Guest guest Posted December 28, 1999 Report Share Posted December 28, 1999 > On 27 Dec 1999, Sraddha dd wrote: > > > > sastra as mentioned above, whenever necessary. But that is a different > > > thing from overemphasizing or aggravating. It is rather an ongoing > > > attempt to establish a philosophically superior understanding to the > > > present one. > > > > > And what is that superior philosophical understanding? Superior to > > what? > > Could you please clerify that? > > Philosophical and practical, both, actually. In other words, the overall > moral and social conditions of ISKCON devotees needs to be uplifted. That > will be done by improving our understanding of and application of Krsna > consciousness philosophy and Vedic culture. This is still not clear. What is exactly that the GHQ people whant to change and think that is not proper in a current ISKCON system? What is it that is philosophically wrong? > > As far as I could see the followers of the GHQ had quite some gross > > philosophical misunderstandings, like that female material bodies > > >(human > species, female gender) don't act according to the modes of >material > nature, but according to male material bodies (human species, >male > gender). > > I don't recall that particular misunderstanding. If you like, you can read > some things now at <www.ghqd.org> for a current assessment. > Arn't Sita and Jivan Mukta part of the GHQ group? Jivan Mukta came up with an idea that one is becoming a pure devotee by becoming a brahmana and Sita and him were preaching that a woman gets the varna of her husband. And if they don't represent the GHQ, whom do they represent then? Ys. Sraddha dd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.