Enzomied souls

[Guest guest]

>

> >At least you are sailing away from that "zombi" argument "It was not

> instructed by Prabhupada".

>

> Oh, don't relax yet, prabhu. Whatever the particular item might happen to

> be, for me it *does* matter if something was instructed or prohibited by

> Srila Prabhupada.

 

You can't see even the difference in between "Prabhupada did not

instruct something" and "Prabhupada prohibited something". For

you this seems to be a synonym. Well, your problem.

 

 

> Imperfect as I certainly am in my ability to follow a

> particular order or prohibition, nevertheless it will make a difference in

> how I approach the matter. So I guess that means I'm still a zombie, no?

 

You can chose to be whatever you want. Others got their own

intelligence to draw the lines in between what is prohibited to

them by Guru&God and what is not. That means, the *others* are

not necessarily all zombies to go after somebody else's funny

"definitions" of what's prohibited to them.

 

So for you, to "kick a ball" is an activity prohibited by God

(through his representative). Great, sir, just tell it to us

so that we can know with whom we can't go kicking a ball on the

field. Isn't it so simple, after all? But why are you still standing

there on the edge of the field and waiving with your one-volume copy

of Srimad-bhagavatam? A weight lifting, aerobic, or what?

 

 

>

> Here's where we *really* disagree! We always have Srila Prabhupada as our

> perfect siksa-guru. We cannot go wrong by becoming his dog.

 

Nor you can ever go wrong grabbing for some of these old good

"for_Prabhupada" meaningless demagogy. Of course you are

Prabhupadanuga, since you never kick a ball, just like Naradaji

and just unlike some others of us here.

 

But I guess you have already made a point that your good self is

not braking the Acarya's prohibitions, no? Or you still feel the

need to keep convincing everybody?

 

 

 

 

- Mahanidhi das