Guest guest Posted November 30, 1999 Report Share Posted November 30, 1999 > Certianly, this term 95% is being used by Srila Prabhupada in the sense of > "most Indians", or "most all Indians", and my experience in India for six > years (and not in place like Vrindavan or Mayapura, where westerner > devotees have facility to avoid or minimize their contact with the locals) > is that this statement of Srila Prabhupada is still true. > > I would have to ask you this: what is your experience in India? I have been living in India for the last 10 years. I moved to punya bhumi, the land of dharma, with very high ideals and lots of regard for vedic culture. I still believe in the same ideals and I still think vedic culture is vastly superior to western materialism but after ten years of firsthand experience of socalled vedic India I have to admit that I became quite disillusioned with the India of today because it appears to be almost as materialistic as the west. Yes, there are still millions of Indians who are by their very nature and upbringing pious and devoted to Krishna, but at the same time the statistics that Madhusudani Radha presented are definitely factual not fiction. I dont know about Vrindavana and other holy places in India, but in Mayapura and Shantipur there is a good deal of prostitution and alcoholism. Nowadays it is not anymore completely safe for a western mataji to go to the Ganga unaccompanied. There are too many shady characters and drunkards who are simply waiting to sexually harass a white skinned girl. I have also firsthand experience of the numerous scandals which are going on in the Indian village setting. Murder, kidnapping, rape, incest, divorce, child abuse. You name it, it is all there in holy India. We have experienced it right there in Mayapur, what to speak of in other places. Several times have I been approached by indian village girls who were desperate to get remarried to a western devotee because they had been beaten, cheated on and ultimately dumped by their drinking husbands. How many times have I been approached by young Indian men who wanted to get married to a western girl or pleaded with me to help them get a visa to the holy lands America, Germany or Britain. Once a twenty year old Indian told me: "Every Indian youth wants to have a girl friend like Bo Derek or Brooke Shields." At the time, I did not even know who Bo Derek or Brooke Shield were. Yes, India is still watching Mahabharata once a week on Durdarshan (Indian national tv) but they watch cricket, Hindi movies and the Bold and the Beautiful on STAR TV every day. Madhusudani Radha has pointed out that not everything is sweetness and light in India. In India,there are wonderful remnants of dharma and just so much ugliness side by side.So much so that it is becoming more and more hard to see much of a difference between India and the west. That is why I do not understand why Madhusudani Radha is drawing so much flack from Kk das and Guru Krishna. As Atma Tattva das (born in India in a brahmin family) used to point out time and again: there is western nonsense and there is vedic nonsense. Believe it or not,living in India has increased my respect for certain aspects of western civilization and I am now at a point where I can see that there is actually not so much of a difference between a sincere Christian and a sincere follower of the Vedas. The debate between KK das and Madhusudani Radha seems to be simply a matter of seeing the glass half full or half empty. He sees it as half full, she sees it as half empty. But is it really necessary to call her offensive and a shameless madwoman? ys Anantarupa And Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.