Guest guest Posted March 19, 1999 Report Share Posted March 19, 1999 We have lately heard serious allegations of cow abuse at ISKCON's two most important centers, Vrndavana and Mayapura. These allegations come from several sources, including Syamasundara dasa, a devotee who has a reputation as a long-term, highly conscientious herdsman at Bhaktivedanta Manor, to such an extent that he has even written a book on Cow Protection in Krsna consciousness. Syamasundara prabhu states that these two goshallas were breeding about 30 cows a year for many years, and should now have herds of three or four hundred cows, but instead, neither goshalla has more than 150 cows. In accordance with guidelines presented by the Minimum Standards for Cow Protection (see "News"at http://www.angelfire.com/co/iscowp/ ) presented by the Ministry for Cow Protection and Agriculture, he finds this strong indication of neglect and cow abuse. In all fairness to the Vrndavana and Mayapura goshallas, despite the solid credentials of devoees rasing the question, at this time we must wait until a full investigation can be made by representatives appointed by ISKCON's Ministry of Cow Protection and Agriculture. Once the Ministry of Cow Protection and Agriculture and the Ministry of Justice have had an opportunity to review the investigating committee's report (including statements and interviews with GBC's, temple presidents, and herdsmen in charge in each case), the appropriate steps can be taken to sort out any misunderstandings and appropriately address any wrongdoings that are uncovered. In the meantime, I want to address a particular issue which seems to be part of the current situation and many other instances of cow abuse in ISKCON as well. That is: We hear many instances of cow abuse in ISKCON which have taken place at an earlier point in time, under different authorities, such as GBCs, temple presidents, and herdsman(women) who are no longer associated with the projects in question. Indeed, many of them are no longer members of ISKCON. My question is this: If we can determine that significant instances of cow abuse have taken place, do we not have an obligation to perform some type of public, formal apology for such instances? Don't we owe an apology to the Krsna and Prabhupada and the cows and sometimes even the cow-herds who struggled in vain to protect the cows but whose pleas fell upon our deaf ears? Or do we just try to sweep such un-pleasantness under the rug, and continue on our way as if nothing ever happened? Do we simply continue our fund-raising for the next big temple and try to hush things up? We know that the cows are never going to threaten us with a lawsuit. They are never going to even write one single letter of protest at any abuse we might do to them. But I believe there is a subtle spiritual deterioration that is taking place because we haven't come clean about the cows, that we -- as a society -- have not owned up to our responsibility for what has happened to them. And, as long as we are reluctant to investigate past abuses, as long as we refuse to take responsibility for them, I am afraid that we are condemned to commit further abuses to the cows. There are so many allegations of abuse? Are they true or untrue? Where are the investigations to learn the truth? And, if they are true, where is our apology? It seems important that this apology should be personally and formally led by the GBC in charge of the project where the abuse is found. The present GBC and the present temple president should lead the apology. Other devotees may also want to join in. But without apology, without any repentence, how can we ever change our wrong course? What are the feelings of others about the need for formal apology for incidents of cow abuse -- whether they be current or in the past? your servant, Hare Krsna dasi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.