what is still not known

[Guest guest]

Dear Madhusudani,

 

I addressed my questions to Sudharma herself so will assume you wrote on

her behalf.

 

>I think what you really want to know is the reason for the sudden increase

>a few weeks before the VNN expose, isn't it? At least that's the focus of

>the so-called "Think tank" text and its paraniod conclusion that it must

>have involved a sharing of GHQ texts and the construction of

>"Ardhabuddhi's" expose. As Sudharma Prabhu has already explained, that is

>wrong.

 

No, that is not what I really want to know. Understanding these details was

not the main focus of the Notes From a Think Tank paper, neither is the

conclusion of this paper "paranoid". Sudharma's denial doesn't clear our

doubts of whether Women's Ministry members were in any way involved in

"Ardhabuddhi's" expose. The Women's Ministry was not the said direct

publisher of the leaked GHQ texts but what about each and every Women's

Ministry member (on and off conference) and its related IWC conference

organizer?

 

It is true there were hundreds of cross-posted texts that were sent to the

WM conference but that doesn't answer the question of whether each and

every conference and private text that each and every any WM member

(conference member, ministry member or IWC organizer) received did not

include any GHQ texts that were posted on VNN before Ardhabuddhi wrote the

expose that appeared on VNN. THAT is something many people would like to

know as is the identity of the person who leaked the texts in the first

place.

 

>Paranoia is obviously alive and well in cyberspace. :-)

 

Maybe you can refrain from using words that many people will interpret as

being your pyschological diagnosis of a mental disorder (even if you put a

smiley face at the end). I believe such is unethical for someone in your

profession.

 

Your servant, Sita dd