GHQ: all misogynists?

[Guest guest]

> sastra as mentioned above, whenever necessary. But that is a different

> thing from overemphasizing or aggravating. It is rather an ongoing attempt

> to establish a philosophically superior understanding to the present one.

>

And what is that superior philosophical understanding? Superior to what?

Could you please clerify that?

 

As far as I could see the followers of the GHQ had quite some gross

philosophical misunderstandings, like that female material bodies (human

species, female gender) don't act according to the modes of material nature,

but according to male material bodies (human species, male gender).

Ys. Sraddha dd