareed

suggest a more philosophical approach, that I have become

abusive. I took it of course for granted that everyone knows that

I don't like to see children being abused. But as I said, the

real issue is not about child-abuse, because we all agree that

there should be done something about and that the abusers should

be brought to justice. I am a firm believer in that. So that

cannot be the issue. I think the real issue is that there is a

deliberate attempt to destroy ISKCON by former disgruntled

devotees, and they are launching one attack against ISKCON after

another.

 

They have for the last 10 years actively been trying to instigate

the devotees to revolt against the GBC. You are acting like a

piece in their game.