Guest guest Posted December 28, 1999 Report Share Posted December 28, 1999 > On 28 Dec 1999, Trayimaya das wrote: > > > This "MatajiMataji" Mataji", whom you so condescendingly address is > > > my > wife. > > "Condescendingly"? > > >You´ve got an attitude-problem. Why not just debate without insulting, > > I humbly request the same of you, prabhu. Please don't accuse me of > insulting your good wife, when I certainly have not. > > Hare Krsna. Okay, I´ll substantiate You made some very odd conclusions on behalf of Gunamanis posting: > Why not > share that space equally with the female gender of other species also? Is > that what you mean to establish by the above quote? > Therefore, cows, elephants, and dogs should also be treated fairly and > thus granted equal space in every ISKCON temple. Is this correct, Mataji? If you really thought that the purpose of the text of my wife was to establish femaleanimals in the templeroom that would be an insult, yes. I guess you just mentioned it for humour, right? Anyway, no offence taken, sometimes it would be a bit of a change to have an elephant or two for a kirtan, really. Hare Krishna. ys Trayimaya dasa PS: As you may have noticed I do not mind in any way the use of the title "Mataji". There is no point in making an issue out of that. The tone of your letter was percieved as arrogant from my perspective, that´s all. It may simply be the medium of COM that confuses me, I´ll give you the benefit of the doubt. Please accept my humble obeisances. Hare Krishna. (My good wife tells me to let you know that I have a very physical job and my biceps (and triceps) are welldeveloped:)) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.