Guest guest Posted March 18, 2001 Report Share Posted March 18, 2001 A few years ago, I wrote an open letter to Tripurari Swami* questioning his views on morality that I read in his newsletter. I was arguing that if we want to have some impact on society it was necessary for us to come down from the transcendental paradigm, where spiritualists like to dwell on, to a more actual one. For our philosophy aims towards transcendental goals and practically nothing less. SB 1.2.25: Purport by Srila Prabhupada: "The rajas stage of life gives a slight clue to the realization of the Absolute Truth in the forms of fine sentiments in philosophy, art and culture with moral and ethical principles, but the mode of sattva is a still higher stage of material quality, which actually helps one in realizing the Absolute Truth." While reading this at the temple, I stopped one of my godbrother who was passing by: “See here!” He put his glasses and read. I then asked: “Are philosophers, culture, morality, and ethics in the mode of passion?” “Well”, he replied, “that’s what it looks like” and left. Although becoming a pure devotee is a most precious goal to maintain as an ideal and a personal project, I feel that we could be much more effective in our preaching if we adopt a rajasic approach. At the present time, people in general will never rise to the bramanical stage or take to pure devotional service. Prabhupada’s instructions mainly focus on the transcendental path. Nevertheless, he sometimes expressed his disappointement for not seeing his disciples taking up seriously to the path of pure bhakti. Therefore, he planned a varnasrama society. Infortunately, it never took off. It is quite normal. What devotees understand by varnashram dharma is an old system of civil society that resemble the medieval type. Never, we can never come back to this form of organization! The idea that Prabhupada had in mind is a system where eventually everyone could be exposed to Krishna consciousness on a regular base. That was his first consideration. We have lost sight of this altruist aspect of his personality. That idea of Srila Prabhupada is found in his books or in the old scriptures not as static definitions but as directives for creative applications. Prabhupada has always been trying to find out new ways to preach Krishna consciousness. Excited by such dynamics, he came to America. * www.geocities.com/akhilesvara2000 (if you did not read the letter, there is not much more there.) Akhilesvara dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2001 Report Share Posted March 21, 2001 In a message dated 3/18/01 2:50:27 PM Central Standard Time, Akhilesvara.ACBSP (AT) pamho (DOT) net writes: << A few years ago, I wrote an open letter to Tripurari Swami* questioning his views on morality that I read in his newsletter. I was arguing that if we want to have some impact on society it was necessary for us to come down from the transcendental paradigm, where spiritualists like to dwell on, to a more actual one. For our philosophy aims towards transcendental goals and practically nothing less. >> What was his reply? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2001 Report Share Posted March 21, 2001 On 21 Mar 2001, Mahatma das wrote: > What was his reply? I think now and again we need to assert the supramoral reality of Gaudiya Vaishnavaism. [...] My sense is that you are very interested in the moral aspect of our tradition and less so in the eternal lila. [...] While stressing the ultimacy of gopi bhava, moral life is consoidered foundational to attaining it. What is the problem? [...] Do what you can to uplift society, but I do not think you are speaking from the perspective of an uttama adhikari with regard to preaching in the "practical" advocay theorized about in your letter. [...] You said: "Sorry if I repeat myself, but chanting Hare Krsna only is not the answer, it is part of it. You can have a hundred devotees chanting Hare Krsna and still fight to death with each other because of differences. It is one thing to talk exclusive transcendence, it is another to engage the world in Krsna consciousness. Therefore an "uttama adhikari" comes "down to earth"; to a practical platform. A balance should be offered to the masses between spiritual and material, the soul and the body, pure and impure, black and white." The above does not represt my Guru Maharaja, Srila A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, whose teachings I am throughly acquainted with inside out and backwards, both through his books, his practical example, my own personal experience, through his instructions to me personally, and through realization gained in the course of selfess service for thrity years, twenty five of which have been int he renounced order that he bestowed upon me. I also have had the good fortune of assciating intimately whith his beloved Godbrother Swami B.R. Sridhara Maharaja at my Gurudeva's recommendation. Both of these uttama adhikaris recongnized my ability to preach, and my preaching record stands for itself. [...] Forgive me but I do not know what you have done "practically" to spread Krsna consciousness in the last three decades. Overall I find your advice out of balance, with little faith in or acquaintence with suddha nama either theortetically or practically. [...] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.