important

[Guest guest]

> I mean from the quote you gave. Because another consideration, since you

> are "a bona fide preacher", is that you cannot make "a material

> distinction" and consider your "humble" interlocutor as "lowly". After

> all, he is a preacher of the International Society of Krisna

> Consciousness.

 

Please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada.

Thank you for considering my wellbeing.

No, I am not a preacher, but I have seen many preachers hiding behind the

doors humbly waiting for leftovers from the managing men after a whole day

on sankirtan. Those devotees in women bodies who have sacrificed everything

personal, living in bananaboxes for years to uphold temples and communities,

while still not being asked to share their undoubtedly valuable realizations

with others. And if they do, they are accused of trying to seduce the men.

 

The preacher quoted was Srila Prabhupada, not me.

I certainly make material distinctions and I know that for me to simply

follow my husband is the most safe path right now, since I am not very

advanced spiritually but rather completely attached to my family. However

that does not mean that every body else in a womens body are nessecarily on

the same platform.

 

Regarding welcoming guests, as long as they dont hurt eachother and my

husband dont disagree, I will welcome any devotee the Lord sends to my home.

 

Your servant Gunamani d.d.