Guest guest Posted March 31, 1999 Report Share Posted March 31, 1999 On 31 Mar 1999, Jatukarnya das wrote: > > Again you misunderstood. When we are talking amongst transcendentalists > > in the parampara the conceptions of copyrights cannot be applied. Nirmana > > moha jita sanga dosa... > > Are you floating up there in the transcendental realm, or what? I don't > think many of the others on this forum is, so could you please come down to... I am talking straight from Gita. See the reference I gave above BG15.5 Purport and BG5.29 and many others. > By the way, why do you use Madhusudhani's karmi name? You don't recognize > her as a devotee, or what? I didn't. I just hit the reply button. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 1999 Report Share Posted March 31, 1999 Please, let's just let Virender prabhu have the last word on this discussion. We need to move on to other topics. your servant, Hare Krsna dasi WWW: Virender Dayal (New York NY - USA) wrote: > [Text 2200070 from COM] > > On 31 Mar 1999, Jatukarnya das wrote: > > > > Again you misunderstood. When we are talking amongst transcendentalists > > > in the parampara the conceptions of copyrights cannot be applied. Nirmana > > > moha jita sanga dosa... > > > > Are you floating up there in the transcendental realm, or what? I don't > > think many of the others on this forum is, so could you please come down > to... > > I am talking straight from Gita. See the reference I gave above BG15.5 > Purport and BG5.29 and many others. > > > By the way, why do you use Madhusudhani's karmi name? You don't recognize > > her as a devotee, or what? > > I didn't. I just hit the reply button. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.